View clinical trials related to Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Filter by:This study aims to the assessment of pelvic floor symptoms and patients´ satisfaction after bilateral sacrospinous fixation for the primary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse stage IV.
This is a Canadian, multi-centre, double-blind randomized controlled trial of an innovative vaginal surgery technique for correction of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women. Vaginal surgery is preferred as minimally invasive, however the investigators do not know if materials such as synthetic polypropylene mesh improve success, durability and cost-effectiveness long-term. The investigators principal goal is to compare the experimental bilateral sacrospinous vaginal vault fixation with synthetic mesh arms (BSSVF-M) to the current standard of sacrospinous ligament suspension with synthetic sutures (SSLS) over a timeline of 2 years. Patients and evaluators will be blind to technique.
The pelvic floor is composed of muscles and connective tissue which acts to provide support for pelvic organs, and weakness or injury to the pelvic floor can result in pelvic floor dysfunction. Respect for patient autonomy is a guiding principle in medicine and is of increasing importance for patients. The PREPARED Trial hopes to demonstrate whether a single workshop on pelvic floor health during pregnancy will lead to improved knowledge of pelvic floor symptoms postpartum, increase the practice of pelvic floor muscle exercises, increase satisfaction with their delivery experience, and change participants preferences and thoughts surrounding various modes of delivery.
Vaginal packing is used routinely following vaginal reconstructive surgery, however, no recommendation regarding vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy exists. Despite little data to support the practice, purported benefits better positioning and fixation of the mesh, improving incorporation of the mesh by its fixation and reduced blood loss. Patients often complain of discomfort associated with the packing or its removal. The aim of this randomized controlled is to compare the subjective impressions of pain and bother in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy treated with and without packing. The investigators also aim to assess differences in postoperative bacteriuria, urine retention and hemoglobin levels on day 5 after the surgery and surgery outcome and complications at one year after the surgery in those with and without packing.
Main objective is evaluation of success rate of ambulatory surgery (AS) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). All surgical approaches (laparoscopic, vaginal) are included in the study. Secondary objectives are AS rate in the overall population and reasons for ineligibility or failure of ambulatory surgery. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of AS for POP and identify pitfalls in AS. A randomized control study will follow PCAP study.
The investigators will analyze biomechanical transformation of pelvic floor tissues and support structures under affected pelvic floor conditions and repaired states after the surgery.
The purpose of this study is to identify whether a new operative technic would be acceptable in female with pelvic organ prolapse.
This is the first study comparing the laparoscopic sacropexy with Pelvic Organs Prolapse Suspension (POPS) to treat pelvic organ prolapse. This prospective randomized surgical trial is designed to test the clinical and functional effects of the two different laparoscopic procedures in terms of anatomical correction of the prolapse, post-operative and long term morbidity, rate of recurrence and subjective satisfaction of the patient evaluated by a quality of life questionnaire.
Retrospective analysis of vaginal microbiota in the post-operative course of patient operated for genital prolapse with vaginal mesh with or without mesh related complication
During surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, it is common for the surgeon to inject fluid into the vaginal tissues to help with tissue dissection. It is common that anesthetic medication is mixed into this fluid to help with pain control after surgery. Usually the pain medication injected is short-acting. In this study the investigators plan to compare the usual short-acting injected pain medication with a long-acting injected pain medication to evaluate whether this improves pain control after surgery. One type surgical procedure for prolapse will be evaluated. The procedure is sacrospinous ligament fixation. This is suspension of the vagina to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Study participants will be randomized to one of two study groups: 1. Lidocaine group (short-acting medication). 2. Liposomal bupivacaine group (long-acting medication) Information will be collected on study participants, including: demographics, procedure data, and post-operative information. The primary outcome of this study is determine if use of long-acting injected local anesthesia at the time of sacrospinous ligament fixation leads to less post-operative pain compared to short-acting local anesthesia. Secondary outcomes include: 1. post-operative opioid medication use 2. return to baseline pain status 3. post-operative time to first bowel movement 4. post-operative antiemetic use (nausea medication) 5. results of voiding trial after surgery 6. patient satisfaction with pain control