View clinical trials related to Pacing.
Filter by:The PROTECT-HF multi-centre randomised controlled trial will compare two different pacing approaches for treating patients with slow heart rates. In it the investigators will compare a long-standing standard approach for pacing; right ventricular pacing, with a new form of pacing, physiological pacing (His and Left bundle area pacing) in 2600 patients. Patients will be allocated at random to receive either right ventricular pacing or physiological pacing. Endpoint measurements will be undertaken at baseline, and at six-monthly intervals post-randomisation. Treatment allocation will be blinded to the endpoint assessor and the patient. Recruitment and pacemaker implantation will be carried out at each participating centre. The primary analysis will be intention to treat. The investigators will also perform an on-treatment analysis. 2048 patients are needed to detect the expected effect size with 85% power. A total of 2600 patients will be recruited to allow for patient drop-out and crossover. 500-patient sub-study will assess within patient, and between groups, echocardiographic changes over a 24-month period to try and improve mechanistic understanding of PICM (Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy).
Implantation with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) leads to improvements in survival and quality of life, however, work capacity remains disappointingly low, at half of the expected value. Complex central and peripheral hallmarks of heart failure attribute to the continued work intolerance, to which heart rate may be a contributing factor. The purpose of this study is to clarify the impact of heart rate (by means of pacing) on work capacity (measured as peak oxygen uptake) in LVAD recipients.
The purpose of this study is to explore if there is a less harmful way to pace patients with first-degree AV-block to ensure that the negative effects inferred by the pacing do not outweigh the positive effects of AV-synchrony. The main hypothesis of the study is that His-bundle pacing will offer a more physiological mode of pacing in patients with first-degree AV-block than conventional pacing. Patients scheduled for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in sinus rhythm, with first degree AV-block, normal QRS duration less than 120 ms and normal left ventricular ejection fraction will be included. During the AF ablation three different pacing modes (atrial, AV-synchronous and His-bundle pacing) at two different rates (5 to10 bpm above the basal rate and at 100 bpm) will be performed and evaluated using echocardiography. After the completion of all six pacing protocols (i.e., three modes at two different rates) the experimental part of the procedure ends. The primary end-point will be echocardiographic evidence of dyssynchrony. Secondary end-points will include left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volume, mitral regurgitation, septal to posterior wall motion delay and inter-ventricular wall motion delay. Since the research study is conducted in parallel with the standard catheter ablation, we do not anticipate any additional side effects as a result of the study.
Safety and effectiveness will be summarized for the model 4965 lead. This study was conducted within Medtronic's System Longevity Study (SLS).