View clinical trials related to Paclitaxel Adverse Reaction.
Filter by:The study aim is to determine the allele frequencies of 1236 G>A and 3435 G>A in ABCB1 and study their association with the incidence and severity of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy while adjusting for other baseline covariates in Egyptian patients. Additionally, the study aimed at fitting and validating logistic regression models with the aforementioned SNPs evaluated in additive, dominant, overdominant, and recessive genetic models and performing diagnostics for the best model in terms of internal validity.
The GermanVasc/MDEpiNet Paclitaxel Study, aims to use routinely collected data from health insurance claims and registries. The longitudinal data of Germany's second-largest insurance fund, BARMER, includes the outpatient and inpatient medical care provided to ≈9.4 million German citizens (13.2% of Germany's population) involving >21 million hospitalizations between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018. The BARMER cohort is similar to Western European countries and has been widely used for research projects. A regular random sample validation of internal and external validity is performed by the Medical Service of the Health Funds in Germany, and various peer-reviewed validation studies have been previously published. The GermanVasc clinical registry was implemented in 2018 as EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliant registry platform to process routinely collected clinical data from more than 35 high-volume vascular centers in Germany. In an ongoing project of a large multispecialty and multidisciplinary research consortium (RABATT study, Principal Investigator: PD Dr. Christian-Alexander Behrendt), active surveillance and medical device evaluation methods were developed. The current study aims to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents in peripheral arteries. It further aims to illuminate the underlying differences between the cohorts in randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-world data that can possibly explain the diametrically opposed results in an ongoing international controversy.
The SAFE-PAD Study aims to evaluate the long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices compared with non-paclitaxel-coated devices for femoropopliteal artery revascularization among a broad, real-world population of patients with peripheral artery disease. This multi-year analysis aims to create an ongoing mechanism to evaluate the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in real world practice. The null hypothesis is that the paclitaxel-coated devices are associated with an increase in mortality relative to the non-drug-coated devices beyond an acceptable magnitude (i.e. the non-inferiority margin), and the alternative hypothesis is that paclitaxel-coated devices are not associated with an increase in mortality relative to the non-drug-coated devices beyond the non-inferiority margin.