Parkinson Disease Clinical Trial
— ADROITOfficial title:
Abbott DBS Post-Market Study of Outcomes for Indications Over Time
The purpose of this international study is to evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness of Abbott deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems for all indications, including Parkinson's disease, essential tremor or other disabling tremor and dystonia.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 1000 |
Est. completion date | September 2030 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2029 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject is scheduled for a new implant or IPG device replacement surgery with a market-released Abbott DBS system within 180 days. 2. Subject, or a legally acceptable representative, must provide written informed consent prior to any study-related procedure. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subject is currently enrolled or plans to enroll in an investigational study that may confound the results of this study. 2. Subject has anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the study results. 3. Study center is located in the United States, and indication for DBS implant is not Parkinson's disease or disabling tremor. 4. Study center is located in the United States, and the intended lead implant location is not at, or in close proximity to, the STN, GPi, or VIM thalamus. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Royal Melbourne Hospital - City Campus | Parkville | Victoria |
Australia | Princess Alexandra Hospital | Woolloongabba | Queensland |
Finland | Helsinki University Central Hospital | Helsinki | Uusimaa |
France | CHU Gabriel Montpied | Clermont Ferrand | Auvergne |
France | CHU Hopital Pasteur | Nice | Provence-Alpes-Azur |
France | Fondation Rothchild | Paris | ILE |
France | CHU de St Etienne | Saint-Étienne | Auvergne |
Germany | Medizinische Einrichtungen der Universität Düsseldorf | Düsseldorf | North Rhine-Westphalia |
Germany | UKE Hamburg (Universitatsklinik Eppendorf) | Hamburg | |
Germany | UNIVERSITATSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz | Mainz | Rhineland-Palatinate |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Münster | Münster | North Rhine-Westphalia |
Germany | Universitäts Klinikum Tübingen | Tübingen | Baden-Wurttemberg |
Italy | Az.Osp. Universitaria di Ferrara | Cona | Emilia-Romagna |
Italy | Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta | Milano | Lombardy |
Italy | Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli | Roma | Latium |
Spain | Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol | Badalona | Catalonia |
Spain | Hospital Universitario de la Princesa | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Virgen de Rocio | Sevilla | Andalusia |
Taiwan | Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital | Hualien City | |
Taiwan | Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | LinKou | Ntaiwan |
United Kingdom | Southmead Hospita | Bristol | South West England |
United Kingdom | Queen Elizabeth University Hospital | Glasgow | Wdbtshr |
United Kingdom | The Walton Centre | Liverpool | North West England |
United Kingdom | King's College Hospital | London | |
United States | Albany Medical Center | Albany | New York |
United States | Beth Israe Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Ohio State Medical | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Center for Interventional Pain & Spine | Exton | Pennsylvania |
United States | Wright State University & Premier Health | Fairborn | Ohio |
United States | Texas Movement Disorder Specialist | Georgetown | Texas |
United States | Indiana University | Indianapolis | Indiana |
United States | Kansas University Medical Center | Kansas City | Kansas |
United States | Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire |
United States | Colorado Neurodiagnostics | Littleton | Colorado |
United States | Neurosurgery One | Littleton | Colorado |
United States | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles | California |
United States | University of Louisville | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | University of Miami Hospital | Miami | Florida |
United States | Thomas Jefferson Department or Neurosurgery | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Allegheny General Hospital Department of Neurosurgery | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | University of California at Davis | Sacramento | California |
United States | University of Utah Hospital | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Willis-Knighton Medical Center | Shreveport | Louisiana |
United States | University of South Florida - Department of Neurology | Tampa | Florida |
United States | University of Aizona Health Sciences | Tucson | Arizona |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Abbott Medical Devices |
United States, Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change from baseline to 6 months in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. | The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. | Baseline to 6 months | |
Primary | Change from baseline to1 year in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. | The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. | Baseline to1 year | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 2 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. | The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. | Baseline to 2 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 3 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. | The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. | Baseline to 3 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 4 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. | The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. | Baseline to 4 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 5 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. | The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. | Baseline to 5 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 6 months in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. | The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.
The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. |
Baseline to 6 months | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. | The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. | Baseline to 1 year | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 2 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. | The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. | Baseline to 2 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 3 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. | The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. | Baseline to 3 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 4 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. | The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability. The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. | Baseline to 4 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 5 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. | The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. | Baseline to 5 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 6 months in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. | The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. | Baseline to 6 months | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. | The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. | Baseline to 1 year | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 2 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. | The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. | Baseline to 2 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 3 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. | The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. | Baseline to 3 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 4 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. | The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. | Baseline to 4 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 5 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. | The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. | Baseline to 5 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 6 months in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. | The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. | Baseline to 6 months | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. | The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. | Baseline to 1 year | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 2 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. | The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. | Baseline to 2 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 3 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. | The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. | Baseline to 3 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 4 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. | The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. | Baseline to 4 years | |
Primary | Change from baseline to 5 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. | The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. | Baseline to 5 years | |
Primary | Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 6 months | Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE). a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect. |
At 6 months | |
Primary | Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 1 year | Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE). a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect. |
At 1 year | |
Primary | Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 2 years | Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE). a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect. |
At 2 years | |
Primary | Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 3 years | Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE). a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect. |
At 3 years | |
Primary | Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 4 years | Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE). a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect. |
At 4 years | |
Primary | Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 5 years | Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE). a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect. |
At 5 years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05415774 -
Combined Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04691661 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy Study of Radotinib in Parkinson's Disease
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05754086 -
A Multidimensional Study on Articulation Deficits in Parkinsons Disease
|
||
Completed |
NCT04045925 -
Feasibility Study of the Taïso Practice in Parkinson's Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04194762 -
PARK-FIT. Treadmill vs Cycling in Parkinson´s Disease. Definition of the Most Effective Model in Gait Reeducation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02705755 -
TD-9855 Phase 2 in Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension (nOH)
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03052712 -
Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05830253 -
Free-living Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease Using Smart Objects
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03272230 -
Assessment of Apathy in a Real-life Situation, With a Video and Sensors-based System
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06139965 -
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Comprehensive Coordination Scale in Parkinson's Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT04580849 -
Telerehabilitation Using a Dance Intervention in People With Parkinson's Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03980418 -
Evaluation of a Semiconductor Camera for the DaTSCAN™ Exam
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04477161 -
Effect of Ketone Esters in Parkinson's Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04942392 -
Digital Dance for People With Parkinson's Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03446833 -
LFP Beta aDBS Feasibility Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03497884 -
Individualized Precise Localization of rTMS on Primary Motor Area
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05538455 -
Investigating ProCare4Life Impact on Quality of Life of Elderly Subjects With Neurodegenerative Diseases
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04997642 -
Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Clinical Database
|
||
Completed |
NCT04117737 -
A Pilot Study of Virtual Reality and Antigravity Treadmill for Gait Improvement in Parkinson
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03618901 -
Rock Steady Boxing vs. Sensory Attention Focused Exercise
|
N/A |