View clinical trials related to Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Filter by:To monitor post-market performance through evaluation of short and long-term performance via: - Efficacy - Safety - Patient reported outcomes
This study is designed to compare the safety and efficacy of a commercially available mesh kit used for surgical repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with traditional suture repair surgery.
This study will evaluate the effect of pessary therapy, with and without Solifenacin (Vesicare), on symptoms of over active bladder and bladder function in women with overactive bladder symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse. Study Hypotheses: Null hypothesis, HO: Reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and treatment with solifenacin does not improve overactive bladder symptoms more than reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and placebo. Alternate hypothesis, HA: Reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and treatment with solifenacin does improve overactive bladder symptoms more than reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and placebo.
To prospectively observe the outcomes of surgical prolapse treatment in terms of urinary, bowel, and sexual function, quality of life, patient satisfaction, cost, and achieving patient determined treatment goals.
Women who undergo posterior colporrhaphy with graft augmentation will have a lower recurrence of their posterior wall defect than women who undergo a traditional posterior colporrhaphy.
The Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Effort (CARE) trial is a research study designed to evaluate whether the addition of a second surgical procedure in addition to a procedure for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects the rates of urinary incontinence. This study will follow women in the CARE study for 10 years from the time of the surgery to compare success and complication rates in the two groups. Recruitment into this study is open only to women that already participated in CARE. Recruitment into CARE is closed.