View clinical trials related to Patient Safety.
Filter by:This project aims to create and evaluate a tool that gathers patient and family member feedback and makes it rapidly available to providers, enabling nimble and responsive safety and quality improvement efforts. Aim 1. Determine feasibility and acceptability of the patient data collection and provider dashboard tool. The investigators will conduct usability testing prior to study start, measure user (patients and providers) engagement over time, and gather feedback about the tool at study end. This will test the hypothesis that patient and caregiver characteristics will predict tool use. Aim 2. Assess whether reporting patient- and caregiver- observed processes of care to providers leads to changes over time. The investigators hypothesize that performance on structured items of interest will improve over time with rapidly available data presented to providers. Aim 3. Estimate tool implementation effect sizes, using a pre-post design, on medical errors.
The purpose of this study is reduce episodes of intradialytic hypotension, low blood pressure during a hemodialysis session, in patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Recruitment will take place on the clinic level rather than the patient level.
This is a single center, randomized study that assessed the effects of mindfulness training on physician teaching teams at a VA hospital.
Building on the Norwegian Patient Safety Program's target areas, the Patients' Surgical Checklist (PASC) will empower surgical patients to become more involved in their own safety and contribute to preventive safety measures. A safety checklist for patients to use has been developed and validated for use in surgical patients. In a Stepped Wedge Cluster RCT effects of patients using their own checklists to avoid preventable patient harm are examined. The project will re-use existing health and personal data collected from patient records and patient reported data as outcome measures. A consortium of all relevant stakeholders and users participate: two hospitals with seven surgical clusters, patient representatives, representatives of general practitioners, and interdisciplinary in-hospital professionals. The important project partners are information and communications technology companies (Helse-Vest IKT and CheckWare service delivery), general practitioners, and national and international research partners leading in the field of patient safety, implementation science and health economics.
Whereas there are several validated systems for reporting postoperative complications, there are only a few and not prospectively validated systems for reporting intraoperative complications. The investigators developed a definition and CLASSification for Intraoperative Complications CLASSIC within a Delphi study involving international interdisciplinary experts. As both surgery and anaesthesia may be involved in complications in the perioperative period, all patient-related intraoperative complications occurring between skin incision and closure are considered in this reporting system. CLASSIC was updated to ClassIntra® v1·0, by encompassing five severity grades to align with the validated Clavien-Dindo Classification for grading postoperative complications. The aim of this international multicentre observational cohort study is to assess the validity and practicability of this newly derived and updated classification system ClassIntra® in patient undergoing an in-hospital surgical procedure. Providing an easy applicable and internationally validated classification system is a contribution to improve quality of health care and patient safety.
Objective: The purposes of this study are 1) to understand the nurses' need and perception toward of the monitoring information system of nursing-related patient safety and quality indicators; 2) to establish the monitoring information system of nursing-related patient safety and quality indicators; 3) to evaluate the monitoring information system of nursing-related patient safety and quality indicators. Methods: There will be three phases and the study site in the medical center in northern Taiwan. The first phase is information needs assessment. Researchers will hold the meeting of focus group discussion. The subjects will be the nursing manager, head nurse, clinical nurses who are similar to nursing-related patient safety and quality indicators. The self-conducted semi-structure discussion form will be used to collect the data during the meeting of focus group discussion. The questionnaire will be used to collect the perception, attitude, behavior, satisfaction, time-consuming and the accuracy of nursing-related patient safety and quality indicators data from nurses. The second phase will establish the monitoring information system of nursing-related patient safety and quality indicators and clinical implementation. The third phase will evaluate the effectiveness of the monitoring information system of nursing-related patient safety and quality indicators. The questionnaire will be used to collect the satisfaction, time-consuming and the accuracy of nursing-related patient safety and quality indicators from nurses during the evaluation phase.
Complex service interventions are neither smooth nor easy in any transitioning healthcare facility. Simulations performed in the new environment reinforce patient safety by uncovering safety threats, enabling their correction, and orienting hospital staff. This study expands upon patient safety successes at several institutions to measurably enhance patient safety at upcoming new inpatient facilities.
Avoidable care associated incidents are relatively frequent in primary care. In France for example, avoidable incidents rate is estimated to 22/1000 medical acts from general practitioners. Patient safety is now a growing issue in primary care. One tool to increase patient safety is incident reporting and analysis. It could reduce some important consequences for patients and could allow implementing substantial corrective actions. The aim of the PRisM study is to assess and compare the efficiency of a multifaceted risk management program implemented in the french pluridisciplinary offices in primary care in association with a centralized incident reporting system, versus a centralized incident reporting system only.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two methods, safety curriculum in addition to online training alone, for teaching patient safety to surgery residents. Despite multiple studies evaluating educational safety curricula, the best methods for teaching residents about patient safety is unknown. It is hypothesized that empowering surgery residents to actively engage in behaviors to increase patient safety may lead to a higher quality perioperative care and communication.
The HATRICC study will use mixed methods to implement a standardized process for operating room to intensive care unit handoffs that is accepted and sustainably used by perioperative clinicians.