Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Many patients, doctors and others worry that tired doctors provide worse patient care, may not learn well and become burnt-out. In response to these concerns, some countries changed their laws to limit work-hours for doctors in training ('residents'). In Canada, most residents work six or seven 24-30h shifts each month. A recent Canadian report ordered by Health Canada said that making good decisions about resident work-hour rules was "significantly limited by quality evidence, especially evidence directly attributable to the Canadian context." Creating this evidence is the main goal of this research. The pilot study in 2 intensive care units(ICU) found that shorter shifts may be worse for patients, and for residents were more tiring than expected but improved wellbeing. Learning was not assessed. Previous studies on resident work-hours report similar findings: conflicting effects for patients, benefits for resident wellbeing, inconsistent and under-studied effects on learning. Overall, these results are not conclusive and confirm the need for a larger study. The current study will provide high-quality Canadian evidence. The investigators will compare two common ICU schedules used in Canada: resident shifts of 16h and 24h. ICU patients are very sick, there is little margin for error: they need doctors who know them well and are thinking clearly. The effects of each schedule on patients and residents will be measured. For patients, mortality rates and harm caused by care in ICU will be studied. For resident education, their learning about managing common illnesses in ICU, to do basic ICU procedures, and communicate with families will be studied. For resident wellbeing measures will include sleepiness, other fatigue symptoms, and burnout. Investigators will study both resident and patient outcomes so that Canadians can understand trade-offs linked to changing schedules. With this knowledge, Canadians can expect safer care for today's patients and better-trained doctors for the patients of tomorrow.


Clinical Trial Description

Background: Strategies to manage residents' fatigue must balance patient safety, resident education and resident wellbeing. The trade-offs among these are not fully understood. A Canadian cluster-randomized clinical trial will provide urgently needed evidence to inform resident scheduling practice and policy. Previous work questions assumptions used to justify duty hour reduction. The investigators found residents working overnight are fatigued but do sleep, are not chronically sleep deprived, learn effectively immediately after being 'on-call' and learn in a 4-week ICU rotation. The pilot cluster randomized clinical trial of 12, 16 and 24h overnight duty suggests that patient safety is compromised with duty periods shorter than 24h: more harmful errors occurred in the 12h schedule, and residents' knowledge of patients and clinical decisions were worst in the 16h schedule. Mortality was similar. Resident wellbeing was worst in the 24h schedule, suggesting a trade-off between patient safety and resident wellbeing. Education was not assessed. The 8 other randomized clinical trials of physician schedules are from the US; 2 studied residents (the providers of first line overnight medical care in Canadian hospitals), and 6 had low power for important effects on patient outcomes. None found differences in mortality or harmful errors or robustly examined educational outcomes. With Canadian Institutes of Health Research bridge funding the investigators completed a Canada-wide survey showing that most ICU overnight in-house physician staffing is by residents, and a pilot of education outcomes demonstrating the feasibility, responsiveness and discriminative power of competency assessment. Goals: To evaluate the effects of 16h and 24h resident duty schedules on patient mortality and safety, resident education and resident wellbeing. Design: A cluster-randomized crossover trial will compare 16h vs. 24h overnight schedules for residents rotating to ICU. Eligible ICUs will care for adult patients, and are anticipated to have rotating residents performing overnight in-house duty. Intervention: 16h and 24h overnight schedules will both be applied for 52 weeks at each site. Schedule crossover order will be randomly allocated (1:1 ratio). All in-house residents will participate in the schedule. Consent will be obtained for resident measurements. Outcomes: are in 3 domains, Patient, Resident Education and Resident Wellbeing. The primary outcome is hospital mortality to 90 days following index ICU admission. Mortality is objective, patient-relevant, frequent (12-20% in adult ICU) and reflects the quality and safety of care. The main resident education outcome is cognitive reasoning, and the main resident wellbeing outcome is emotional exhaustion. Study of patients and residents in 18 ICUs has power >90% for a 2% difference in mortality and of 90% for important differences in resident education and resident wellbeing. Analyses will use hierarchical regression models to account for clustering by ICU. Expertise: The research team includes experts in patient safety, postgraduate medical education, randomized clinical trials, sleep, and 2 national-level decision-makers. Impact: Key stakeholders actively seek high-quality data about the effects of common overnight schedules on patients and residents. Understanding the benefits and trade-offs will support creation of evidence informed policy about resident schedules and mitigation strategies. This knowledge will improve care for patients and help better train doctors. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04176094
Study type Interventional
Source The Hospital for Sick Children
Contact Jordan Dang
Phone 416-813-7654
Email jordan.dang@sickkids.ca
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date November 18, 2019
Completion date June 2026

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04083924 - Preclinical Medical Student Echocardiography Training American Society of Echocardiography Curriculum N/A
Completed NCT05013476 - Tele-Ultrasound: VIrtual Hands-on Education for Novice Users N/A
Completed NCT03436589 - The Indiana SNAP-Ed Long-term Study N/A
Completed NCT03678077 - Trends in Cohabitation Status, Academic Achievement and Socio-economic Indicators After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Completed NCT05007704 - Competencies Required by Anesthesiologists Managing Critically Ill Patients
Completed NCT04082845 - Effect of Web-Based Training With Thyroidectomy Patients N/A
Completed NCT05335759 - Coaching Programme for Preceptorship of Undergraduate Nurses' Students
Not yet recruiting NCT04959045 - The Effect of Flipped Classroom Teaching Method on Academic Achievement and Skill Learning Level in Skills Education N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03587233 - Are Women With Higher Professional Status More Sedentary Compared to Men? N/A
Recruiting NCT05086783 - Video-based Coaching (VBC) in Gynecologic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT06046378 - The Effect of Digital Stories Prepared With Digital Audio File (Podcast) on Midwifery Learning N/A
Completed NCT04186390 - Learning Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy
Recruiting NCT02377908 - European Postgraduate Training in Geriatric Medicine N/A
Terminated NCT01720017 - Impact of Manikin Training on Airtraq Avant Learning Curve in Predicted Difficult Airways N/A
Completed NCT01001286 - Questscope Non-Formal Education Impact Study Phase 2
Completed NCT00887185 - Validation/Dissemination Of A Temporal Bone Dissection Simulator Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT00425295 - Effectiveness of Human Simulation Training for Medical Crisis Management Skills Phase 1
Completed NCT04343352 - Evaluation of the Efficiency of Mobile Application for Parents of Children With Epilepsy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06091462 - Virtual Reality and Nursing Students and Dementia N/A
Completed NCT05974943 - The Effect of Problem Solving and Decision Making Training Given to Nurses Managers N/A