Clinical Trials Logo

Pain, Acute clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Pain, Acute.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06225908 Active, not recruiting - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

SPSIPB for Breast Cancer Surgery

Start date: January 1, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Acute postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery is usually moderate to severe, and inadequate postoperative pain management can significantly increase perioperative analgesic consumption, prolong hospital stay, and even cause long-term persistent pain such as postmastectomy pain syndrome. A multimodal analgesic approach (NSAII, paracetamol, opioids, local infiltration, facial plane blocks and paravertebral and periparavertebral blocks) is recommended. Paravertebral block (PVB) is considered the gold standard analgesic method for breast surgery. However, PVB is an invasive block requiring advanced skills and deep injection in close proximity to the pleura, intercostal nerves, neuraxis, great vessels and intercostal neurovascular bundles. As a result, the ongoing risks of pneumothorax, neuraxial spread, hypotension and systemic toxicity preclude its routine use in the day surgery setting. Therefore, alternative blocks have been developed. Various regional techniques such as Serratus plan block (SPB), interpectoral/pectoroserratus blocks (PECS I/II), erector spina plan block (ESPB) and rhomboid intercostal plan block (RIB) have been used to relieve pain after breast surgery. However, local anesthetic distribution may be affected by the surgical incision in the chest muscles. ESPB can be performed from cervical to sacral vertebrae, but clinical, cadaveric and radiologic results are inconsistent. RIB provides hemithoracic analgesia; however, RIB does not cover the cranial aspect of the T2 dermatome. A meta-analysis reported that SPB effectively relieves acute postoperative pain, reduces nausea and vomiting, and improves perioperative anesthesia outcomes in breast surgery. In another study compared with placebo, it was reported that serratus plane block provided less pain at rest, but there was no significant difference in reducing postoperative opioid consumption. Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plan Block is performed in the fascial plane between the serratus posterior superior muscle and intercostal muscles at the second and third costal level. SPSIB provides hemithoracic analgesia from the paraspinal region to the anteromedial region of the chest wall including the axillary region. In a case series of patients undergoing breast surgery, it was reported that the costal plane plays an important role in preventing pneumothorax, provides a natural barrier to the pleura, and may be a good choice for postoperative analgesia management as part of multimodal analgesia after breast surgery. In this study, the investigators aimed to observationally investigate the effect of serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery under general anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT06222047 Completed - Prematurity Clinical Trials

Pain and Comfort Level During Orogastric Catheter Insertion in Preterms

OGpreterm
Start date: March 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Purpose of the research: This research was planned to evaluate the effect of breast milk and dextrose application, which are pain relief methods, on the pain and comfort levels of preterm babies who will have an orogastric tube inserted in the 3rd and 4th levels of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Hypotheses: H0: The methods used during orogastric tube insertion do not affect the pain and comfort levels of preterm babies. H1: Preterm babies who are breastfed feel less pain during orogastric tube insertion. H2: Preterm babies given dextrose during orogastric tube insertion feel less pain. H3: The comfort level of preterm babies who are breastfed during orogastric tube insertion is higher. H4: The comfort level of preterm babies given dextrose during orogastric tube insertion is higher. H5: There is a difference between the pain and comfort levels of preterm patients in terms of group, time, and group-time, depending on the intervention applied.

NCT ID: NCT06215053 Recruiting - Opioid Use Clinical Trials

Pre-post Erector Spine Plane Block-spinal Surgery

pre-post-esp
Start date: January 1, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Spinal surgery patients generally have chronic pain in the preoperative period and are exposed to widespread and severe acute pain postoperatively. In spinal surgery patients, providing postoperative analgesia is important not only for the patient's comfort but also for preventing the negative effects of pain on the systems, allowing early mobilization, reducing hospital stay and especially reducing chronic pain syndrome. Although ESP block is routinely used in spinal analgesia, the answer to the question of whether investigators should perform the block after putting the patient to sleep or before waking the patient after completing the surgery is not clear. Preference varies among anesthesiologists.YOU investigators propose a randomized double-blind study comparing patients who underwent ESP block before surgery (Group 1) with patients who underwent ESP block after surgery (Group 2).

NCT ID: NCT06191770 Completed - Pain, Acute Clinical Trials

Comparison of Morphine With Nalbuphine in a Multimodal Approach for Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Procedures: Randomized Controlled Double Blind Clinical Trial

Start date: October 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study was conducted in the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. Pakistan is developing country and overall shortage of Morphine in developing country. Rationalizing, in multimodal analgesia, Nalbuphine is equivalent to morphine in open Abdominal hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT06187428 Active, not recruiting - Pain Clinical Trials

The PainSMART Research Program: Evaluating a Pain Education Strategy for Patients Seeking Primary Care Physiotherapy

PainSMART
Start date: January 22, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the PainSMART-strategy in a population of patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for pain related to muscles, joints and bones, so called musculoskeletal pain. The PainSMART-strategy consists of a digital educational film (entitled Be PainSMART:er) and a discussion based on the film at the initial physiotherapy consultation. The main questions this clinical trial aims to answer are: 1. Can the PainSMART-strategy update knowledge and beliefs about pain and aid early stage self-management of pain for participants seeking primary care physiotherapy with benign musculoskeletal pain? 2. Can the PainSMART-strategy improve evaluations of the initial physiotherapy consultation for both the patient and physiotherapist? Participating patients will be randomised into two groups. One group (intervention group) will receive the PainSMART-strategy as an adjunct to the current physiotherapy care pathway for musculoskeletal pain. The other group (control group) will follow the current physiotherapy care pathway. The two groups will be followed and compared over three months. Self-report questionnaires will be collected during the three-month period to analyse what effects the PainSMART-strategy can have on the following health outcomes: - Pain levels - Beliefs that one can remain active despite pain - Knowledge about pain - Worry about the seriousness of the pain - Expectations regarding recovery - Use of pain self-management strategies - Levels of physical activity - Absence from work due to pain - Number of referrals made for scans or x-rays, or to a specialist, for pain - Number of healthcare visits for pain during the trial period. Participating patients (both groups) and physiotherapists will also complete questionnaires to evaluate the effect of the PainSMART-strategy on the initial physiotherapy consultation.

NCT ID: NCT06131606 Completed - Pain, Acute Clinical Trials

Effect of Stress Ball in Angiography

Start date: January 10, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The target of this study was to determine the influence of stress ball application on pain and anxiety levels experienced by patients during angiography procedures.

NCT ID: NCT06131593 Completed - Pain, Acute Clinical Trials

TAP Block With Methyl-prednisolone as a Pain Treatment Modality After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy Procedures

Start date: December 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this work to compare between the efficacy of ultrasound guided TAP block with dexamethasone as an adjuvant versus ultrasound guided TAPB with methyl prednisolone as an adjuvant to local anesthetic for postoperative pain management in lower abdominal hysterectomy procedures.

NCT ID: NCT06130384 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Pain Reduction With Topical Bromfenac Versus Artificial Tear After Intravitreal Injection.

Start date: March 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this prospective interventional study is to compare post-intravitreal injection pain between eyes receiving topical bromfenac versus artificial tears as an analgesic after intravitreal injection.

NCT ID: NCT06125613 Completed - Pain, Acute Clinical Trials

Influence of Kinesiophobia on the Excitability of Connections Parieto-frontal During a Pointing Movement in Humans

pIPS/M1
Start date: December 10, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Objective(s) of the trial: Better understand the interaction between kinesiophobia and motor control. Main objective: To measure the influence of induced kinesiophobia on functional connectivity between the posterior parieto-occipital region and the primary motor cortex in healthy subjects during a pointing task. Secondary objectives: The secondary objectives will be 1) to verify the excitatory influence of pIPS stimulation on the excitability of M1 at rest and 2) to establish whether there is a correlation between functional connectivity and the level of kinesiophobia ( as measured by the Tampa Scale)

NCT ID: NCT06113926 Completed - Pain, Acute Clinical Trials

Racial Discrimination, Pain, and the Buffering Influences of Acknowledgment

Start date: September 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Black young adults (aged 18-30; N = 92) were racially included (i.e., received the ball an equal number of times) or excluded (i.e., received the ball only once) by other White players in a ball-tossing computer game called Cyberball; White experimenters acknowledged the exclusion for half of the excluded participants. Participants completed a cold-pressor task twice to measure pain sensitivity (threshold, tolerance, and unpleasantness): immediately prior, and after the Cyberball (and acknowledgment) manipulation. Participants also completed a post-manipulation survey examining the psychological effects of racial exclusion and acknowledgment (i.e., psychological needs satisfaction, negative affect, control).