Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01115673
Other study ID # ACEPAI2001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received April 30, 2010
Last updated April 26, 2012
Start date June 2010
Est. completion date January 2011

Study information

Verified date April 2012
Source Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of acetaminophen 650 mg and acetaminophen 1000 mg in dental surgery.


Description:

This trial is to assess the relative efficacy of acetaminophen 1000 mg versus acetaminophen 650 mg over a six-hour period, in subjects experiencing at least moderate post-operative dental pain.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 540
Est. completion date January 2011
Est. primary completion date January 2011
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 16 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Must be at least 16 and less than 51 years of age

- Must weigh at least 100 lbs with a body mass index of at least 18 and less than 30

- Must have up to four of their back teeth (third-molars) pulled

Exclusion Criteria:

- Cannot be allergic to acetaminophen (Tylenol)

- Cannot be pregnant (or planning to be pregnant) or nursing a baby

- Cannot have any other medical conditions that the investigator determines might compromise your safety or the study results

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen Caplet - single dose
Placebo Control
0 mg Caplet - single dose

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Jean Brown Research Salt Lake City Utah

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division of McNEIL-PPC, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Overall Analgesic Efficacy - Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores Over Six Hours (SPRID6) Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores Over Six Hours (SPRID6) - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief. For SPRID6, the total possible minimum value is -300 (worst) and the total possible maximum value is 1200 (best). The weights used in the calculation of weighted sums were equal to the elapsed time (hour) between the time point of interest and the preceding time point. 6 Hours No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Over Six Hours (SPID6) Weighted Sum of the Pain Intensity Difference from Baseline Over Six Hours (SPID6) - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain. The total possible minimum value is -300 (worst) and the total possible maximum value is 600 (best). The weights used in the calculation of weighted sums were equal to the elapsed time (hour) between the time point of interest and the preceding time point. 6 Hours No
Secondary Sum of Pain Relief Scores Over Six Hours (TOTPAR6) Weighted Sum of the Pain Relief Scores Over Six Hours (TOTPAR6) - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief. The total possible minimum value is 0 (worst) and the total possible maximum value is 600 (best). The weights used in the calculation of weighted sums were equal to the elapsed time (hour) between the time point of interest and the preceding time point. 6 Hours No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 15 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 15 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 30 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 30 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 45 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 45 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 60 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 60 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 75 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time Point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 75 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 90 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 90 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 120 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 120 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 180 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 180 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 240 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 240 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 300 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 300 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 360 Minutes Pain Intensity Difference (PID) from Baseline at Each Assessment Time point - pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain with a highest possible score of 100. The pain intensity difference was calculated at each time point as the pain intensity score at baseline minus the pain intensity score at the stated time point. 360 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 15 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 15 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 30 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 30 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 45 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 45 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 60 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 60 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 75 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 75 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 90 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 90 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 120 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 120 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 180 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 180 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 240 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 240 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 300 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 300 Minutes No
Secondary Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 360 Minutes Pain Relief Scores at each Assessment Timepoint - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 100 360 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 15 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 15 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 30 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 30 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 45 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 45 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 60 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 60 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 75 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 75 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 90 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 90 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 120 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 120 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 180 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 180 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 240 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 240 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 300 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 300 Minutes No
Secondary Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) at 360 Minutes Sum of PID and PAR Scores (PRID) at each Assessment Time point - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief 360 Minutes No
Secondary Time to Meaningful Pain Relief Minutes until meaningful pain relief was achieved. A stopwatch was provided to the subject after ingestion of the study medication. The subject was instructed to stop the stopwatch when the relief from the starting pain was meaningful to them. within 6 Hours No
Secondary Time to Confirmed Perceptible Pain Relief Minutes until confirmed perceptible pain relief was achieved. A stopwatch was provided to the subject after ingestion of the study medication. The subject was instructed to stop the stopwatch when they first began to feel any pain relieving effect whatsoever of the drug, that was when they first felt any pain relief. It did not necessarily mean they felt completely better, although they might have, but when they first felt any difference in the pain. within 6 Hours No
Secondary Duration of Analgesia - Time to Rescue Minutes until rescue medication was given. within 6 Hours No
Secondary Rescue Rates Through Four Hours Percentage of subjects using rescue medication. through 4 Hours No
Secondary Rescue Rates Through Six Hours Percentage of subjects using rescue medication. through 6 Hours No
Secondary Percentage of Subjects With >50% of the Maximum Possible TOTPAR6 Score Percentage of Subjects with >50% of the Maximum Possible TOTPAR6 Score - pain relief was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief with a highest possible score of 600 so >50% is >300 out of 600 6 Hours No
Secondary Patient Global Evaluation Patient Assessment of the Pain Medication - Number of Subjects rating the medication they received as a pain reliever on a score of 0-4, where 0=poor, 1=fair, 2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent 6 Hours No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Terminated NCT04356352 - Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04748367 - Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care N/A
Completed NCT05057988 - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04466111 - Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
Recruiting NCT06206252 - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Completed NCT05868122 - A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06087432 - Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05508594 - Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03931772 - Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT02913027 - Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams? N/A
Terminated NCT02181387 - Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor? Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06032559 - Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03613155 - Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care