Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effectiveness and Feasibility of Patient Controlled Analgesia in the ED
| Verified date | November 2020 |
| Source | Albert Einstein College of Medicine |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
Background: Inadequate pain management is common in the Emergency Department (ED). Optimal treatment of pain necessitates titration to effective dose due to the large inter-individual variability in opioid requirement. However nurse administered titration is difficult to provide in this setting due to high patient to nurse and physician ratios and multiple urgent competing patient demands. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) lets ED patients actively participate in pain management by allowing self-titration to their desired level of pain relief. A tightly controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) recently completed by the investigators group provides promising preliminary support for the efficacy and safety of PCA for patients with abdominal pain at a single ED with a dedicated research nurse and standard loading dose given to all patients. Objective: The overall objective is to provide optimal pain management in the ED. Specific aims: 1)To compare the effectiveness and safety of PCA and non-PCA opioid analgesia when nurses involved in clinical care deliver the intervention to a broad group of ED patients with acute pain at multiple clinical centers. The primary hypothesis is that there will be a greater decline in pain over time and similar safety in patients randomized to receive PCA compared to patients receiving standard opioid analgesia. 2) To describe the feasibility of PCA in terms of patient and provider acceptance, resource utilization and cost associated with PCA. Innovation: PCA represents a novel shift from the current provider-driven model of ED pain management to one in which the patient is an active participant. Few prior studies have evaluated ED PCA and no systematic evaluation of time and resources exists. Methodology: An RCT will be performed at 3 clinical centers. 750 patients with acute pain warranting IV opioid administration will be randomized to receive usual opioid analgesia determined by the provider or PCA (loading dose 0.1 mg/kg morphine and demand dose of 1 mg morphine available every 6 minutes). Pain intensity will be measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) recorded every half hour up to 2 hours after initial opioid administration. Primary endpoints are rate of change in pain intensity from 30 minutes after initial administration of opioid to 2 hours as suggested by the results of the preliminary study and incidence of adverse events. PCA will also be compared to non-PCA opioid analgesia assessed at the end of the 2 hour study period by patient satisfaction with pain management; registered nurse (RN) assessment of time efficiency/ease of use and satisfaction with pain management; and physician satisfaction with pain management. Resource utilization and cost associated with implementation and use of PCA in the ED setting will be assessed by total Registered nurse (RN) time spent on pain management per patient; pharmacy preparation time per patient; material cost per patient and Registered Nurse and Physician training time necessary for PCA implementation. Significance: If PCA is demonstrated to be effective, safe, and associated with patient and provider acceptance and acceptable resource utilization, it has the potential to significantly improve ED pain management.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 636 |
| Est. completion date | February 2016 |
| Est. primary completion date | February 2016 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18 to 65 2. Patient deemed by the ED attending physician to require IV opioid analgesia for pain and for whom the ED Attending Physician would consider using PCA Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients requiring initial resuscitation that would preclude the use of PCA 2. Long-term use of prescription or non-prescription opioids now or within the past year 3. Recent opioid use within the past 24 hours 4. Chronic pain syndromes 5. Clinician suspicion of current or past opioid dependence/abuse 6. Altered mental status/Clinical suspicion of intoxication 7. Patients expected to require conscious sedation while in the ED 8. Pregnancy or breast-feeding 9. History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of sleep apnea syndrome, baseline oxygen saturation (room air) < 97% 10. Systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg 11. Use of sedative medications e.g. benzodiazepines, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, phenothiazines, or tricyclic antidepressants. 12. History of renal insufficiency/renal failure 13. Prior allergic reaction to morphine 14. Inability to provide informed consent or inability to understand or operate PCA device 15. Previous entry of patient into study |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Jacobi Medical Center | Bronx | New York |
| United States | Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Division | Bronx | New York |
| United States | University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Albert Einstein College of Medicine | Jacobi Medical Center, Montefiore Medical Center, National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), University of Pennsylvania |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Nurse Preference for PCA or Conventional Administration of IV Opioids | Single question about preference for PCA versus preference for conventional administration of IV opioids. | 2 hours | |
| Other | Physician Preference for PCA or Usual Care | Single question about physician preference for PCA or conventional administration of IV opioids | 2 hours | |
| Primary | Rate of Change in Pain Intensity Per Hour | Rate of Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of Pain per hour where 0 indicates "no pain", 10 indicates "worst possible pain" between 30 minutes and 120 minutes post-baseline i.e. NRS at 30 minutes minus NRS at 120 minutes post-baseline. | 1.5 hours | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events | Number of participants with one or more adverse events defined by: oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry < 92% for one minute or more, respiratory rate <10 breaths/min counted for 60 seconds, or systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg. | 2 hours | |
| Secondary | Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management | Self report of satisfaction with treatment at120 minutes after baseline | 2 hours |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|