Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of A Novel Ibuprofen Formulation In The Treatment Of Post-Surgical Dental Pain
| Verified date | July 2012 |
| Source | Pfizer |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
| Study type | Interventional |
This study will compare the analgesic efficacy of a single-dose of a novel ibuprofen formulation to placebo and acetaminophen in the treatment of post-surgical dental pain following "wisdom" tooth (third molar) removal.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 218 |
| Est. completion date | January 2011 |
| Est. primary completion date | January 2011 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 16 Years to 40 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Normal, healthy males and females 16 to 40 years of age - Outpatients who have moderate to severe post-operative pain (confirmed by a Visual Analog Scale-Pain Severity Rating [VAS-PSR] score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS PSR) following surgical extraction of two or more third molars, at least one of which must be a partial or complete bony mandibular impaction - Use of only the following pre-operative medication(s)/anesthetic(s): topical benzocaine, a short acting parenteral (local) anesthetic (mepivacaine or lidocaine) with or without vasoconstrictor and/or nitrous oxide Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy or breast-feeding - Alcohol or substance abuse - Any serious medical or psychiatric disorder - History of stomach ulcers, stomach bleed, or other bleeding disorders - Use of a prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) drug with which administration of ibuprofen or any other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID); acetaminophen (APAP); or codeine or any other opioid is contraindicated (including: opioids, antipsychotics, antianxiety agents, or other central nervous system depressants [including alcohol]) |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Salt Lake City | Utah |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Pfizer |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating With Pain Intensity Difference From 0 to 6 Hours (SPRID 0-6) | SPRID: time-weighted sum of pain relief rating combined with pain intensity difference (PRID) over 6 hours. Score range: -6(worst) to 42(best) for SPRID 0-6. PRID: sum of pain intensity difference (PID) and pain relief rating (PRR) at each time point. Score range for PRID: -1(worst) to 7(best). PID: baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at a given time point (score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderate to 3=severe). Total score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best). PRR: assessed on 5-point pain relief rating scale (0=No relief to 4=Complete relief). | 0 to 6 hours | No |
| Primary | Time to Onset of Meaningful Relief | Participants evaluated the time to meaningful relief by stopping a second stopwatch labeled 'meaningful relief' at the moment they first began to experience meaningful relief. Stopwatch was active up to 6 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. | 0 to 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Relief | Participants evaluated the time to first perceptible relief by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'first perceptible relief' at the moment they first began to experience any relief. Stopwatch was active up to 6 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. The first perceptible relief was considered confirmed if the participant also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief. | 0 to 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Pain Relief Rating (PRR) | PRR was evaluated at different time points during the study up to 6 hours after taking the study medication, and immediately before rescue medication was taken (if necessary). PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale where 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief. | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Pain Intensity Difference (PID) | PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time point (pain severity score range 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) from the baseline score (Baseline pain severity score range 2 [moderate] to 3 [severe]). Total possible score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best). | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Sum of Pain Relief Rating and Pain Intensity Difference (PRID) | PRID was sum of PID and PRR at each post-dosing time point. The overall possible score range, for PRID was -1 (worst) to 7 (best). PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time point (pain severity score range 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) from the baseline score (Baseline pain severity score range 2 [moderate] to 3 [severe]). Total possible score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best). PRR was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale (0=No relief to 4=Complete relief). | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) | SPID: time-weighted sum of PID over 2, 3 and 6 hours. Total score range: -2 (worst) to 6 (best) for SPID 0-2, -3 (worst) to 9 (best) for SPID 0-3, and -6 (worst) to 18 (best) for SPID 0-6. PID: baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at a given time point (score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderate to 3=severe). Total score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best). | 0 to 2, 0 to 3, 0 to 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating (TOTPAR) | TOTPAR: time-weighted sum of PRR over 2, 3, and 6 hours. Total score range: 0 (worst) to 8 (best) for TOTPAR 0-2, 0 (worst) to 12 (best) for TOTPAR 0-3, and 0 (worst) to 24 (best) for TOTPAR 0-6. PRR was evaluated at different time points during the study up to 6 hours, and immediately after taking rescue medication (if necessary). PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale where 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief. | 0 to 2, 0 to 3, 0 to 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating and Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) | SPRID: time-weighted sum of PRID over 2 and 3 hours. Total score range: -2 (worst) to 14 (best) for SPRID 0-2, and -3 (worst) to 21 (best) for SPRID 0-3. PRID: sum of PID and PRR at each time point. Total score range for PRID: -1=worst to 7=best. PID: baseline pain severity score minus pain severity score at a given time point (score range 0=none to 3=severe; baseline score range 2=moderate to 3=severe). Total score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best). PRR: assessed on 5-point pain relief rating scale (0=No relief to 4=Complete relief). | 0 to 2, 0 to 3 hours | No |
| Secondary | Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Relief | Percentage of participants with meaningful relief evaluated by stopping the stopwatch labeled 'meaningful relief' at the moment participant first began to experience meaningful relief. Stopwatch was active up to 6 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Confirmed First Perceptible Relief | Percentage of participants with first perceptible relief evaluated by stopping the stopwatch labeled 'first perceptible relief' at the moment participant first began to experience any relief. First perceptible relief was considered confirmed if the participant also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief. Stopwatch was active up to 6 hours after dosing or until stopped by the participant, or rescue medication was administered. | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Time to Treatment Failure | Median time of dropping out of the participants from the study due to lack of efficacy or use of rescue medication, whichever comes first. | 0 to 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure | Percentage of participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy or received rescue medication. | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Complete Relief | Complete relief was defined as a PRR of 4. PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale where 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief. | 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours | No |
| Secondary | Participant Global Evaluation of Study Medication | Participant global evaluation of study medication was performed at the 6-hour time point or immediately before taking the rescue medication. It was scored on a 6-point categorical scale where 0 = Very poor, 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, and 5 = Excellent. | 6 hours | No |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|