Clinical Trials Logo

Ovarian Stimulation clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Ovarian Stimulation.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06175832 Not yet recruiting - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

PPOS (Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation) and Corifollitropin Alfa (CFA) Cross-over Study

Start date: April 1, 2024
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

P-CCROSS is a randomized, prospective monocentric phase 4 study with a crossover study design. The aim of the study is to compare patient satisfaction (by means of questionnaires) and treatment compliance with IVF treatment with CFA (corifollitropin alfa) and PPOS (Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation) versus conventional IVF treatment with a recombinant FSH/GnRH antagonist. The study will also compare patients undergoing elective fertility preservation versus PGT-A (pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy) patients.The study will have a crossover design so that patients will receive both forms of treatment. The investigators will also compare the endocrine profile and ovarian response of CFA/PPOS versus rFSH/GnRH ovarian stimulation cycles.

NCT ID: NCT06142708 Recruiting - Ovarian Stimulation Clinical Trials

The Effect of Dual Trigger (GnRH Agonist + hCG) for Final Maturation in Oocyte Donors With History of a Previous Cycle With Suboptimal Response to GnRH Agonist Only Trigger

Start date: November 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare GnRH-agonist trigger with dual GnRH-agonist and HCG trigger in oocyte donors. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Maturation rate (Metaphase II/ Total number of COCs collected) - Fertilization rate - Embryo quality day 3 - Fragmentation rate embryo day 3 - Blastulation rate (Day5/6/7) - Quality of blastocyst (Gardner criteria) Participants will undergo controlled ovarian stimulation with a GnRH antagonist protocol Researchers will compare the effects of final maturation with GnRH-agonist trigger to a dual trigger (hCG and GnRH-a)

NCT ID: NCT05166668 Recruiting - Ovarian Stimulation Clinical Trials

Letrozole /GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Over 40 Years Undergoing ICSI Cycle

Start date: November 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study To compare the clinical and laboratory outcomes of two ovarian stimulation protocols (standard GnRH antagonist protocol and aromatase inhibitor/ antagonist protocol) in women (40-44) years undergoing ICSI cycle.

NCT ID: NCT04549649 Completed - Ovarian Stimulation Clinical Trials

The Effect of Dual Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation on IVF/ICSI Outcomes in Patients With Suboptimal Ovarian Response

Start date: November 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Recently, in patients with a suboptimal ovarian response, a study of the role of adding a single dose of GnRH agonist to a standard dose of hCG to initiate final oocyte maturation has also been studied. Griffin et al. (2014) reported that in patients who had more than 25% immature oocytes in their previous IVF cycle, the use of dual stimulation could increase the number of mature oocytes. Since studies in this field are limited, the researchers decided to design a clinical trial to investigate the effect of adding a GnRH agonist to a standard dose of hCG to initiate final oocyte maturation in patients with a sub-optimal ovarian response.

NCT ID: NCT04539067 Not yet recruiting - Ovarian Stimulation Clinical Trials

Effect of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Quality of Oocyte and Embryo

Start date: September 1, 2020
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Investigate and compare the efficacy of H FSH plus HMG Vs HMG alone on oocyte and embryo quality in IcsI patients

NCT ID: NCT03939403 Completed - Ovarian Stimulation Clinical Trials

Conventional Ovarian Stimulation vs. Single Injection Stimulation of Corifollitropin Alfa in Oocyte Donor

TAIL
Start date: November 18, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to study the efficiency of using a single injection of Corifollitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation by initiating administration late and without further administration of follicle-stimulating hormone after the 7th day of stimulation compared to conventional ovarian stimulation using Corifollitropin alfa (drug administration 5 days after cessation of hormonal contraceptive and supplementation with follicle-stimulating hormone daily administration from the 8th day of stimulation). This a controlled randomized clinical study and 180 patients will be recruited (90 per arm) and the primary study outcome is the number of obtained oocytes.

NCT ID: NCT03400722 Recruiting - Infertility, Female Clinical Trials

Double Ovarian Stimulation as Accumulation Strategy for Older Infertile Patients With Suboptimal Ovarian Response

Start date: December 1, 2017
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Patients with infertility of the older age group of 37-42 years - a large cohort of patients of reproductive medicine. Two possible causes reduce their probability of pregnancy - an increasing age and a decrease of the ovarian reserve. In these conditions, the early receipt of embryos for future transfer can serve as a correct strategy for treating infertility in this category of patients. According to statistical data, patients of the 37-42-year-old age group need 3-5 blastocysts, out of them 1-2 euploid to achieve pregnancy. The POSEIDON group of researchers identified a group of 2b patients with a suboptimal response to the induction of superovulation in IVF programs - patients older than 35 years with a normal ovarian reserve (the number of antral follicles greater than 5 and Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) greater than 1.2 ng / ml), resulting in 4-9 oocytes after a standard ovarian stimulation. In this situation standard stimulation protocols can stretch the process of obtaining embryos indefinitely, during which the patient will move to another age category with a decrease in the likelihood of pregnancy. Thus, these patients are shown the fastest reception of oocytes and the accumulation of embryos, which can be done using double ovarian stimulation in the same menstrual cycle. The aim of the study is to compare the different schemes of double stimulation in patients with infertility of the older age group of 37-42 years with the preceding suboptimal response. Group 1 - patients of the DUOSTIM group. Group 2 - Patients of the Shanghai Protocol. The investigated parameters - primary outcome measures: total number of retrieved oocytes per cycle, secondary outcome measures: total number of blastocyst per cycle, number of cycles with double ovarian stimulation required to obtain 3-5 blastocyst, time until embryo transfer, pregnancy rate and birth rate This is a prospective randomized non-blinded clinical study.

NCT ID: NCT03298750 Not yet recruiting - Ovarian Stimulation Clinical Trials

Mechanical Stimulation of the Ovary for Infertility Treatment in Patients With Very Low Ovarian Reserve

Start date: October 20, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Examine the possibility that mechanical stimulation and ovarian fragmentation in women with premature ovarian failure or low ovarian reserve intended for egg donation may cause early follicular recruitment and increase chances of achieving pregnancy through IVF.

NCT ID: NCT02715336 Recruiting - Pregnancy Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Medication Used to Stimulate Ovulation

Start date: October 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Individuals undergoing In Vitro Fertilization must undergo controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) to produce enough quality eggs for fertility treatment. Ovarian follicular responsiveness to COH with gonadotropins is extremely variable between patients and even from cycle to cycle for the same patient. Achieving an ideal follicular response is critical to the success of assisted reproduction treatment (ART). Patients have been classified as 'poor', 'normal' or 'high' responders, which dictate the amount of gonadotropins that they receive. It is still important to develop treatments with high efficacy, lower multiple birth rates, and a lower complication rate for each of these groups. In an era of evidence-based medicine and with special emphasis on reducing IVF risks (mainly OHSS and pregnancies with multiples), it is very important to find optimal and safe ovulation induction and triggering regimens for each patient population. The use of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) triggering among high responders in order to reduce or eliminate OHSS is an example of an important breakthrough in the clinical management of IVF patients. Although GnRHa triggering was shown to be as effective as human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at inducing oocyte maturation more than 20 years ago, its use to trigger ovulation was not possible until the introduction of GnRH antagonists for pituitary suppression. Another prominent trend in ART in recent years has been the introduction of dual triggering, which involves a combination of GnRHa plus hCG for triggering. This regimen creates simultaneous lutenizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) surges by the GnRHa, which resembles physiologic ovulation triggering, together with sustained LH-like activity from the hCG, which stimulates the corpus luteum to excrete sufficient hormonal endometrial support. Since its introduction, dual triggering has been gaining popularity due to outstanding results in retrospective studies among both normal and high responders. Moreover, in spite of the encouraging retrospective reports, prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) on dual triggering have not been reported to date. The aim of the current proposed study is to compare the efficacy of dual triggering and conventional triggering among the three IVF populations (high, normal and poor responders).

NCT ID: NCT01816789 Terminated - Clinical trials for In Vitro Fertilization

Age Versus Ovarian Reserve Markers Based Therapy in IVF (IVF)/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Cycles

Start date: March 2013
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This randomized controlled trial has been designed for carrying out a comparison of new AMH (Anti-Müllerian Hormone)-based individualized treatment (using a nomogram) with the wide accepted age-based strategy. The main objective of the trial is to assess whether an individualized FSH starting dose can increase the rate of women with an adequate ovarian response in terms of retrieved oocytes (optimal number of retrieved oocytes: 8-14).