Exploratory Study to Investigate Cognition Function and Mobility in Individuals With Pain

Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Assessment of Cognitive Function and Mobility in Individuals With Pain

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02974114
• Other study ID #: 204503
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: October 31, 2016
• Est. completion date: February 6, 2017

Study information

• Verified date: March 2018
• Source: GlaxoSmithKline
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This parallel, assessor blind, placebo-controlled, stratified, randomized study will investigate the effects of everyday pain on cognition and mobility in otherwise healthy individuals.

Description:

This study consisted of 3 visits. Visit 1 (Day1, Screening), minimum (min) of 7 days and maximum (max) of 28 days gap followed by Visit 2 (Day 2, pain-state assessment), a recovery period of min of 2 days and max of 30 days followed by Visit 3 (Day 3, pain-free assessment). Participants received treatment once only on Visit 2.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 21
• Est. completion date: February 6, 2017
• Est. primary completion date: February 6, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

• Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.

• Aged between 18-65 years.

• Participant is male or female.

• Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.

• Adequately completes cognition and mobility familiarisation tasks in the opinion of the investigator.

• Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee: No clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon physical examination; absence of any condition that might impact on the participant's safety or wellbeing or affect the individual's ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements; BMI >18.5 and <30 kg/m2

• VISIT 1 ONLY - Has experienced a minimum of two recurrent, acute pain episodes within the past 3 months or is currently suffering from a flare up episode of recurrent, acute pain; VISIT 2 ONLY - A score =5 to question 6 (rated on scale 0-10) on the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form and participants presenting with only one of the following pain types: Joint (Knee, Hip); Back; Headache; Period.

Exclusion Criteria

• Women who are pregnant (Visit 1), women of child bearing potential who test positive on a urine pregnancy test (Visit 1 or Visit 2), females of non-child bearing potential will not be required to complete urinary pregnancy test, post-menopausal females not requiring a pregnancy test will be defined as: Age = 50 years with spontaneous cessation of menses for 12 or more months or age < 55 years and spontaneous menses within the past 1 year, but currently amenorrheic.

• Women who are currently breast-feeding.

• In the opinion of the medical designee, participant suffers from medical condition(s) that may be aggravated due to testing procedures or may impact the interpretation or integrity of data. Conditions related to renal, hepatic, respiratory, blood, immune systems or heart dysfunction will be considered.

• Participant is colour blind.

• Current (within 14 days of the start of the study) or regular use of any prescription, over-the-counter (OTC), herbal medicine unless the medication has been approved by the study physician. OTC analgesics for pain relief and vitamin supplements are permitted only until 48 hours prior to study visits; Current or in the 30 days prior to dosing use of any drug, food, herbal product, or dietary supplement known to induce or inhibit hepatic drug metabolism (e.g. barbiturates, theophylline, cimetidine, or erythromycin) ;Use of analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs 48 hours prior to dosing at Visit 2; Known to be taking any other medication which could counteract with paracetamol and/or caffeine; Current or past use of anti-depressants or psychoactive drugs within the previous 2-years.

• Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.

• Positive breath alcohol test at Visit 2 and positive urine drugs of abuse test at Visit 2.

• Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational product within 7 days of the screening visit or previous participation and randomization in this study.

• Participant has excessive frequent caffeine intake equivalent to 6 cups of brewed coffee or 12 cups of tea per day; Unwilling to abstain from any caffeine products from 4 hours prior to the visit on assessment days (Visit 2 and 3); Current Smoker (or regular nicotine consumption): Participant smokes more than 3 cigarettes per day (or equivalent for e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco or pipes). Investigator will ensure there is no impact of withdrawal effect from those with nicotine dependence; Current Alcohol Consumer: Participant consumes greater than 21 units of alcohol per week (male) and 14 units per week (female) (e.g. Spirit 25ml = 1 unit / AlcoPop 275ml = 1.5 unit / Bottle of beer 330 ml = 1.7 unit / Glass of wine 175ml = 2.1 unit / Pint of beer 568 ml = 3 unit).

• Members of the study site staff or members of their immediate family.

• Any participant who in the opinion of the investigator should not take part in this study.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pain

Intervention

Drug:
• Paracetamol and caffeine
Test product containing 500 mg paracetamol and 65 mg caffeine
• Paracetamol
Test product containing 500 mg paracetamol

Other:
• Placebo
Placebo to match paracetamol 665mg sustained release tablets

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United Kingdom	GSK Investigational Site	Brentford	Middlesex

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
GlaxoSmithKline

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change From Pain Free State (Day 3) in Error Adjusted Simple Reaction Time (SRT) in the Pain State (Day 2)	Error adjusted SRT was one of the main outcomes of the Axon Sports Priming Application. The Axon Sports Priming Application is a computerized test performed on a tablet device that measures cognitive performance, namely psychomotor speed. Axon sports test assessment included 1. Pain-state assessment performed at Visit 2 (Day 2 pre-treatment assessment and post-treatment assessment 1hour [hr] ± 15 minutes [mins] post-dosing) and 2. Pain-free assessment performed at Visit 3 (Day 3).	At Day 2 (pre and post-treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Primary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Reaction Time in the Pain State (Day 2)	The reaction time of five-choice reaction time task (provided by Cambridge Cognition) was measured. In five-choice reaction time task, all the participants hold down a button at the bottom of the screen till a yellow spot appears in one of the five circles at the top of the screen. Participants then released the button and touch inside of the circle where the yellow spot appeared as quickly as they can. The median duration, between the onset of the stimulus and the release of the button, was recorded as reaction time. Calculated for correct, assessed trials where the stimulus appeared in any one of five locations.	At Day 2 (pre and post-treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Primary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Number of One Touch Stockings (OTS) of Cambridge Assessment Problems (on Which the First Box Choice Made Was Correct) in the Pain State (Day 2)	OTS was a measure of executive function and takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. The participant was shown two displays containing three coloured balls. The displays were presented in such a way that they can easily be perceived as stacks of coloured balls held in stockings or socks suspended from a beam. There was a row of numbered boxes along the bottom of the screen. The test administrator first demonstrated to the participant how to use the balls in the lower display to copy the pattern in the upper display, and completed one demonstration problem, where the solution requires one move. The participant then completed three further problems, one each of two moves, three moves, and four moves. Next, the participant was shown further problems, and participants worked out in their head how many moves the solutions to these problems required, and then touch the appropriate box at the bottom of the screen to indicate their response.	At Day 2 (pre and post treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Primary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Attention Switching Task (AST) Congruency Cost in the Pain State (Day 2)	AST was a measure of executive attention. The test displayed an arrow which can appear on either side of the screen and can point in either direction. Each trial displayed a cue at the top of the screen that indicates whether to press the right or left button. Some trials displayed congruent stimuli (e.g. arrow on the right side of the screen pointing to the right) whereas other trials display incongruent stimuli which require a higher cognitive demand (e.g. arrow on the right side of the screen pointing to the left). The AST congruency cost was the difference between the median latencies of response (from stimulus appearance to button press) on the trials that were congruent versus the trials that were incongruent. It was calculated by subtracting the median of congruent from incongruent latency. A positive score indicated response was faster on congruent trials and a negative score indicated response was faster on incongruent trials.	At Day 2 (pre and post treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Primary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Between Errors in the Pain State (Day 2)	SWM task was a measure of working memory. The task involved number of coloured squares (boxes) being shown on the screen. The aim of this test was to find one blue token in the boxes shown to the participants by process of elimination and used these to fill up an empty column on the right-hand side of the screen. The number of boxes gradually increased up to a maximum of eight boxes to search and the colour and position of the boxes changed from trial to trial. SWM between errors was defined as times the participant revisited a box in which a token has previously been found. This was calculated for trials of four, six and eight tokens.	At Day 2 (pre and post treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Primary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Rapid Visual Information Processing A Prime (RVPA) in the Pain State (Day 2)	RVP task was measures of attention. A white box appeared in the centre of the computer screen, inside which digits, from 2 to 9, appeared in a pseudo-random order, at the rate of 100 digits per minute. Participants were requested to detect target sequences of digits (for example, 2-4-6, 3-5-7, 4-6-8) and to register responses using the press pad. The RVPA (A prime) was the signal detection measure of sensitivity to the target, regardless of response tendency (the expected range will be 0.00 to 1.00; bad to good). RVP metric was a measure of how good the subject was at detecting target sequences.	At Day 2 (pre and post treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Secondary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Grip Force in Pain State (Day 2)	This task was a measure of grip strength. The participant held the dynamometer in their dominant hand and the arm was swung from above the head to by the side of the body. If the dominant arm or hand was painful then the non-dominant hand was used. The participant was instructed to assert maximum effort during the squeezing motion and maintain it for about 4 seconds using a metronome. Participant conducted the movement 4-times (1 practice effort and 3 test efforts) and there was a 1-minute recovery period between each effort.	At Day 2 (pre and post-treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Secondary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Time to Standing in Pain State (Day 2)	Time to standing provides a simple assessment of physical mobility. From a seated position with arms crossed so that the right hand is placed on the left shoulder and the left hand on the right shoulder, participants stood to a fully erect stature in as short a time as possible. Time to standing recorded which was measured using a stopwatch. Participants conducted the same movement 3-times continuously as a practice effort and 5-times continuously as a test effort at each visit. There was a 1-minute rest between the practice and test effort.	At Day 2 (pre and post treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Secondary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Ground Reaction Force (GRF) in Pain State (Day 2)	From a seated position with arms crossed so that the right hand is placed on the left shoulder and the left hand on the right shoulder, participants stood to a fully erect stature in as short a time as possible. Participants conducted the same movement 3-times continuously as a practice effort and 5-times continuously as a test effort at each visit. There was a 1-minute rest between the practice and test effort. GRF was measured during the movement analyzed using a force plate interfaced with a computer.	At Day 2 (pre and post treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Secondary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Contact Phase in Pain State (Day 2)	Participants performed a walking assessment in comfortable walking shoes to measure gait parameter contact phase. An athletic movement analysis system (Optojump, Microgate) was utilized which set up over a 15 meters (m) length of track with only the 5-10m section measured and analysed. Participants were instructed to walk the 15m length a minimum of 6 times (3 practice and a minimum of 3 test walks) always entering the 15m length with the same foot first. The foot (left or right) entering the 5-10m section first was recorded by visual assessment of the Optojump operator for the test walks. Test walks were repeated until there were 3 walks in which the participants have entered the 5-10m section with the same foot first.	At Day 2 (pre and post treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Secondary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Stride Length in Pain State (Day 2)	Participants performed a walking assessment in comfortable walking shoes to measure gait parameter stride length. An athletic movement analysis system (Optojump, Microgate) was utilized which set up over a 15 meters (m) length of track with only the 5-10m section measured and analysed. Participants were instructed to walk the 15m length a minimum of 6 times (3 practice and a minimum of 3 test walks) always entering the 15m length with the same foot first. The foot (left or right) entering the 5-10m section first was recorded by visual assessment of the Optojump operator for the test walks. Test walks were repeated until there were 3 walks in which the participants have entered the 5-10m section with the same foot first.	At Day 2 (pre and post treatment) and Day 3 of the study
Secondary	Change From Pain-free State (Day 3) in Walking Speed in Pain State (Day 2)	Participants performed a walking assessment in comfortable walking shoes to measure gait parameter walking speed over 5-10m for each foot. An athletic movement analysis system (Optojump, Microgate) was utilized which set up over a 15 meters (m) length of track with only the 5-10m section measured and analysed. Participants were instructed to walk the 15m length a minimum of 6 times (3 practice and a minimum of 3 test walks) always entering the 15m length with the same foot first. The foot (left or right) entering the 5-10m section first was recorded by visual assessment of the Optojump operator for the test walks. Test walks were repeated until there were 3 walks in which the participants have entered the 5-10m section with the same foot first.	At Day 2 (pre and post-treatment) and Day 3