Advance Care Planning and Care Coordination for People With Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson Disease Clinical Trial

— PD_Pal  

Official title:

Evaluating the Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Combined Person-centred Intervention of Advance Care Planning (ACP) and Care Coordination for People With Parkinson's Disease and Their Family Caregiver(s)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05954013
• Other study ID #: 108177
• Secondary ID: NL8180
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 6, 2020
• Est. completion date: March 17, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: August 2022
• Source: Radboud University Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: People with Parkinson's disease (PD), including parkinsonisms, experience complex motor and non-motor symptoms, which become more hindering in the advanced stages of PD. Advance care planning (ACP) enables individuals to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and serves to ensure that people receive treatment and care that is in line with their preferences during serious chronic illness. The effectiveness of ACP for PD is currently unknown. Methods: The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial, with a parallel group design in seven European countries (Austria, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Sweden and United Kingdom). The "PD_Pal intervention" comprises (1) several consultations with a trained nurse who will perform ACP conversations and support care coordination and (2) use of a patient-directed "Parkinson Support Plan-workbook". The intervention group will be compared to a care-as-usual group. Documented ACP-decisions in the medical records/patient's central file assessed at 6 months after baseline will be the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include patients' and family caregivers' quality of life, perceived care coordination, patients' symptom burden, and cost-effectiveness. Assessments will take place at baseline, 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline. In parallel, we will perform a process evaluation, to understand the feasibility of the intervention. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the PD_Pal intervention will result in an increased number of participants with ACP documentation in the medical records/patient's central file, as compared to care-as-usual. Secondly, the investigators expect that, due to the PD_Pal intervention, patients and their FC will experience better care coordination, better quality of life, a reduced patient symptom burden and the FC will experience a reduction in caregiver burden.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 189
• Est. completion date: March 17, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: March 17, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria for people with Parkinson's disease:

• Capable to participate , meaning that the subject is able to:
• understand information about the decision
• remember that information
• use that information to make a decision
• communicate their decision by talking, using sign language or any other means
• Able to provide informed consent;
• Meeting the MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for PD, including Parkinsonisms;
• Hoehn & Yahr = 3;
• Progressive deterioration in physical and/or cognitive function despite optimal therapy, according to the primary physician; and
• Availability of a family caregiver or informal caregiver.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to communicate independently, with or without supportive communication tools; - Unable or unwilling to commit to study procedures;
• Presence of additional chronic medical illnesses which may require palliative services (e.g. metastatic cancer);
• Already receiving palliative care or hospice services;
• Already participating in a clinical study for palliative care.

Inclusion criteria for family caregivers (FCs):

• Identified by the patient as the person closest to them;
• Willing to provide written informed consent;
• Willing and able to complete questionnaires;
• Aging = 18 years. FC can only participate when the patient participates.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Parkinson Disease
• Parkinsonian Disorders
• Parkinsonism

Intervention

Behavioral:
• PD_Pal intervention
The PD_Pal intervention will be delivered by a nurse that is specifically trained to deliver the PD_Pal intervention, i.e. the PD_Pal nurse. In the PD_Pal intervention, the patient, family caregiver and PD_Pal nurse complete four steps wherein they discuss and compose a: 1) Individual care plan; 2) Proactive care plan; 3) Quality of life and end-of-life plan and; 4) Coordination and revision plan. Together these steps lead to the Parkinson Support Plan. To facilitate patients in taking these steps, all patients receive a Parkinson Support Plan workbook. This workbook consists of information and questions aligned with the four steps. Patients can utilize this workbook before, during, or after the conversations with the PD_Pal nurse.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Austria	Paracelsus Medical University	Salzburg
Estonia	Estonian Movement Disorders Society	Tartu
Germany	Philipps University Marburg Medical Center	Marburg
Greece	University of Ioannina	Ioánnina
Italy	University of Padova	Padova
Sweden	Skane University Hospital	Lund
United Kingdom	University College, London	London

Sponsors (9)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Radboud University Medical Center	Estonian Movement Disorders Society, Mediolanum Cardio Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Philipps University Marburg Medical Center, Skane University Hospital, University College, London, University of Ioannina, University of Padova

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Austria,  Estonia,  Germany,  Greece,  Italy,  Sweden,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Advance care planning documentation in the medical records	Percentage of participants with documented advance care planning (ACP) preferences and wishes in the medical records at 6 months. Only participants who did not have documented ACP at baseline are included in this calculation.	6 months after baseline; score range: 0-100; higher scores indicate higher percentages (though higher scores are not better per definition).
Secondary	Advance care planning documentation in the medical records	Percentage of participants with documented advance care planning (ACP) preferences and wishes in the medical records at 12 months. Only participants who did not have documented ACP at baseline are included in the calculation.	12 months after baseline; score range: 0-100; higher scores indicate higher percentages (though higher scores are not better per definition).
Secondary	Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS)	Change from baseline in palliative phase symptom severity	6 and 12 months after baseline; IPOS score range = 0-64; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale for Parkinson's Disease (ESAS-PD)	Change from baseline in disease specific symptoms	6 months after baseline; ESAS-PD score range = 0-140; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-I)	Change from baseline in depression severity	6 months after baseline; BDI-I score range = 0-63; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)	Change from baseline in quality of life	6 and 12 months after baseline; PDQ-39 score range = 0-100; higher scores are worse
Secondary	EQ-5D-5L (patient)	Change from baseline in self-rated health status in 5 domains	6 and 12 months after baseline; EQ-5D-5L score range = 11111-55555; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Self-rated health status (patient), on a 0-100 point VAS scale	Change from baseline in self-rated health status	6 and 12 months after baseline; score range: 0-100; higher scores indicated better self-rated health status
Secondary	EQ-5D-5L (family caregiver)	Change from baseline of caregiver's health status in 5 domains	6 and 12 months after baseline; EQ-5D-5L score range = 11111-55555; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Quality of life questionnaire for carers - PQoL Carer	Change from baseline in burden experienced by family caregiver	6 and 12 months after baseline; PQoL Carer score range = 0-100; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Modified Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (mNCQ)	Change from baseline in perceived care coordination	6 and 12 months after baseline; mNCQ score range = 1-5; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS)	Change from baseline in quality of care	6 months after baseline; SAPS score range = 0-32; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Experienced involvement in decision making (CollaboRATE)	Change from baseline in experienced involvement in decision making.	6 months after baseline; CollaboRATE score range = 0-5; higher scores are worse
Secondary	MDS Non-Motor Rating Scale (MDS-NMS)	Change from baseline in non-motor symptom severity	6 and 12 months after baseline; MDS-MMS score range = 0-832; higher scores are worse
Secondary	Quality of Dying and Death questionnaire (QoDD), if applicable	Quality of the dying process, experienced by family caregiver	30 days after death of patient; QoDD score range = 0-100; lower scores are worse
Secondary	Resource Utilization questionnaire (RUD) adapted for PD	Change from baseline in resource utilisation	6 and 12 months after baseline; RUD score range not applicable