Development and Clinimetric Properties of the Dutch Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire in Healthy Children

Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Development and Clinimetric Properties of the Dutch Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire in Healthy Children

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03162835
• Other study ID #: Eduvalid Study (Part 1)
• Status: Completed
• Start date: June 12, 2017
• Est. completion date: September 22, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: October 2018
• Source: Vrije Universiteit Brussel
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The scientific objective of this research implies developing and examining the clinimetric properties of the Dutch Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ) in healthy children.

A total study sample of 60 healthy children (30 from 2nd and 3rd primary school) will be included to measure test-retest reliability of the Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ). Children will be asked to fill in the questionnaire twice, with a time interval of 48 hours (assessment T0 and T1).

In order to assess concurrent validity of the PedNPQ, 30 children (15 from 2nd and 3rd primary school) as well as their parent will receive a pediatric Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) session. It is hypothesized that if the developed PedNPQ is valid, children who received PNE will perform better than children receiving no PNE.

To reduce the participant's workload, all assessments will be done immediately after the school hours or during recreation, in the primary school of the participant.

Description:

Pain is a common and daily experience among children that is usually short-term, causing little to moderate discomfort. Yet, a substantial number of children experience chronic pain. Persistent pain periods mainly affect the children's school attendance and participation in recreational activities, possibly leading to academic impairments and social exclusion. Even worse is the children's greater predisposition to develop chronic pain into adulthood. Considering these disadvantages, children suffering from chronic pain should be treated as fast as possible and in the most optimal way. The existing literature on management in children with chronic pain encourages a multidisciplinary approach involving physical therapy and psychological interventions (i.e. cognitive behavioural therapy).

Recently, the application of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) as an intervention on its own, as well as in combination with another form of therapy (such as physiotherapy or cognitive- behavioural therapy) is receiving growing interest in the pediatric field of chronic pain. PNE aims to make people understand how their pain is produced and enables them to integrate this understanding into their everyday lives and subsequent treatment components. This innovative education style has shown to be effective in various adult chronic pain populations, by improving the patients' pain coping strategies and health status, and changing their pain beliefs. Although, no study examined the effectiveness of PNE in the context of chronic pediatric pain. The hypothetical efficacy of pediatric PNE is based on previous findings in adult research that a better understanding of the nature of the illness results in improved patient outcomes. When children do not understand the origin of their pain, they might develop irrational beliefs and fears (including catastrophizing) about their pain, sustaining the vicious circle of chronic pain. Indeed, the information and context in which children perceive their pain, has been shown to modulate pain expectations and emotional response to pain. Since research findings showed that even parental beliefs about the aetiology of the child's pain influences the child's pain outcomes, the role of parents as 'pain modulators' might not be underestimated. Therefore, parents should be involved during PNE.

Before and subsequent to providing children and their parents with PNE, it might be interesting to assess their previous knowledge and the change in knowledge about the neurophysiology of pain. To date, this aspect can be evaluated in adults by using the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ), a questionnaire developed and published by Moseley et al.. This instrument assesses the patients' reconceptualization of pain, and is validated in English and in Dutch. The questionnaire consists of 19 items and was originally based on examination papers of postgraduate medicine students. Various studies have used the NPQ to evaluated pain-related knowledge in adult chronic pain populations, such as chronic low back pain, chronic fatigue syndrome and chronic whiplash associated disorder. Additionally, previous research suggested the use of the NPQ in a study protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of brief education in the prevention of chronic low-back pain in an at-risk population. Noteworthy, the NPQ is also commonly used in clinical practice as a guideline for clinicians during educational sessions about chronic musculoskeletal pain. Previous research has proven adequate clinimetric properties of the English and Dutch version. One study, using a Rash analysis to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the NPQ in an adult chronic spinal population, found the NPQ to have (1) an acceptable internal consistency to assess individuals, (2) to be effective in targeting the ability of a typical group of chronic pain patients, (3) to be a unidimensional scale and (4) to have good test-retest reliability. Examination of the Dutch version showed fair reliability when retesting occurred within 24 hours, acceptable test-retest reliability and one dimensionality of the questionnaire. To conclude, the NPQ has proven to be a reliable and valid measurement instrument for determining the understanding and knowledge of neurophysiology of pain in adult chronic pain populations and healthcare professionals.

Based on this evidence in adults, it may be valuable to develop and examine the clinimetric properties of a Dutch Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ) to determine pain knowledge gaps in children.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 111
• Est. completion date: September 22, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: September 22, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 8 Years to 12 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Healthy children

2. Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Previous pain education

2. Chronic pain

3. Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language

4. Mental retardation

5. Parent with chronic pain

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Child
• Knowledge
• Pain
• Surveys and Questionnaires
• Validation

Intervention

Other:
• Pain Neuroscience Education
Children as well as their parents will receive a +/- 1h one-on-one educational session about the neurophysiology of pain, adjusted to the child's comprehension status. Parents will be present in the PNE session too. The PNE program for children contains two sections: (1) The healthy pain system and its function, divided in subsections each consisting of a specific neurophysiological pain concept (i.e. central nervous system anatomy, nociception and nociceptive pathways, up- and down-regulation of the nervous system) and (2) adaptations of the pain system following persistent pain. To ensure interaction between therapist and child, an interactive board game was developed and used throughout the full educational session.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Belgium	Vrije Universiteit Brussel	Brussels	Jette

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Vrije Universiteit Brussel	Universiteit Antwerpen

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

References & Publications (25)

Adillón C, Lozano È, Salvat I. Comparison of pain neurophysiology knowledge among health sciences students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 22;8:592. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1585-y. — View Citation

Boerner KE, Noel M, Birnie KA, Caes L, Petter M, Chambers CT. Impact of Threat Level, Task Instruction, and Individual Characteristics on Cold Pressor Pain and Fear among Children and Their Parents. Pain Pract. 2016 Jul;16(6):657-68. doi: 10.1111/papr.12306. Epub 2015 May 26. — View Citation

Catley MJ, O'Connell NE, Moseley GL. How good is the neurophysiology of pain questionnaire? A Rasch analysis of psychometric properties. J Pain. 2013 Aug;14(8):818-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 May 4. — View Citation

Goddard JM. Chronic pain in children and young people. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2011 Jun;5(2):158-63. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328345832d. Review. — View Citation

Goodman JE, McGrath PJ. The epidemiology of pain in children and adolescents: a review. Pain. 1991 Sep;46(3):247-64. Review. — View Citation

Jackson T, Pope L, Nagasaka T, Fritch A, Iezzi T, Chen H. The impact of threatening information about pain on coping and pain tolerance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Sep;10(Pt 3):441-51. — View Citation

Korterink JJ, Diederen K, Benninga MA, Tabbers MM. Epidemiology of pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 May 20;10(5):e0126982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126982. eCollection 2015. — View Citation

Landry BW, Fischer PR, Driscoll SW, Koch KM, Harbeck-Weber C, Mack KJ, Wilder RT, Bauer BA, Brandenburg JE. Managing Chronic Pain in Children and Adolescents: A Clinical Review. PM R. 2015 Nov;7(11 Suppl):S295-315. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.006. Review. — View Citation

Louw A, Diener I, Butler DS, Puentedura EJ. The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;92(12):2041-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.198. Review. — View Citation

Meeus M, Nijs J, Van Oosterwijck J, Van Alsenoy V, Truijen S. Pain physiology education improves pain beliefs in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome compared with pacing and self-management education: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Aug;91(8):1153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.020. — View Citation

Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and Future. J Pain. 2015 Sep;16(9):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 5. Review. — View Citation

Moseley GL, Nicholas MK, Hodges PW. A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):324-30. — View Citation

Moseley GL. Evidence for a direct relationship between cognitive and physical change during an education intervention in people with chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2004 Feb;8(1):39-45. — View Citation

Moseley L. Combined physiotherapy and education is efficacious for chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(4):297-302. — View Citation

Moseley L. Unraveling the barriers to reconceptualization of the problem in chronic pain: the actual and perceived ability of patients and health professionals to understand the neurophysiology. J Pain. 2003 May;4(4):184-9. — View Citation

Nijs J, Paul van Wilgen C, Van Oosterwijck J, van Ittersum M, Meeus M. How to explain central sensitization to patients with 'unexplained' chronic musculoskeletal pain: practice guidelines. Man Ther. 2011 Oct;16(5):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 31. — View Citation

Palermo TM, Chambers CT. Parent and family factors in pediatric chronic pain and disability: an integrative approach. Pain. 2005 Dec 15;119(1-3):1-4. Epub 2005 Nov 18. — View Citation

Pergolizzi J, Ahlbeck K, Aldington D, Alon E, Coluzzi F, Dahan A, Huygen F, Kocot-Kepska M, Mangas AC, Mavrocordatos P, Morlion B, Müller-Schwefe G, Nicolaou A, Pérez Hernández C, Sichère P, Schäfer M, Varrassi G. The development of chronic pain: physiological CHANGE necessitates a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Sep;29(9):1127-35. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.810615. Epub 2013 Jul 3. Review. — View Citation

Perquin CW, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AA, Hunfeld JA, Bohnen AM, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, Passchier J, van der Wouden JC. Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience. Pain. 2000 Jul;87(1):51-8. — View Citation

Robins H, Perron V, Heathcote LC, Simons LE. Pain Neuroscience Education: State of the Art and Application in Pediatrics. Children (Basel). 2016 Dec 21;3(4). pii: E43. doi: 10.3390/children3040043. Review. — View Citation

Roth-Isigkeit A, Thyen U, Stöven H, Schwarzenberger J, Schmucker P. Pain among children and adolescents: restrictions in daily living and triggering factors. Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e152-62. Erratum in: Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):1118. — View Citation

Simons LE, Basch MC. State of the art in biobehavioral approaches to the management of chronic pain in childhood. Pain Manag. 2016;6(1):49-61. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.59. Epub 2015 Dec 17. Review. — View Citation

Traeger AC, Moseley GL, Hübscher M, Lee H, Skinner IW, Nicholas MK, Henschke N, Refshauge KM, Blyth FM, Main CJ, Hush JM, Pearce G, McAuley JH. Pain education to prevent chronic low back pain: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 2;4(6):e005505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005505. — View Citation

Van Oosterwijck J, Meeus M, Paul L, De Schryver M, Pascal A, Lambrecht L, Nijs J. Pain physiology education improves health status and endogenous pain inhibition in fibromyalgia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2013 Oct;29(10):873-82. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827c7a7d. — View Citation

Vervoort T, Logan DE, Goubert L, De Clercq B, Hublet A. Severity of pediatric pain in relation to school-related functioning and teacher support: an epidemiological study among school-aged children and adolescents. Pain. 2014 Jun;155(6):1118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 12. — View Citation

* Note: There are 25 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Reliability of the Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ)	In order to evaluate test-retest reliability of the test, the two-way mixed infraclass correlation coefficient will be calculated.	Baseline - 48 hours after baseline
Secondary	Concurrent validity of the Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ)	The validity of the test will be assessed by comparing the test results of the children who received PNE with the children who did not receive PNE.	immediately after Pain Neuroscience education (PNE) (48 hours following baseline)
Secondary	Responsivity of the Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire	The responsivity of the test will be assessed by comparing the child's baseline responses to the test with their responses after Pain Neuroscience Education.	Baseline, immediately after Pain Neuroscience education (PNE) and 1 week following PNE