Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy utilizes an air oxygen blend allowing from 21 % to 1 00% FiO2 delivery and generates up to 60 L/min flow rates The gas is heated and humidified through an active heated humidifier and delivered via a single limb heated inspiratory circuit (to avoid heat loss and condensation) to the patient through a large diameter nasal cannula Theoretically, HFNC offers significant advantages in oxygenation and ventilation over COT. Constant high flow oxygen delivery provides steady FiO2 and decreases oxygen dilution. It also washes out physiologic dead space and generates positive end expiration pressure (PEEP) that augments ventilation The heated humidification facilitates secretion clearance, decreases bronchospasm, and maintains mucosal integrity. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HFNC compared to NIMV in management of Acute hypoxemic and acute hypercapneic respiratory failure


Clinical Trial Description

- Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and serious complication among hospitalized patients. It is the most frequent reason for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) . It carries an in-hospital mortality rate of 20.6% and cost 54.3 billion dollars nationwide in United States in 2009. Among those patients with ARF, 42.1 % of patients require mechanical ventilation (MV), which is associated with a significant increase in both length of stay and medical expense - ARF can be categorized into acute hypoxemic respiratory failure(AHRF) and acute hypercapneic respiratory failure. - Supplemental oxygen and treatment of the underlying cause is the mainstay of therapy for AHRF. Options for oxygen therapy include conventional oxygen therapy delivered via nasal cannulae (NC) or face masks (FM) initially, followed by non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and finally intubation or mechanical ventilation (MV) . - Traditional NC and FM (collectively referred to as conventional oxygen therapy or COT) can achieve flow rates of up to 1 5 L/min. However, these flow rates may be significantly lower than patients' spontaneous inspiratory flow rates and the oxygen is diluted as it is mixed with room air Consequently, the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) delivered Is variable and this is thought to explain why many patients require an escalation of oxygen therapy to NIV or MV. - By contrast, humidified high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy utilizes an air oxygen blend allowing from 21 % to 1 00% FiO2 delivery and generates up to 60 L/min flow rates The gas is heated and humidified through an active heated humidifier and delivered via a single limb heated inspiratory circuit (to avoid heat loss and condensation) to the patient through a large diameter nasal cannula Theoretically, HFNC offers significant advantages in oxygenation and ventilation over COT. Constant high flow oxygen delivery provides steady FiO2 and decreases oxygen dilution. It also washes out physiologic dead space and generates positive end expiration pressure (PEEP) that augments ventilation The heated humidification facilitates secretion clearance, decreases bronchospasm, and maintains mucosal integrity - HFNC has been well studied in the neonatal and pediatric settings However, in adults, the use of HFNC has Primarily been studied in post-cardiac surgery post-extubation and bronchoscopy patients. However, the utility of HFNC use in adults with AHRF in emergency and general inpatient practice is less clear .Heated and humidified high-flow oxygen through nasal cannula (HFNC) has been developed over the past 2 decades, as an alternative to standard oxygen delivery systems - . In adults, it has been used to treat hypoxemic respiratory failure, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, postoperatively and postextubation in do-not-intubate patients or during bronchoscopy - To date, the literature supports the possibility to use HFNC as alternative to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in some settings, while in others might be even superior . It is also an alternative to standard oxygen as first line therapy in management of patients with acute respiratory failure . NIV is strongly recommended in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure associated with acute respiratory acidosis, the vast majority of whom meet the criteria for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation - Recently, Studies revealed no difference of the 30-day mortality and intubation rate between NIV and HFNC, in severe acute exacerbation of COPD with moderate, hypercapnic, acute respiratory failure. In a retrospective study, that suggeste that HFNC oxygen therapy was beneficial, even in respiratory failure Type 2, resulting in significant improvement of both oxygenation and hypercapnia. another study also indicated that HFNO leads to a flow-dependent reduction in PaCO2 in patients with stable hypercapnic COPD, due to a washout of the respiratory tract and a functional reduction in dead space - Although cumulative evidence supports that HFNC is effective in patients with hypercapnia, randomized studies to compare HFNC vs. NIV in patients with acute, hypercapnic respiratory failure are missing. so the investigator conducting this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, involving patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), to compare the efficacy of HFNC versus NIV in the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05499039
Study type Interventional
Source Assiut University
Contact Abdelrahman Mo Alham, Demonstrator
Phone 01014546379
Email abdoverno@gmail.com
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date October 10, 2022
Completion date October 20, 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT06007495 - Pilot Physiological Evaluation of an Investigational Mask With Expiratory Washout. N/A
Completed NCT05060926 - Intubation Prediction in COVID-19 Patients Treated With Awake Prone Positioning
Recruiting NCT05203536 - Respiratory Mechanics Assessment During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation
Completed NCT04570384 - Intravenous L-Citrulline Influence on the Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Patients With COVID-19 Phase 2
Completed NCT04568642 - Comparing Closed-loop FiO2 Controller With Conventional Control of FiO2 N/A
Completed NCT03653806 - Automated Analysis of EIT Data for PEEP Setting
Completed NCT01747109 - Benefits of Optiflow® Device for Preoxygenation Before Intubation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure : The PREOXYFLOW Study N/A
Terminated NCT04632043 - Early Versus Delayed Intubation of Patients With COVID-19 N/A
Completed NCT04581811 - Prolonged Prone Positioning for COVID-19-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06064409 - Optimal Timing and Failure Prediction of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Emergency Department: Prospective Observational Single Center Study
Completed NCT03133520 - Effectiveness of High Flow Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure N/A
Recruiting NCT04997265 - Strategies for Anticoagulation During Venovenous ECMO N/A
Completed NCT05083130 - Awake Prone Positioning in Moderate to Severe COVID-19 N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06374589 - Closed-Loop O2 Use During High Flow Oxygen Treatment Of Critical Care Adult Patients (CLOUDHFOT) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06333002 - Machine Learning Model to Predict Outcome and Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Recruiting NCT05078034 - HNFO With or Without Helmet NIV for Oxygenation Support in Acute Respiratory Failure Pilot RCT N/A
Recruiting NCT03513809 - Inflammation and Distribution of Pulmonary Ventilation Before and After Tracheal Intubation in ARDS Patients
Terminated NCT04395807 - Helmet CPAP Versus HFNC in COVID-19 N/A
Completed NCT00578734 - Lucinactant for Treatment of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Children up to Two Years Old Phase 2
Recruiting NCT00342368 - Helmet CPAP vs Venturi O2 to Treat Early ALI/ARDS N/A