Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Perineal Massage for Increased Comfort During Pessary Examinations: a Cross-over Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT number | NCT06416982 |
Other study ID # | 24-0544 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 2024 |
Est. completion date | June 2025 |
Pessaries are effective non-surgical devices for reduction of prolapse. However, use of pessaries are limited in some women due to patient discomfort. While lidocaine can be used to improve pessary checks, its use may be limited due to supply chain shortages, lack of insurance coverage, and optimization of resource utilization. More techniques to improve pessary examination comfort are needed. Perineal massage prior to delivery and at the time of active labor has been noted to reduce perineal trauma and perineal discomfort, theoretically by desensitizing the nerve endings in the skin, broadening the vaginal opening, and increasing elasticity of the perineal tissue. Since most discomfort with pessary checks is during removal and insertion through the vaginal introitus, perineal massage may be a beneficial technique that women could potentially learn to improve comfort with pessary checks. The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of perineal massage prior to pessary check in improving comfort of pessary checks for patients using a cross-over randomized controlled trial. Patients who follow up for pessary checks with the division of Urogynecology at UNC will be approached about participating in this study. The study will involve two clinical visits. At the first visit, the patient will be randomized to 2 minutes of perineal massage with water based gel of the external perineum and sides of the vaginal vestibule, as well as internal massage with the thumb, gliding from 4 to 8 o'clock, then tissue stretching technique with one intracavitary finger and other external finger at the 4 o'clock and 8 o'clock positions three times; versus application of gel to the internal vagina and external vagina without massage. Providers will be blinded to randomization and proceed with pessary check as per normal clinical protocols. Patients will rate self-reported pain before, during pessary check, and after the pessary check on a VAS scale; and rate whether they would prefer to repeat this method at future visits via Likert scale. Healthcare professionals will also rate perceived patient pain on VAS scale; ease of pessary removal; and note any perineal or introital laceration or abrasion that may occur during the pessary fitting. At the following visit, patients will be assigned to the group to which they were not initially randomized. Patients and healthcare professionals will again rate pain as described above. Patients will also rank preference for perineal massage using PGI-I.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 68 |
Est. completion date | June 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Undergoing routine pessary management by office providers - Able to provide informed consent (as reported by patient or family member) - Able to follow up with the UNC Urogynecology office for two consecutive pessary examination Exclusion Criteria: - Non-English speaking - Found to have a condition such as significant vaginal erosion that precludes replacement of pessary after exam - Unable to undergo massage due to functional or cognitive impediments or significant discomfort during massage - Regular usage of pain medications for prior pessary checks such as lidocaine, and unwilling to forgo lidocaine for two study visits - Pessary visit for pain, pessary expulsion, or significant bleeding, as per provider's judgement |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | UNC Urogynecology | Raleigh | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Patient discomfort during perineal massage | Participants will be asked rate discomfort during the perineal massage on a VAS pain scale. | At the 3 month follow up visit | |
Primary | Patient-perceived pain | Change in pain scores during pessary check (removal and replacement) compared to baseline pain score prior to pessary check using a visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale, as reported by the participant. The VAS pain scale is a validated scale that is performed by having the participant place a mark on a 10 cm line from 0 to 10 to indicate severity of pain. 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most severe pain. Distance from 0 to the mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction with perineal massage | Participants will be asked to rate satisfaction with perineal massage on a 5-point Likert scale. The 5-point Likert scale is a psychometric response method where respondents can easily answer questions and state their level of agreement in five points. The 5-point Likert scale consists of the below points: (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Patient preference for future perineal massage | Participants will be asked whether they would choose to undergo perineal massage during future visits. Allowed responses will be Yes/No. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Provider-perceived patient discomfort | The provider performing the pessary examination will be asked to rate patient pain before and during the pessary examination (pessary removal and replacement) on a VAS pain scale. The change in pain score during the pessary examination will be compared. The VAS pain scale is a validated scale that is performed by having the provider place a mark on a 10 cm line from 0 to 10 to indicate severity of pain. 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most severe pain. Distance from 0 to the mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Provider-perceived ease of pessary removal | Providers will evaluate ease of pessary removal on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 10 being the most difficult). The ease of pessary removal at the time of the intervention visit will be compared. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Perineal and vaginal abrasion | Providers will be asked to note the presence of any perineal or vaginal abrasions that are thought to be due to pessary removal and/or replacement. The proportion of participants who sustain a perineal or vaginal abrasion will be compared. | 3 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|