State-dependent Interoception, Value-based Decision-making, and Introspection

Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

State-Dependent Interoception, Value-Based Decision Making, and Introspection

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05666726
• Other study ID #: 10000978
• Secondary ID: 000978-M
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 25, 2023
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2026

Study information

• Verified date: June 18, 2024
• Source: National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
• Contact: Silvia Lopez Guzman, M.D.
• Phone: (301) 451-7822
• Email: nimhcdn[@]mail.nih.gov
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Background:

Negative emotional states can affect a person s behavior as they make decisions. For example, hunger may make people more impatient; they may then make riskier choices. Other negative emotional states that can change behavior include stress, pain, and sadness. By learning more about how emotions affect thinking and behavior in healthy people, researchers hope to better understand how to identify and treat people with mental disorders.

Objective:

To learn how negative emotions affect the brain and decision-making behavior.

Eligibility:

Healthy people aged 18 to 55 years.

Design:

Participants will have 3 clinic visits in 3 weeks.

Participants will fill out questionnaires. They will be asked about their personal history, their personality, and state of mind.

For 2 visits, participants will be assigned to different groups. Each group will experience 1 type of emotional stressor:

Some participants will watch a video.

Some will have to do arithmetic problems.

Some will have heat applied to an arm or leg.

Some will experience cold by immersing their hand in ice water.

For a snack craving test, some will be tempted by food after a 4-hour fast.

During these tests, participants will have sensors attached to their bodies. They will be videotaped. Saliva samples will be collected.

After the stressors, participants will do tasks on a computer. They will need to make choices.

Some participants will perform these decision-making tasks while lying in a brain scanner for functional magnetic resonance imaging. The brain scan involves lying on a table that slides into a cylinder that takes images of the brain.

Description:

Study Description:

This study involves a series of experiments consisting of within-subject experimental manipulations of state. In separate sub-studies, we will induce 5 types of negative valence states (negative emotion, loss, pain, stress, and craving) compared to a neutral state to test the hypothesis that negative valence states impact value-based decision-making and the neural mechanisms involved in decision-making.

Objectives:

Primary Objective: Determine the effect of induced negative valence states on value-based decision-making and examine how brain value representation during decision-making is affected by negative valence states.

Secondary Objectives: 1) Determine the role of interoception and metacognition as moderators of the effect of negative valence states on value-based decision-making. 2) Characterize state-specific effects on value-based decision-making. 3) Establish whether states can affect stable features of interoception and metacognition. 4) Build a classification model for state-specific detection using multimodal feature data. 5) Compare interoception across modalities (cardiac, respiratory, pain). 6) Characterize state-specific neuroendocrine profiles for gonadal, stress, and appetitive hormones.

Endpoints:

Primary Endpoints: Choice behavior and brain activations in decision-making tasks: 1) willingness-to-pay, 2) risk aversion, 3) ambiguity

aversion, and 4) delay discounting. For fMRI: 1) VMPFC BOLD, 2) VS BOLD, and 3) AI BOLD signal.

Secondary Endpoints: Behavior and neural activations in an interoceptive task and confidence reports: 1) interoceptive accuracy, 2) confidence bias, and 3) confidence sensitivity.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 900
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2026
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2026
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 55 Years

Eligibility

• INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Subject selections will be equitable among those individuals who meet the inclusion criteria. Every effort will be made to balance gender and race. In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

• Ability of subject to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

• Males and females; Age 18 to 55.

• Able to read and write in English to guarantee understanding of all written and spoken instructions, which are in English.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

For all experiments:

• Unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits

• Has any serious or unstable medical condition or history that in a clinician s assessment implies a cardiovascular, neurological, or physical risk from the study procedures performed to induce negative valence states. This may include chronic systemic disorders that could worsen due to stress (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, coronary artery disease for example a history of myocardial infarction or stable or unstable angina, or diabetes)

• Has any current psychiatric diagnosis (based on SCID) or no diagnosis but scores >=29 on Beck Depression Inventory II or >=26 on Beck Anxiety Inventory

• Meets criteria for diagnosis of any substance-related or addictive disorder, or endorses any kind of problematic gambling behavior or problematic media-based addictive behavior (such as videogames, social-networking, online shopping, etc.)

• Regular use of psychoactive medications or psychoactive substances

• Regular use of corticosteroids

• Is pregnant

• NIMH employees and staff and their immediate family members

For stress and pain induction:

• Has a major medical condition or medical history that in a clinician s assessment could affect temperature sensitivity, pain thresholds, or ability to comply with study procedures. This may include cardiovascular, autonomic, neurological, psychiatric, or chronic systemic disorders (including but not limited to stroke, blindness, deafness, history of brain damage, neurodegenerative, neurotoxic or demyelinating disorder, or diabetes)

• Has a medical condition that in a clinician s assessment might affect somatosensation (e.g., Raynaud s disease, peripheral neuropathy, or circulatory disorder)

For pain induction:

• Has a current chronic pain condition or has had chronic pain in the past (painful condition lasting more than six months)

• Has a dermatological condition such as scars or burns, or has had a tattoo in the testing region within the previous 4 weeks that might influence cutaneous sensibility

• Regular and recent use of prescription or over-the-counter medication that has a significant effect on pain or heat perception. These include medications such as centralacting agents such as opiates (morphine, tramadol), antidepressants (amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran), anticonvulsants (gabapentin, pregabalin), anxiolytics (barbiturates, benzodiazepines), hypnotics (zolpidem, sodium oxybate), antipsychotics (valproate, lithium, olanzapine), antimigraine agents (sumatriptan, ergotamine), and muscle relaxants (cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol). Use of analgesic medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, salicylates, and acetaminophen, taken on an as needed basis is acceptable as long as the last dose taken was within 5 half-lives of testing.

For craving induction:

• Has a condition that in a clinician s assessment could preclude the ability to hold 4-6 hours of fasting or that is associated with a risk of hypoglycemia (such as diabetes, kidney disease, insulinoma, adrenal or pituitary tumors or disorders, or anorexia nervosa)

• Is currently engaged in any kind of diet medically- or self-prescribed or endorses a very strong desire to start a diet that involves eliminating or decreasing carbohydrate consumption

• Has a history of food allergies such as tree-nut or peanut allergy.

For fMRI experiments:

• Individuals with conditions that could pose a risk relating to the safety of the fMRI procedure but do not meet specific exclusion criteria for all experiments or for specific inductions will be excluded from the MRI portion of the protocol but may participate in the non-MRI sessions. Such conditions include:

• Those with ferromagnetic metal in the cranial cavity or eye (e.g. aneurysm clip, implanted neural stimulator, cochlear implant, ocular foreign body)

• Those with an abnormality on a structural MRI

• Those with an implanted cardiac pacemaker or auto-defibrillator

• Those with an insulin pump

• Those with an irremovable body piercing

• Pregnancy (based on urine test completed within 24 hours prior to scan)

• Left-handed (only for fMRI experiments involving thermal pain stimulation)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Craving
• Emotions
• Pain
• Stress

Intervention

Other:
• Pain
Thermal pain
• Stress
Stress state induction

Behavioral:
• Craving
Snack craving induction
• Frustration
Real effort task
• Negative valence emotion
Passive video watching with emotional valence

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	National Institutes of Health Clinical Center	Bethesda	Maryland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Value-based decision-making metrics	Value-based metrics such as delay discounting, which is a measure of an individual's preference for small immediate rewards over larger later rewards.	Right after intervention
Primary	BOLD signal in decision-making areas ROI	BOLD signal related to decision making tasks	Right after intervention
Secondary	Confidence	Level of confidence on the accuracy or optimality of their behavior.	Right after intervention
Secondary	Interoceptive accuracy	Interoceptive accuracy is a measure of an individual's ability to report on bodily sensations with precision.	Right after intervention

External Links

•   NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page