Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01362491
Other study ID # AH-11-16
Secondary ID B3411007
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received May 19, 2011
Last updated July 29, 2014
Start date June 2011
Est. completion date March 2012

Study information

Verified date July 2014
Source Pfizer
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will compare the ability of a single-dose of a novel ibuprofen formulation to relieve pain compared to placebo and standard ibuprofen in the treatment of tension-type headache


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 226
Est. completion date March 2012
Est. primary completion date March 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Males and females at least 18 years to 65 years of age

- A diagnosis of an episodic tension-type headache, as defined by the International Headache Society

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pregnancy or breast-feeding

- Alcohol or substance abuse

- Any serious medical or psychiatric disorder

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Ibuprofen Sodium
Single-dose of ibuprofen sodium tablets (equal to 400 mg ibuprofen)
Standard Ibuprofen
Single-dose of standard ibuprofen tablets (400mg)
Placebo
Single-dose of placebo

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Pfizer Investigational Site Philadelphia Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Pfizer

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating and Pain Intensity Difference From 0-3 Hours (SPRID 0-3) for Ibuprofen Sodium Versus Placebo Tablet SPRID:time-weighted sum of pain relief rating combined with pain intensity difference (PRID) over 3 hours. SPRID score range:-3 (worst) to 21 (best) for SPRID 0-3. PRID: sum of pain intensity differences (PID) and pain relief rating(PRR) at each time point. PRID score range: -1=worst to 7=best. PID: baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at a given time point (score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderately severe to 3=severe). Total score range for PID: -1(worst) to 3 (best). PRR:assessed on 5-point pain relief rating scale (0=No relief to 4=Complete relief). 0-3 Hours No
Primary Time to Onset of Meaningful Relief for Ibuprofen Sodium Versus Ibuprofen (Motrin IB) Tablet Participants evaluated the time to meaningful relief by stopping a second stopwatch labeled 'meaningful relief' at the moment the participant first began to experience meaningful relief. It was also considered achieved if the participant stated "meaningful relief" at the time the first stopwatch was depressed. Stopwatch was active up to 3 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. 0 to 3 hours No
Secondary Time to Onset of Meaningful Relief: Remaining Comparisons Participants evaluated the time to meaningful relief by stopping a second stopwatch labeled 'meaningful relief' at the moment the participant first began to experience meaningful relief. It was also considered achieved if the participant stated "meaningful relief" at the time the first stopwatch was depressed. Stopwatch was active up to 3 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. 0 to 3 hours No
Secondary Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Relief Participants evaluated the time to first perceptible relief by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'first perceptible relief' at the moment the participant first began to experience any relief. Stopwatch was active up to 3 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. First perceptible relief was considered confirmed by meaningful relief if the participant achieved both "first perceptible" and "meaningful" relief by either depressing the second stopwatch or by indicating that his/her "first perceptible" relief was also "meaningful". 0 to 3 hours No
Secondary Pain Relief Rating (PRR) PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale wherein 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief. 1, 2 & 3 hours post-dose No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time point [pain severity score range 0 (none) to 3 (severe)] from the baseline score [Baseline pain severity score range 2 (moderately severe) to 3 (severe)]. Total possible score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best). 1, 2 & 3 hours post-dose No
Secondary Sum of Pain Relief Rating and Pain Intensity Difference (PRID) PRID was sum of PID and PRR at each post-dosing time point. The overall possible score range, for PRID was -1 (worst) to 7 (best). PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time point [pain severity score range 0 (none) to 3 (severe)] from the baseline score [Baseline pain severity score range 2 (moderately severe) to 3 (severe)]. Total possible score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best). PRR was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale (0=No relief to 4=Complete relief). 1, 2 & 3 hours post-dose No
Secondary Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) SPID: time-weighted sum of PID over 2 and 3 hours. SPID score range was -2(worst) to 6 (best) for SPID 0-2 and -3 (worst) to 9 (best) for SPID 0-3. PID: baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at a given time point (score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderately severe to 3=severe). Total score range for PID: -1(worst) to 3 (best). 0 to 2, 0 to 3 hours No
Secondary Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating (TOTPAR) TOTPAR: time-weighted sum of PRR over 2 and 3 hours. TOTPAR score range was 0 (worst) to 8 (best) for TOTPAR 0-2 and 0 (worst) to 12 (best) for TOTPAR 0-3. PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale wherein 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief. 0 to 2, 0 to 3 hours No
Secondary Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating and Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) SPRID: time-weighted sum of PRID over 2 and 3 hours. SPRID score range was -2(worst) to 14(best) for SPRID 0-2 and -3 (worst) to 21 (best) for SPRID 0-3. PRID: sum of PID and PRR at each time point. Total score range for PRID: -1=worst to 7=best. PID: baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at a given time point (score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderately severe to 3=severe). Total score range for PID: -1(worst) to 3(best), PRR: assessed on 5-point pain relief rating scale (0=No relief to 4=Complete relief). 0 to 2, 0 to 3 hours No
Secondary Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Relief Percentage of participants with meaningful relief evaluated by stopping a second stopwatch labeled 'meaningful relief' at the moment the participant first began to experience meaningful relief. It was also considered achieved if the participant stated "meaningful relief" at the time the first stopwatch was depressed. Stopwatch was active up to 3 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours No
Secondary Cumulative Percentage of Participants With First Perceptible Relief Percentage of participants with first perceptible relief evaluated by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'first perceptible relief' at the moment the participant first began to experience any relief. Stopwatch was active up to 3 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. First perceptible relief was considered confirmed by meaningful relief if the participant achieved both "first perceptible" and "meaningful" relief by either depressing the second stopwatch or by indicating that his/her "first perceptible" relief was also "meaningful". 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours No
Secondary Duration of Relief Median participant time for dropping out of the study due to lack of efficacy or receipt of rescue medication, whichever came first. 0 to 3 hours No
Secondary Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Percentage of participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy or received rescue medication. 1, 2, 3 hours post-dose No
Secondary Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Complete Relief Complete relief was defined as a PRR of 4. PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale where 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief 1, 2, & 3 hours post-dose No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Terminated NCT04356352 - Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04748367 - Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care N/A
Completed NCT05057988 - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04466111 - Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
Recruiting NCT06206252 - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Completed NCT05868122 - A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06087432 - Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05508594 - Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03931772 - Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT02913027 - Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams? N/A
Terminated NCT02181387 - Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor? Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06032559 - Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03613155 - Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care