View clinical trials related to Patient Safety.
Filter by:This randomized, single blinded simulation based study investigates the impact that production pressure can have on the safety of patients undergoing regional anesthesia. We created a high fidelity scenario where anesthesiologists and trainees were to perform a single shot infraclavicular ultrasound guided block. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Participants assigned to the intervention group were exposed to various production pressure generating interventions. The goal of this study was to look at the impact of production pressure on patient safety by scoring anesthesiologists' and trainees' performance and examining the differences between the two groups.
Patients safety and high Quality Performance built up the centre of anesthesiology. Standard operating procedures based on the Helsinki declaration may help to increase the Patient safety and decreased adverse Events or complications.
In 2012, the General Medical Council (GMC) funded PRACtICe (PRevalence And Causes of prescrIbing errors in general practiCe) study, reported that 1 in 20 prescriptions in general practice were found to have a prescribing or monitoring error. The PRACtICe study also proposed some strategies to consider to improve prescribing safety. Further to the PRACtICe study, in line with recommendation from the Medical Research Council (MRC) for developing complex interventions, we conducted a series of focus groups with health care professionals and members of the public to identify possible ways to improve the prescribing education provided for general practitioner (GP) trainees - a group that was identified as likely to benefit from additional education and training in prescribing safety. These focus group discussions identified a pharmacist-led review of the prescribing done by GP trainees, together with feedback, as a promising potential intervention. This intervention, named REVISiT, was piloted with ten trainees and their trainers in the East Midlands. The error rate for the trainees was recorded as 9%. Interviews with the trainees and trainers undertaken following the intervention highlighted that REVISiT was positively received. Some GPs gave examples of how their prescribing practice had changed following the intervention. After this pilot study, we conducted another study involving interviews, focus groups and a stakeholder event with key stakeholders (practice, policy, legal and members of the public) to explore the next steps for REVISiT. Whilst some participants proposed that REVISiT be immediately implemented with minor modifications, others pointed to the need to establish the impact of the intervention more broadly (including its impact in areas other than education and training). Additionally, they highlighted the importance of establishing its effectiveness in order to support making a substantial case for future allocation of resources. Conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) would help establish the effectiveness of the REVISIT intervention and its impact on areas of professional practice that may impact prescribing safety. However, before we can do this, there are components of the REVISiT intervention and RCT process that we need to further explore, test and refine in order for it to be employed on a wider basis. This pilot study of the REVISiT intervention is being undertaken to do this further exploration, testing and refining.
Objective: Analyze health care workers' perception of patient safety during the COVID 19 pandemic. Methodology: Analytical cross-sectional observational study, with a quantitative focus on healthcare workers who are working on-site during the pandemic in the services of healthcare institutions that agree to participate in the countries where the study will be conducted, by applying a survey of patient safety perceptions in healthcare workers in times of pandemic. Analysis of the data will employ descriptive and inferential statistical techniques to meet the objectives of the study using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 25.0 software. Expected results: The study seeks to generate evidence for the perception of patient safety in times of pandemic, for which it will generate the submission of an article with the results obtained to an indexed journal and presentation at a scientific event.
The investigators will leverage implementation science and engineering to adapt, implement, and rigorously evaluate tailored postoperative handoff protocols and implementation strategies. In doing so, the investigators will develop a vital understanding of the factors needed for successful and sustained use of evidence-based interventions in acute care. This knowledge will inform approaches to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap that prevents effective interventions from realizing the promise of improved patient outcomes in acute care settings.
This RCT aims to investigate the real surgical effects of MBP prior to the gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. Those effects include lowest pneumoperitoneum pressure, lowest Trendelenburg inclination angle, the ease of the surgical view and the preferences of the patients with objective measures.
The COVID-19 epidemic is causing a global health crisis. In France, it has imposed a major reorganization of the healthcare system. This emergency reorganization is unprecedented. It involved first, second and third line care. Following this reorganization and from the first days of confinement, a decrease in care activity not related to COVID-19 was observed in médical offices, in emergency services, and in secondary and tertiary care services. This decrease in activity could indicate a decrease in pathologies related to work, transportation or non-COVID-19 infections, due to a favourable effect of lockdown. Nevertheless, some health professionals report the opposite in the media and on social networks, an unusual increase in events (appendicular peritonitis treated late, increase in domestic violence, etc.), while others are surprised by a decrease in activity that is difficult to explain (leukaemia diagnoses by biologists, for example). One hypothesis is that such changes could be related to the reorganisation of the health care system or to the consequences of lockdown. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a systematic collection and analysis of patient safety incidents (also called "adverse events" in France). The objective is to assess the roles of the system and human factors in patient safety, in order to propose changes to the global system and local organisation. In France, there is a system for reporting serious adverse events related to care. Only 4% of the 820 serious adverse events reported in 2018 were reported by primary healthcare professionals (1). However, patient safety incidents in primary care are known to have specific mechanisms, types and mechanisms (2). We hypothesize that the COVID-19 health crisis may have induced unusual patient safety incidents through new mechanisms in a context associating reorganization of the healthcare system and population lockdown. Such a scenario requires the implementation of a massive collection of potential incidents and their systematic and well-structured analysis. Thus, the objective of our study is to describe patient safety incidents related to the reorganization of care and/or lockdown in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis (types, severity, mechanisms) reported by primary care professionals in France. 1. - HAS. Retour d'expérience sur les événements indésirables graves associés à des soins (EIGS) [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 7]. Available from: https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_2882289/fr/retour-d-experience-sur-les-evenements-indesi rables-graves-associes-a-des-soins-eigs 2. - Carson-Stevens A, Hibbert P, Avery A, Butlin A, Carter B, Cooper A, et al. A cross-sectional mixed methods study protocol to generate learning from patient safety incidents reported from general practice. BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 1;5(12):e009079.
The COVID-19 epidemic is causing a global health crisis. In France, it has imposed a major reorganization of the healthcare system. This emergency reorganization is unprecedented. It involved first, second and third line care. Following this reorganization and from the first days of confinement, a decrease in care activity not related to COVID-19 was observed in médical offices, in emergency services, and in secondary and tertiary care services. This decrease in activity could indicate a decrease in pathologies related to work, transportation or non-COVID-19 infections, due to a favourable effect of lockdown. Nevertheless, some health professionals report the opposite in the media and on social networks, an unusual increase in events (appendicular peritonitis treated late, increase in domestic violence, etc.), while others are surprised by a decrease in activity that is difficult to explain (leukaemia diagnoses by biologists, for example). One hypothesis is that such changes could be related to the reorganisation of the health care system or to the consequences of lockdown. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a systematic collection and analysis of patient safety incidents (also called "adverse events" in France). The objective is to assess the roles of the system and human factors in patient safety, in order to propose changes to the global system and local organisation. In France, there is a system for reporting serious adverse events related to care. Only 4% of the 820 serious adverse events reported in 2018 were reported by primary healthcare professionals (1). However, patient safety incidents in primary care are known to have specific mechanisms, types and mechanisms (2). We hypothesize that the COVID-19 health crisis may have induced unusual patient safety incidents through new mechanisms in a context associating reorganization of the healthcare system and population lockdown. Such a scenario requires the implementation of a massive collection of potential incidents and their systematic and well-structured analysis. Thus, the objective of our study is to describe patient safety incidents related to the reorganization of care and/or lockdown in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis (types, severity, mechanisms) reported by general practitioners in France. 1. HAS. Retour d'expérience sur les événements indésirables graves associés à des soins (EIGS) [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 7]. Available from: https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_2882289/fr/retour-d-experience-sur-les-evenements-indesi rables-graves-associes-a-des-soins-eigs 2. Carson-Stevens A, Hibbert P, Avery A, Butlin A, Carter B, Cooper A, et al. A cross-sectional mixed methods study protocol to generate learning from patient safety incidents reported from general practice. BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 1;5(12):e009079.
The investigator hypotheses anesthetic records do not contain detailed information on hemotherapy and blood loss estimation. Therefore anesthetic records will be collected from different institutions and analyzed for items concerning hemotherapy contained.
Many patients, doctors and others worry that tired doctors provide worse patient care, may not learn well and become burnt-out. In response to these concerns, some countries changed their laws to limit work-hours for doctors in training ('residents'). In Canada, most residents work six or seven 24-30h shifts each month. A recent Canadian report ordered by Health Canada said that making good decisions about resident work-hour rules was "significantly limited by quality evidence, especially evidence directly attributable to the Canadian context." Creating this evidence is the main goal of this research. The pilot study in 2 intensive care units(ICU) found that shorter shifts may be worse for patients, and for residents were more tiring than expected but improved wellbeing. Learning was not assessed. Previous studies on resident work-hours report similar findings: conflicting effects for patients, benefits for resident wellbeing, inconsistent and under-studied effects on learning. Overall, these results are not conclusive and confirm the need for a larger study. The current study will provide high-quality Canadian evidence. The investigators will compare two common ICU schedules used in Canada: resident shifts of 16h and 24h. ICU patients are very sick, there is little margin for error: they need doctors who know them well and are thinking clearly. The effects of each schedule on patients and residents will be measured. For patients, mortality rates and harm caused by care in ICU will be studied. For resident education, their learning about managing common illnesses in ICU, to do basic ICU procedures, and communicate with families will be studied. For resident wellbeing measures will include sleepiness, other fatigue symptoms, and burnout. Investigators will study both resident and patient outcomes so that Canadians can understand trade-offs linked to changing schedules. With this knowledge, Canadians can expect safer care for today's patients and better-trained doctors for the patients of tomorrow.