View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Diseases.
Filter by:Pancreatic surgery is complicated and risky, especially for pancreatic cancer. It's been noticed that having these surgeries done at specialized centers can lead to better outcomes and survival rates. However, factors like patient selection and hospital conditions also play an important role. Some studies show that more surgeries done at a hospital might not always mean better results, as the type of patients and procedures can vary. To understand this better, the present study compared outcomes and patient characteristics between high-volume pancreatic centers and others.
This is a randomized trial to compare the standard echoendoscope with the newly developed EndoSound Visual System in the evaluation of lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.
Recent improvements in punctures techniques and needles now allow for the collection of high-quality specimens comparable to core needle biopsy. A newly developed motorized fine needle biopsy (mFNB), the Precision-GI (Limaca, Israel) promises intact tissue acquisition without sample damage, relying on controlled axial tissue cutting and high-speed rotational coring for optimized tissue acquisition. Given the advancement mentioned, the investigators aim to compare the performance of the mFNB with the standard needle during the acquisition of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic and liver specimens through a prospective, interventional, single-center trial. The study will consist of two groups of patients: one assigned to the standard fine needle biopsy (FNB) and the other to the mFNB. The primary study outcomes will include sample quality (core integrity), and diagnostic accuracy.
A planned analysis of outcomes among consecutive patients after MIDP from centers participating in the E-MIPS registry (2019-2021). Main outcomes of interest were intraoperative events, major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality.
A planned analysis of outcomes among consecutive patients after MIPD from centers participating in the E-MIPS registry (2019-2021). Main outcomes of interest were major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality.
The goal of the IMPACT project is to set up a data sharing infrastructure between expert centers for pancreatic surgery that enables training, testing and validation of computer science tools to improve quality of care for patients with pancreatic cancer.
This is a prospective cohort study. The investigators enroll subjects with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), individuals at high risk for PDAC, patients with other pancreatic diseases, patients with CA19-9 elevation and controls without pancreatic disease. This study aims to establish a diagnostic prediction model by using elastase 1, common clinical serological examinations, and imaging examinations including endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and to explore the diagnostic ability of the model in the high-risk population of PDAC. Besides, the investigators search for new biomarkers by multi-omics studies of serum and pancreatic tissues to further improve the diagnostic performance of this model. In conclusion, this study seeks a robust diagnostic prediction model to diagnose PDAC, especially early resectable PDAC.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the application of red cell lysis buffer (RCLB) versus conventional sample processing in endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions. The main questions it aims to answer are: whether the application of red cell lysis buffer improves histological tissue quality by decreasing blood contamination. Participants with solid pancreatic lesions who needs histological diagnosis will receive EUS-guided biopsy. The obtained specimens will be processed by RCLB and conventional formalin solution. Researchers will compare the blood contamination score of specimens in RCLB group with the conventional group see if the blood contamination can be improved.
In the existing Aggressive hydration comparison study related to the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), research bias may occur due to the lack of blinding between fluids, so in this study, the investigators will conduct a multicenter randomized comparative study in which the comparative fluids are double-blinded to observe differences between fluids in the preventive effect of pancreatitis that occurs after ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography). A total of 844 patients scheduled for ERCP will be enrolled in this clinical trial and randomly assigned to the lactated Ringer's solution or to the Plasma solution in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients will receive study drug or control drug for up to 24 hours before and after ERCP implementation.
This study is a prospective cohort dedicated to pancreatic diseases excluding cancer. The aim is to develop positive or differential diagnostic tools between benign potentially malignant or malignant pancreatic pathologies. During this study the investigators collect data and biological samples to support research project.