View clinical trials related to Pectus Excavatum.
Filter by:Investigators hypothesize that Erector spinae catheter pain management protocol would allow patients to have earlier and more effective rehabilitation with decreased length of hospital stay. The aims are to compare LOS between the two groups (epidural and ES groups). Secondary aims are to compare recovery outcomes (mobilization time), time required to do the blocks, pain scores and opioid use during hospitalization and on follow up after discharge until Pain clinic visit, side effects, family satisfaction and readmissions among the two groups. In addition, in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes in subjects who received ESP protocol will be studied.
This is a prospective randomized double-blind non-inferiority trial designed to test the hypothesis that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is non-inferior to thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in postoperative pain control after pectus excavatum repair.
Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital abnormality of the thoracic wall and occurs in 1 in 400 newborns. The gold standard treatment is the Nuss bar Procedure. However, in very severe cases, pectus exacavatum involves little or no space between the heart and sternum. Because of the limited space, the Nuss procedure is more difficult to perform and there is an increased risk of complications such as injuries to the heart or large vessels. However, this increased risk can again be reduced by using the Crane technique. This technique increases the substernal space by sternal 'hoisting' via an external steel wire. Despite the fact that this technique is commonly used, it is not known what its quantitative effect is on the substernal space during the Nuss bar procedure. The subsequent aim of this study is to quantify the effect of the Crane technique during minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum through three-dimensional scans acquired before and after application of the Crane technique.
The study aims to investigate the most frequent psychological outcomes associated to chest wall deformities and patients' quality of life.
Pectus excavatum is the most common chest wall deformity in children, accounting for 90% of all congenital chest wall deformities. It occurs in one to eight per 1000 live births. The severity of the pectus deformity may become more noticeable during pubertal growth spurs and repair is therefore usually performed in the teenage years. A common operative procedure to repair a pectus deformity is the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). The MIRPE involves the substernal placement of a contoured metal bar secured to the lateral aspect of the ribs. This metal bar allows for correction of the concave deformity by applying constant outward pressure to the underside of the sternum. Although the cosmetic results are excellent, patients do report significant pain from the constant pressure exerted on the chest wall from the metal bar. Pain management approaches tend to differ on both the provider and institutional level. There is a lack of evidence regarding which postoperative analgesia method is best. To address this research gap, this proposal aims to conduct a randomized controlled trail using the three most commonly used methods; 1) patient controlled analgesia (PCA); 2) erector spinae blocks (ESB) with continuous infusion pumps; and 3) video-assisted intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC).
Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital anterior chest wall deformity, known to occur in 1:400 of new-borns. Complaints may be of cosmetic nature or as a consequence of (cardio)pulmonary impairment. Part of the current work-up of pectus excavatum patients in Zuyderland Medical Centre (Heerlen, the Netherlands) is visual documentation of the deformity. Visual documentation is performed utilising a single-reflex camera and consists of 5 standard photographs (acquired from different angles) and two specialised recordings. These specialised recordings encompass a recording to measure the pectus excavatum's depth and a raster stereography recording to create a three-dimensional perspective. However, this form of visual documentation is not efficient, as it is time- and labor-intensive for the photographer and patient. Recently, another study started that aims to investigate whether three-dimensional (3D) optical surface scans can be used to determine pectus severity, as compared to chest radiographs and computed tomography scans (3DPECTUS study; METCZ20190048; NCT03926078). Building on this study it was determined whether 3D optical surface scans can be used as a tool to document the surface geometry of pectus excavatum. To determine whether the current standard photographs and specialised recordings can be replaced by a 3D scan, both methods are compared. To make this comparison, the pectus excavatum depth was chosen as an objective measure of agreement. If there is good agreement, it is assumed that the standard photos can be replaced by a 3D photo in the current work-up. This will subsequently result in a time saving as well as a reduced burden for the patient while acquisition of 3D scans takes only 10 seconds.
Pectus excavatum (PE); It is an anterior chest wall deformity, characterized by varying degrees of depression of the sternum and costal cartilage, usually occurring at birth or in the first year of life. In the treatment of non-severe PE; vacuum bell orthosis and physiotherapy (especially exercise) is recommended as an alternative to surgery. Although there is no literature or consensus about the role of physiotherapy, it is believed that it plays an important role in preventing or correcting deformities and creating a good cosmetic appearance. Therefore, in this study, the investigators aimed to investigate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in addition to vacuum bell therapy.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) block in children after pectus excavatum repair (nuss procedure).
Preoperative fasting is intended to lower the amount of gastric contents in order to decrease the incidence of aspiration associated with endotracheal intubation. However, recent studies show that longer fasting time does not reduce aspiration associated complications. Especially in pediatric patients, long fasting time increases patients' unpleasantness and therefore increases postoperative recovery quality. It also induces hypoglycemia. In many studies, ingesting clear liquids 2 hours up to general anesthesia decreases gastric contents and therefore the incidence of aspiration pneumonia, postoperative nausea and vomiting. Therefore anesthesiologist associations in the US and Europe recommend to drink small amount of clear liquid (water) up to 2 hours before the surgery. Nuss bar operation, or repair surgery of pectus excavatum is mostly done in pediatric patients. The procedure itself is very painful, requiring paramount amount of analgesics. Use of opioid analgesics increases postoperative nausea and vomiting. In this study, our aim is to evaluate preoperative fasting time and how preoperative supplement of clear liquid affects the quality of recovery postoperatively.
Pectus excavatum is the most common anterior chest wall deformity that affects up to 1:400 of newborns. If an operative correction is indicated, patients are often operated via the Ravitsch or Nuss bar procedure. The latter (i.e. the Nuss bar procedure) is the most commonly performed procedure. During this procedure one or more metal bars are inserted behind the sternum to push the sternum back into its normal position. These bars remain in situ for two-to-three years before being removed. Despite the fact that the Nuss bar procedure is regarded as an effective procedure, retraction may occur after removal. A recent study has investigated this phenomenon, utilizing three-dimensional (3D) optical surface scans acquired before and after Nuss bar removal. The authors found statistically significant changes to occur in chest wall dimensions directly after, as well as between 2 and 8 weeks after Nuss bar explantation, in comparison to the situation just prior to bar removal. They, moreover, found the time the bar was in situ to be predictive for retraction. However, the authors also stressed that further studies are needed to reinforce their preliminary findings and perform long-term assessments. Subsequently, a similar study with long-term assessments will be conducted.