View clinical trials related to Ovarian Neoplasms.
Filter by:This phase I trial studies the side effects and how well surgery and heated chemotherapy with or without non-heated chemotherapy after surgery works in treating patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, uterine, or peritoneal cancer. Giving a dose of heated chemotherapy into the abdomen during surgery that is done to remove ovarian, fallopian tube, uterine, or peritoneal cancer may help lower the risk of the cancer coming back. Giving unheated chemotherapy drugs directly into the abdomen after surgery may kill more tumor cells.
This multicenter prospective study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Avastin (bevacizumab) in routine clinical practice in patients with advanced/metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer. Data will be collected from eligible patients until death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or study closure.
The goal of this clinical research study is to compare ovarian cancer screening, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (PSDO). The safety of RRSO and PSDO will also be studied. Ovarian cancer screening does not involve a surgical procedure. Instead, physical exams, blood tests, and ultrasound are used to check for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. The surgical procedures, RRSO and PSDO, are designed to lower your risk of ovarian cancer. In RRSO, the fallopian tubes and ovaries are removed at the same time. In PSDO, the fallopian tubes are removed and the ovaries remain in place so that the patient does not go through menopause. The ovaries are removed at a later date. The main goal of this study is to learn how many patients actually have their ovaries removed at a later date. Researchers also want to learn whether the removal of fallopian tubes will decrease the risk of ovarian cancer.
This is a phase I clinical study for patients with platinum-resistant high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, and the response to a combination of cyclophosphamide, autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), autologous dendritic cells (DCs), and OKT3 (anti-CD3 antibody), along with low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy.
A Phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study to assess the efficacy of olaparib maintenance monotherapy in relapsed high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients (including patients with primary peritoneal and / or fallopian tube cancer) or high grade endometrioid cancer with BRCA mutations (documented mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 that is predicted to be deleterious or suspected deleterious (known or predicted to be detrimental/lead to loss of function)) who have responded following platinum based chemotherapy.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and security of lobaplatin combined with docetaxel in treatment of the sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.
Olaparib Monotherapy in Patients with BRCA Mutated Ovarian Cancer following First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy.
Bevacizumab has been found to prolong progression free survival in first line, and more recently, in second line treatment for platinum sensitive ovarian cancer patients who had not received prior treatment with bevacizumab. Recently reported data suggest that patients with colon cancer who receive bevacizumab in more than one line of therapy (beyond progression) have better results. In ovarian cancer, the role of bevacizumab administered in both first and second-line therapies needs to be defined. This study aims to evaluate whether administering bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in second-line therapy to patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who have received first-line bevacizumab will be more effective than chemotherapy alone.
An adnexal mass is the most common indication for gynaecological surgery . Pre operative characterization is crucial and a scoring system would be useful to standardize the imaging report and thus, improve patient management. Recently, our center developed the first MR scoring system named ADNEXMR SCORING system in a retrospective study which is accurate and reproducible (1). Our objectives are to perform an external prospective validation of this scoring system, to evaluate its potential impact on therapeutic strategy and to test its reproducibility. This is a prospective large multicenter study. All patients with a sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center. Then, patients will undergo a routine pelvic MR imaging. Prospectively, one senior and one junior radiologists independently analyze the different MR criteria to characterize adnexal masses. The MR report will be issued as standard and the patient will be managed accordingly. Then, the reader will classify the mass using ADNEXMR SCORING system. The classification will be compared to the reference standard as defined below. The reproducibility of the classification will be tested between the junior and the senior radiologist. After anonymisation, images will be analyzed by another senior radiologist of another center blinded from any clinical or ultrasonographical data and correlated with the reference standard. Reference standard: Reference standard will be surgical procedure with histology or standard clinical follow-up depending on most appropriate routine practice. Sample size: The sample size was computed to ensure a power of at least 90% (with a two-sided type I error rate of 5%) to conclude that SCORE 2 and 3 and SCORE 4 and 5 would have a different PPV. It would thus be necessary to have at least 569 patients classified as SCORE 2, 259 as SCORE 3, 52 as SCORE 4 and 51 as SCORE 5 (18). Given the prevalences, and assuming 6% of patients would be classified, as SCORE 1 and 10% would be lost to follow-up, 1340 patients will be included in this study to insure a probability of at least 95% to obtain the aforementioned number of patients in each score category. The inclusion period will last 18 months (extension for a period of 12 months) and monitoring will continue for 2 years. Thomassin Naggara I., et al. Development and preliminary validation of an MRI Scoring system for Adnexal Masses. Radiology 2013, May;267(2):432-43.
The purpose of this study is to find the answers to the following research question(s): 1. Is the study drug equivalent to the approved drug, Doxil/Caelyx, and does it act the same way in the body as the approved drug? ATI-0918 is believed to be a generic of Doxil/Caelyx and this is what the study is trying to prove. All people who participate in this study will receive the research study medication (ATI-0918) and Doxil/Caelyx in addition to best supportive care (treatment for symptoms). The study drug being tested in this study works the same as the FDA (government) approved drug doxorubicin HCl. ATI-0918 is a generic (the same) formulation of doxorubicin HCl being delivered (given to the patient).