Comparison Between Combined ALLR With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Clinical Trial

— ALLR  

Official title:

Clinical Comparison and Motion Analysis of Sports Function Between Combined Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06341192
• Other study ID #: ChangGungMH ALL SB DB
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 1, 2024
• Est. completion date: October 31, 2026

Study information

• Verified date: March 2024
• Source: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
• Contact: Cheng-Pang Dr. Yang
• Phone: 886-3-3281200 ext. 2163
• Email: ronnie80097[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test and compare different surgical techniques in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What are the optimal criteria for selecting between single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction? - How do these two surgical techniques compare in terms of post-operative knee stability, functional outcomes, and reducing re-tear rates? Participants will: - Undergo pre-operative MRI imaging, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis evaluations - Be randomly assigned to either: - Single-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction - Double-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction - Receive the assigned surgical procedure - Participate in post-operative follow-ups, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis at 6 months and 1 year Researchers will compare the single-bundle ACL + ALL group and the double-bundle ACL + ALL group to see if one technique demonstrates superior knee stability, functional outcomes (e.g. return to sport ability), and lower ACL re-tear rates.

Description:

Anterolateral ligament(ALL) combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACL) has become more and more popular in recent years, as ALL could protect the ACL graft in tibial internal rotation, and prevent the ACL graft from rupture. Cottet et al. proposed a minimal invasive method with Y-figure construct of ALL, without acquiring additional graft from the patient. Their data showed significant lower graft re-rupture rate and faster return-to-sport(RTS). There are many different techniques of ACL combined ALL reconstruction. While these methods mostly are single bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction. Previous cadaver studies told that the anterior cruciate ligament is composed of anteromedial and posterolateral bundle. It had been debated between single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction for years. As a result, it is meaningful to compare the clinical outcomes between ALL combined with single bundle or double bundle ACL reconstruction. Our studies included MRI image, arthrometer measurement and optical motion capture system. We hope to compare the clinical outcomes and sports function between A: single bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction and B: double bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: October 31, 2026
• Est. primary completion date: August 31, 2026
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients plan to receive ACL surgery
• at least 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

• Presented history of the injured leg or congenital abnormality

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
• Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Intervention

Procedure:
• Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
Single-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: Patients in this group will undergo reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a single-bundle graft technique. In addition, they will have the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructed using a portion of the same graft material. The single ACL bundle is typically positioned to replicate the anatomic footprint of the native ACL. For the ALL reconstruction, a commonly used technique is the Sonnery-Cottet ALL reconstruction using a gracilis tendon graft. This combines an intra-articular ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis to improve rotational instability.
• Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
Double-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: Patients in this group will undergo anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using two graft bundles to more anatomically replicate the native ACL's anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. Like the single-bundle group, they will also have supplemental ALL reconstruction performed using a portion of the graft material. The double-bundle ACL reconstruction aims to better restore the ACL's complex anatomic footprint and bundles' tension patterns.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Taiwan	Chang Gung memorial hospital	Taoyuan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

References & Publications (5)

Batty LM, Firth A, Moatshe G, Bryant DM, Heard M, McCormack RG, Rezansoff A, Peterson DC, Bardana D, MacDonald PB, Verdonk PCM, Spalding T, Getgood AMJ; STABILITY Study Group; Willits K, Birmingham T, Hewison C, Wanlin S, Firth A, Pinto R, Martindale A, O'Neill L, Jennings M, Daniluk M, Boyer D, Zomar M, Moon K, Pritchett R, Payne K, Fan B, Mohan B, Buchko GM, Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Tynedal J, Stranges G, Mcrae S, Gullett L, Brown H, Legary A, Longo A, Christian M, Ferguson C, Mohtadi N, Barber R, Chan D, Campbell C, Garven A, Pulsifer K, Mayer M, Simunovic N, Duong A, Robinson D, Levy D, Skelly M, Shanmugaraj A, Howells F, Tough M, Thompson P, Metcalfe A, Asplin L, Dube A, Clarkson L, Brown J, Bolsover A, Bradshaw C, Belgrove L, Millan F, Turner S, Verdugo S, Lowe J, Dunne D, McGowan K, Suddens CM, Declercq G, Vuylsteke K, Van Haver M. Association of Ligamentous Laxity, Male Sex, Chronicity, Meniscal Injury, and Posterior Tibial Slope With a High-Grade Preoperative Pivot Shift: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STABILITY Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 6;9(4):23259671211000038. doi: 10.1177/23259671211000038. eCollection 2021 Apr. — View Citation

Cameron KL, Peck KY, Davi SM, Owens CRBD, Svoboda CRSJ, DiStefano LJ, Marshall SW, de la Motte SJ, Beutler CRAI, Padua DA. Association Between Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Items and the Incidence Rate of Lower Extremity Stress Fracture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 9;10(6):23259671221100790. doi: 10.1177/23259671221100790. eCollection 2022 Jun. — View Citation

Helito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, Demange MK, Bordalo-Rodrigues M. Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Injuries of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 17. — View Citation

Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Fayard JM, Ferretti A, Helito CP, Lind M, Monaco E, de Padua VBC, Thaunat M, Wilson A, Zaffagnini S, Zijl J, Claes S. Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament - deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Jun;18(2):91-106. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0449-8. — View Citation

Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571. Epub 2015 Mar 4. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)	International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. The IKDC is a patient-completed tool, which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).	Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Primary	Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)	Marx's activity score;The Marx Scale consists of four questions concerning four activities or actions: running, cutting, deceleration, and pivoting. The patient or survey respondent is asked to report on the frequency with which they performed the activity in their healthiest state within the past year. From 0 point(the worst) to 16 points(the best).	Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Primary	Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)	SANE score, The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a patient rating from 0-100. Patients rate their current illness score in relation to their pre-injury baseline	Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Primary	Knee ligament stability:	Anterior tibial translation measured using a ligament arthrometer (GNRB) to objectively quantify anteroposterior knee laxity	Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Primary	Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation	Lachman test	Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Primary	Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation	pivot shift test	Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Primary	Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation	Anterior drawer test	Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Primary	Functional performance and return to sport	Lower limb muscle strength	Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Primary	Functional performance and return to sport	Lower limb symmetry index	Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Primary	Imaging	Pre- and post-operative X-ray analysis to assess bone tunnels position	Preoperative, 1 year
Primary	Imaging	Pre- and post-operative MRI analysis to assess graft ligamentization.	Preoperative, 1 year