View clinical trials related to Pelvic Neoplasms.
Filter by:Background Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common malignancy of the urinary system. Hematuria is a significant clinical manifestation of UC, often diagnosed through invasive procedures. Urine DNA methylation testing is a promising non-invasive method for early UC detection. Objectives To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of urine DNA methylation testing for detecting UC in patients with hematuria, using standard clinical and pathological diagnoses as the gold standard. We also aim to investigate the association between preoperative urine DNA methylation status and prognosis in UC patients. For non-UC patients: Follow up for one year to assess the risk of UC development based on preoperative urine DNA methylation status. Sample Size Calculation Expected sensitivity: 86% Expected specificity: 90% Significance level (Alpha): 0.05 Total participants needed: 1053 (adjusted for 5% dropout rate, 1109 participants will be recruited). Study Procedure Enrollment and Sample Collection: Screen patients, obtain consent, collect urine samples. Blinding and Testing: Blinded sample processing and DNA methylation testing. Unblinding and Analysis: Statistical analysis of sensitivity and specificity. Reporting: Compilation and consolidation of clinical trial reports. We anticipate that urine DNA methylation testing will show high sensitivity and specificity for UC diagnosis in patients with hematuria, providing valuable non-invasive diagnostic information and improving patient outcomes.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the study drug, LY4052031, is safe, tolerable and effective in participants with advanced, or metastatic solid tumors including urothelial cancer. The study is conducted in two parts - phase Ia (dose-escalation, dose-optimization) and phase Ib (dose-expansion). The study will last up to approximately 4 years.
This study evaluates the reliability of functional MRI measurements in pelvic disease through quantifying repeatability and reproducibility, using healthy volunteers. The aim is to provide insights into the consistency of results across sessions and observers, informing the trustworthiness of functional MRI in assessing pelvic disease and particularly rectal cancers and guiding protocol optimization.
Background: Hematuria, a common symptom of urinary system diseases, can result from various causes including infection, stones, trauma, and tumors. Urothelial carcinoma (UC), the most common malignancy of the urinary system, often presents with hematuria. Current diagnostic methods like urine cytology and cystoscopy have limitations in sensitivity and specificity, and cystoscopy is invasive. DNA methylation biomarkers offer potential for non-invasive UC detection, improving diagnostic accuracy in hematuria patients. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting UC in patients with hematuria. Methods: This prospective pilot study will involve collecting preoperative urine samples from hematuria patients for DNA methylation testing using MSRE-qPCR. Sample size calculation was based on an assumed 25% prevalence of UC in hematuria patients, resulting in a total of 71 participants after accounting for a 20% dropout rate. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic performance will be assessed using ROC curves. Conclusion: This study seeks to validate the effectiveness of urine DNA methylation testing for UC detection in hematuria patients, providing a basis for its clinical application and informing the design of larger future studies.
This study's purpose is the comparison of the automatically segmented 3D model to the reference manual segmentation, based on the Dice precision index. It is implemented by making parents' patients, surgeons and surgical helpers answer specific questions comparing 3D images to usual 2D images of the patient's tumor.
This research study will enroll people who have cancer in their abdomen or pelvis that was treated previously with radiation therapy. The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and possible harms of treating tumors in these regions with another round of radiation therapy, called reirradiation or "reRT." The researchers want to find out what effects (good and bad) reRT has in people with cancer in the abdomen and pelvis.
Evaluation of clinical and dosimetric aspects, tolerance, and effectiveness of abdominal-pelvic region radiotherapy treatments in patients undergoing radiotherapy for primary or secondary neoplasms localized in the tabdominal-pelvic region.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the study drug, LY4101174, is safe, tolerable and effective in participants with advanced, or metastatic solid tumors. The study is conducted in two parts - phase Ia (dose-escalation, dose-optimization) and phase Ib (dose-expansion). The study will last up to approximately 4 years.
The primary objective of radiation therapy is to deliver a therapeutic dose of radiation precisely to the target while minimizing exposure to healthy surrounding tissues. Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) involves acquiring cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans just before or during treatment sessions. By comparing the CBCT images with the reference images from the treatment planning process, clinicians can make necessary adjustments to ensure precise targeting and account for any changes that may have occurred since the initial planning. Conventional CBCT technology is, however, limited by several factors including long acquisition times that result in motion artifacts in the image, smaller fields of view that limit the volume of anatomy that can be imaged, poor image quality that limits soft tissue visibility, and artifacts created by dense metal implants. This study will evaluate a novel CBCT imaging solution ("HyperSight") that has the potential to address the challenges of conventional CBCT.
This prospective registry-based trial will include patients with pelvic or thoracic tumors with an indication for radiotherapy treated with oART or IGRT. For the primary endpoint and the secondary clinical endpoints, the trial will compare oART versus IGRT, for technical endpoints the trial will compare the real oART scenario with two virtual (hypothetical) control scenarios. Primary endpoint: - 10% reduction in the rate of acute radiotherapy related toxicity (≥ CTCAE II°, v5.0) using oART Secondary endpoints: - Clinical endpoints: Tumor control, late toxicities compared to conventional irradiated patients, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes - Technical endpoints: Target volume, target coverage, dose to organs at risk, anatomical variability score