Testing the Effectiveness of a Parent and Child Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Child Venipuncture

Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Both Parents and Children During Child Venipuncture

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03941717
• Other study ID #: REB 5481
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 4, 2019
• Est. completion date: March 13, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: May 2022
• Source: University of Guelph
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study investigates the impact of mindfulness-based intervention for children undergoing a blood-draw and their accompanying parent on (a) child ratings of pain and fear, (b) parent and child ratings of parent distress, and (c) parent perceptions of child pain and fear. Half of the parent-child pairs will receive the mindfulness-based intervention, while half will receive an unfocused-attention task to serve as a comparison with no active component.

Description:

To date, there are no randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving a mindfulness intervention for pediatric acute pain. Moreover, this will be the first study to investigate a parent mindfulness intervention in the context of child acute pain. Within a randomized control trial, the objectives of this study are to test the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention for children undergoing a venipuncture and their accompanying parent on (a) child ratings of pain and fear, (b) parent and child ratings of parent distress, and (c) parent perceptions of child pain and fear. Participants will complete questionnaires immediately before and after child venipuncture. This study aims to offer a novel intervention that may improve both parent and child experience during a stressful situation in which parent and child unmanaged distress has deleterious effects. The long-term objectives of this line of research are to improve extant pain management interventions for children undergoing needle-pokes or other painful procedures. Moderator Aims: To identify possible moderators of a differential treatment outcome (parent and child responses during the needle-poke). These psychological factors include parent and child state catastrophizing, trait experiential avoidance, and trait mindfulness which will be investigated as moderators of the impact of experimental group on the primary outcomes of child self-reported pain and fear, and secondary outcome of parent self-reported distress.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 61
• Est. completion date: March 13, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: March 13, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 7 Years to 12 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Proficiency in English

Exclusion Criteria:

• Major developmental delays in child

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Needle Stick
• Needlestick Injuries
• Pain

Intervention

Other:
• Mindfulness-Based Condition
Each script for the mindfulness-based intervention was slightly modified to fit the context of a venipuncture, and begins with instructions to take deep breaths. Both scripts aim to cultivate present moment awareness of experiences, curiosity, nonjudgement, and acceptance of experiences as they unfold. In particular, the scripts ask that the participant visualize their worries and feelings as a cloud in the sky, and probes for curious thoughts about these experiences. The temporary nature of sensations is described, and the participant is asked to keep this openness and curiosity during the venipuncture.
• Unfocused attention Condition
Each script for the unfocused attention task instructs participants to allow their mind and thoughts to roam. The aim is to encourage the participant to continue thinking and mind wandering as they typically would.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	University of Guelph	Guelph	Ontario

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Guelph	Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (8)

Cahn BR, Polich J. Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Apr;72(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.013. Epub 2008 Sep 23. — View Citation

Garland EL, Hanley A, Farb NA, Froeliger BE. State Mindfulness During Meditation Predicts Enhanced Cognitive Reappraisal. Mindfulness (N Y). 2015 Apr 1;6(2):234-242. — View Citation

Hsieh LY, Chen YR, Lu MC. Efficacy of cold application on pain during chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial: A CONSORT-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(46):e8642. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008642. — View Citation

Pagé MG, Stinson J, Campbell F, Isaac L, Katz J. Identification of pain-related psychological risk factors for the development and maintenance of pediatric chronic postsurgical pain. J Pain Res. 2013;6:167-80. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S40846. Epub 2013 Mar 5. — View Citation

Petter M, Chambers CT, MacLaren Chorney J. The effects of mindfulness-based attention on cold pressor pain in children. Pain Res Manag. 2013 Jan-Feb;18(1):39-45. — View Citation

Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2011). The whole-brain child : 12 revolutionary strategies to nurture your child's developing mind. Delacorte Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/books/about/The_Whole_Brain_Child.html?id=APzgCL8mgHUC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Spann, C. A. (2016). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: the impact of brief interventions on child affect, arousal, and cognition. The University of Texas at Arlington. Retrieved from https://uta-ir.tdl.org/uta-ir/bitstream/handle/10106/25806/SPANN-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Vervoort T, Goubert L, Vandenbossche H, Van Aken S, Matthys D, Crombez G. Child's and parents' catastrophizing about pain is associated with procedural fear in children: a study in children with diabetes and their mothers. Psychol Rep. 2011 Dec;109(3):879-95. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Parent perceptions of child pain	Between group changes in parent report of child pain as rated on a NRS (Vervoort et al., 2011). Parents will be prompted to provide ratings corresponding to how much pain they think their child experienced. The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("a lot of pain").	Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
Other	Parent perceptions of child fear	Between group changes in parent report of child fear as rated on a NRS (Vervoort et al., 2011). Parents will be prompted to provide ratings corresponding to how much pain they think their child experienced. The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not scared") to 10 ("very scared").	Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
Primary	Child pain during the needle: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)	Between group changes in child self-reported pain as rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS has been used to assess pain intensity in children aged 7 and older during acutely painful procedures (Hsieh et al., 2017; Pagé, Stinson, Campbell, Isaac, & Katz, 2013; Vervoort et al., 2011).The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("a lot of pain").	Within two minutes following the needle-poke.
Primary	Child fear during the needle	Between group changes in child self-reported fear as rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS has been used to assess child fear in children aged 7 and older during acutely painful procedures (Hsieh et al., 2017; Vervoort et al., 2011). The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not scared") to 10 ("very scared").	Within two minutes following the needle-poke.
Secondary	Child perceptions of parent distress	Between group changes in child perceptions of parent fear as rated on a NRS (researcher generated). Children will be asked to "Tell us how upset you think your parent was during the needle". This item will be rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("extremely").	Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
Secondary	Parent distress	Between group changes in parent self-report distress as rated on a NRS. Parents will be asked to provide ratings indicating their level of distress experienced on a NRS (researcher generated). For the purpose of the current study, the NRS will ask parents to "Tell us how distressed you were during the needle". The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("extremely").	Within five minutes following the needle-poke.