Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06216184 |
Other study ID # |
CHUC_2022_17 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
September 30, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
University Hospital of Canary Islands |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The investigators wanted to determine whether the combined use of vortexing and Maki
techniques provides profitability versus the Maki technique for the diagnosis of catheter tip
colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection
Description:
BACKGROUND A previous study compared vortexing and Maki techniques for the diagnosis of
catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and concluded that vortexing was not superior
to Maki method.
AIM To determine whether the combined use of vortexing and Maki techniques provides
profitability versus the Maki technique for the diagnosis of catheter tip colonization (CTC)
and CRBSI.
METHODS Observational and prospective study carried out in an Intensive Care Unit. Patients
with suspected catheter-related infection (CRI) and with one central venous catheter for at
least 7 days were included. The area under the curve (AUC) of the Maki technique, the
vortexing technique and the combination of both techniques for the diagnosis of CTC and CRBSI
were compared.