View clinical trials related to Palliative Care.
Filter by:From a scientific view, palliative care issues in dementia are neglected in Germany. Neither in Germany nor internationally research has been conducted on palliative care issues in young onset dementia (YOD), although significant differences compared to late onset dementia (LOD) are expected. Most international studies have focused on patients in long term care (LTC) facilities but have neglected patients that are cared for at home. We hypothesize that in advanced and terminal stages of YOD and LOD unmet care needs exist and that they differ between YOD and LOD. By prospectively assessing and surveying 200 patients with YOD and LOD in advanced stages who are cared for in LTC facilities and at home and investigating circumstances of death of 100 YOD- and LOD-patients, it is possible 1) to describe symptoms and management, health care utilization, palliative care provision, quality of life and death, elements of advance care planning, family caregivers' needs and satisfaction; 2) to compare YOD and LOD; 3) to develop expert-consensus recommendations derived from study results for the improvement and implementation of strategies and interventions for palliative care provision. 4) to communicate the recommendations nationally and internationally in order to improve and adapt guidelines, to implement the recommendations into daily practice and to give a basis and perspectives for future research projects; to communicate the results to patients and their families in order to counsel and support them in their decision making processes and their dialogue with professional caregivers and physicians.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and cost of technology-enhanced transitional palliative care on family caregivers who provide care to a loved one after a hospitalization.
The investigators propose to study the feasibility, acceptability, usability and outcomes of a new clinical decision support system for clinicians of opioid therapy in the context of specialist palliative care for serious chronic illness. The system provides clinicians with patient-specific genetic information on opioid responsiveness and multi-drug interactions. This clinical decision support system should improve the clinician's ability to identify the optimal pain medication and dosage, and reduce risks associated with multi-drug treatment. Investigators will conduct clinician survey's to collection information about the clinical decision support system. Investigators will also conduct patient related questionnaires to determine any benefits or improvements in quality of life and symptom management from the clinical decision support system.
Patients will be identified according to pre-defined trigger criteria for a palliative intervention. One hundred patients of a control group will receive standard intensive care treatment (Usual Care Group). Patients' biopsychosocial problem-related distress will be evaluated and family satisfaction with intensive care will be measured with standardized questionnaires. In the subsequent intervention part of the study one hundred patients will additionally be offered a palliative care treatment (Proactive Care Group) and patients' biopsychosocial problem-related distress as well as family satisfaction will also be evaluated.
For patients with an advanced disease and their families an excellent and compassionate care is essential. However, in hospitals optimal end-of-life care is not yet fully realized and patient's needs are often not met. Palliative care is able to increase patients' quality of life and to carefully meet their and their families' needs. To improve the awareness of unmet needs patient-reported outcome measurement has been the pivot of latest palliative care research. Besides the improvement of care outcome measurement allows the evaluation of the quality of palliative care and comparisons on a national and international level. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the quality of palliative care in different settings (palliative care unit, inpatient and outpatient consultation teams) using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS). The IPOS has been lately developed as improved follow-up version of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) integrating most important questions and simultaneously being brief and comprehensive. The study is planned as a multi-centric observational study. Primary endpoint is the reduction of symptom burden of patients. The clinical study hypothesis bases on the assumption that palliative care can change the symptom burden, measured by a change in the IPOS overall profile score, and that there might be a difference in the size of the effect depending on the caring setting.
The purpose of this study is to pilot the introduction of a newly developed palliative care tool to clinicians in a family health team. The intent of the tool is to improve the quality and comprehensiveness of palliative care, which effects caregiver and patient satisfaction with care received, as well as clinician satisfaction with their delivery of care. Tool effectiveness will be evaluated by measuring satisfaction scores of caregivers, patients and clinicians who receive training and access to the tool compared to caregivers, patients and clinicians providing usual care (without the tool). Uptake of the tool and user feedback will be collected
The study compares early palliative care consultation to standard of care in the medical intensive care unit (ICU). The study will assess if the intervention leads to an increased proportion of clearly delineated goals of care and examine if this intervention leads to decreased healthcare resource utilization such as length of stay, duration of intensive treatments including mechanical ventilation, and hospital re-admissions.
The MEANING trial is a randomized controlled mixed methods pilot designed to compare a novel mindfulness meditation-based intervention (MEANING) to usual care for adults with advanced-stage solid malignancies and their family caregivers.
A quality improvement project compares automatic palliative care consultation compared to standard of care in the medical intensive care unit (ICU). The study will assess if the intervention leads to an increased proportion of clearly delineated goals of care and quality of life and examine if this intervention leads to decreased length of days in the ICU, Hospital, and on mechanical ventilation.
Background: The lack of a holistic approach to palliative care can lead to a fractured sense of dignity at the end of life, resulting in depression, hopelessness, feelings of being a burden to others, and the loss of will to live among terminally-ill patients. Building on the clinical foundation of Dignity Therapy, together with the empirical understanding of dignity-related concerns of Asian families facing terminal-illness, a novel Family Dignity Intervention (FDI) has been developed for Asia palliative care. FDI comprises a recorded interview with a patient and his/her primary family caregiver, which is transcribed, edited into a legacy document, and return to the dyads for sharing with the rest of the patient's family. The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility, acceptability and potential effectiveness of FDI in reducing psychosocial, emotional, spiritual, and psychophysiological distress in community-dwelling and in-patient Asian older terminally-ill patients and their families living in Singapore. Methods/Design: An open-label multicentre randomized controlled trial. 126 patient-family dyads are randomly allocated to one of two groups: (i) intervention group (FDI offered in addition to standard psychological care), and (ii) control group (standard psychological care). Both quantitative and qualitative outcomes are assessed in face-to-face interviews at baseline, three days and two week after intervention, and during an exit interview with family caregivers at two month post bereavement. Primary outcome measures include sense of dignity for patients and psychological distress for caregivers. Secondary outcomes include meaning in life, quality of life, spirituality, hopefulness, perceived support and psychophysiological well-being, as well as bereavement outcomes for caregivers. Qualitative data are analyzed using Framework method. Discussion: To date, there is no available palliative care intervention for dignity enhancement in Asia. This first-of-its kind study develops and tests an evidence-based, family-driven psycho-socio-spiritual intervention for enhancing dignity and wellbeing among Asian patients and families facing mortality. It address a critical gap in the provision of holistic palliative care. The expected outcomes will contribute to advancements in both theories and practices of palliative care for Singapore and other Asian communities around the world.