Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00121498
Other study ID # 1571CTIL
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received July 13, 2005
Last updated September 12, 2005
Start date November 2002
Est. completion date September 2003

Study information

Verified date December 2004
Source Rambam Health Care Campus
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Israel: Israeli Health Ministry Pharmaceutical Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Preemptive analgesia is defined as “analgesic intervention provided before surgery to prevent or reduce subsequent pain”. By preventing central sensitization using nociceptive blockers by regional analgesia we may able to produce a painless postsurgical state. The use of preemptive analgesia was reported in various surgical procedures, such as in limb surgeries, laparoscopic procedures, mastectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Regarding abdominal hysterectomy there are only few reports, however both, malignancies and benign cases were included and conflicting results were obtained regarding the value of preemptive analgesia. Since hysterectomy is the most frequent major surgical procedure performed in gynecology, and it is estimated that by age 64 years, 40 % of women will have had a hysterectomy, it would be of great value to optimize pain treatment in these patients.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia in women who undergo a transabdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine abnormalities.

Hypothesis: Lidocaine (5%) injection to the scar area before incision is effective in pain reduction among women who undergo a transabdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine abnormalities .


Description:

Preemptive analgesia is defined as “analgesic intervention provided before surgery to prevent or reduce subsequent pain”. By preventing central sensitization using nociceptive blockers by regional analgesia we may able to produce a painless postsurgical state. The use of preemptive analgesia was reported in various surgical procedures, such as in limb surgeries, laparoscopic procedures, mastectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Regarding abdominal hysterectomy there are only few reports, however both, malignancies and benign cases were included and conflicting results were obtained regarding the value of preemptive analgesia. Since hysterectomy is the most frequent major surgical procedure performed in gynecology, and it is estimated that by age 64 years, 40 % of women will have had a hysterectomy, it would be of great value to optimize pain treatment in these patients.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia in women who undergo a transabdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine abnormalities.

Material and Methods:

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board in accordance with the Helsinki declaration. Rambam Medical Center is a public hospital, with no private patients and women are treated according to the same standard of guidelines. Women with a benign uterine myoma with or without menometrorrhagia are considered for the study. Patients are excluded if they have a systemic vascular or neurological disease, diabetes or more than two previous abdominal surgeries. A written informed consent, is obtained from the patients prior to randomization into two treatment groups. In the first group 20 ml of 1 % lidocaine were injected subcutaneously in the incisional region 15 minutes prior to the start of operation. In the second group 20 ml of normal saline are injected subcutaneously in the incisional area 15 minutes prior to operation. The syringes containing Lidocaine or Saline solution are prepared and coded by the pharmacist of the hospital. The surgeons, anesthetists and the nursing staff are all blinded to the type of solution, which is injected. The code is disclosed only at the end of the study. The anesthetic technique is standardized. A transverse lower abdominal incision is used in all patients. After completion of operation all patients are treated in the postoperative care unit for two hours. The time of arrival in the postoperative care unit is defined as time zero. Analgesia with morphine and pethidine was provided only on patient request. Thereafter patients are transferred to the Gynecological department.

The standard care for postoperative pain in our department is as follows: three fixed doses of Ibuprofen 400 mg at three hour intervals with the first dose administrated at arrival to the department (2 hours after operation). Women are informed, that they can receive a rescue dose of another medication for breakthrough pain if further analgesia is needed before the three hours elapses. In such cases they receive an intramuscular injection of 10 mg morphine. After completion of the fixed interval analgesic regimen, patients are allowed to receive four more doses of oral analgesics upon their request at 3-hour intervals. Starting from the second postoperative day, only oral analgesia is provided, on patient request. Pain intensity is evaluated in the first 24 postoperative hours, before the administration of each dose of analgesic medication. The self-report of pain is assessed by measurement on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from “No Pain” (0), to “The most pain imaginable” (100). Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line that indicates the level of pain experienced. In addition, overall satisfaction with post surgical pain treatment was evaluated by patients 72 hours after surgery, with use of the same visual analogue scale but with phrasing of “very satisfactory” and “not satisfactory at all” The VAS results during the 24 hours and the number of doses of analgesia consumption during hospitalization will be compared between two groups using x test.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 32
Est. completion date September 2003
Est. primary completion date
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 35 Years to 58 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Women who are scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy because of myomatous uterus via lower transverse incision.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Oncological disease

- Systemic vascular disease

- Neurological disease

- Diabetes

- More than two previous abdominal surgeries.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double-Blind, Primary Purpose: Prevention


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Lidocaine (local anesthetics) 20 ml of 1 % subcutaneously


Locations

Country Name City State
Israel Dept. OBGYN, Rambam Medical Center Haifa
Israel Rambam Medical Center, Dept OBGYN Haifa

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Rambam Health Care Campus

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Israel, 

References & Publications (1)

Ali PB, Cotton BR, Williamson KM, Smith G. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine or lidocaine does not provide analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;80(2):245-7. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Postoperative pain scores: they were significantly lower in the study group in the first postoperative 8 hours
Secondary No significant differences between the groups were noted in analgesic consumption on the second post- operative day
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Terminated NCT04356352 - Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04748367 - Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care N/A
Completed NCT05057988 - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04466111 - Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
Recruiting NCT06206252 - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Completed NCT05868122 - A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06087432 - Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05508594 - Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03931772 - Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT02913027 - Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams? N/A
Terminated NCT02181387 - Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor? Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06032559 - Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03613155 - Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care