Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05457452
Other study ID # INDO321
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 1, 2022
Est. completion date March 1, 2023

Study information

Verified date July 2022
Source Indonesia University
Contact Danarto H Adhimukti
Phone 81382869313
Email danartohari123@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is a study looking for the relationship between variables with a prospective cohort design to determine functional outcomes subjectively and objectively in patients with and without braces after ACL reconstruction with bone quadriceps tendon per arthroscopy.


Description:

This study is a study looking for the relationship between variables with a prospective cohort design to determine functional outcomes subjectively and objectively in patients with and without braces after ACL reconstruction with bone quadriceps tendon per arthroscopy. The research will be conducted at the National Central General Hospital dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta Police Hospital and Gatot Soebroto Army Hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 32
Est. completion date March 1, 2023
Est. primary completion date February 1, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patients with age more than equal to 18 years - Patients with ACL rupture without other ligament ruptures undergoing ACL reconstruction - Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using Quadricep Tendon Autograft Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with hyperlaxity - Patients with previous history of ACL reconstruction - Patients with recurrent rupture during the observation period

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Knee Brace
Installation of an angle-adjustable knee brace, used after ACL reconstruction performed by an orthopedic specialist or orthopedic PPDS with the first week the angle locked at 00, in the second week the angle 0-900, in the third week the angle 0-1200, and the fourth week the angle of flexion full. Braces are used except for physical therapy according to the rehabilitation protocol in the first week.

Locations

Country Name City State
Indonesia Department of Orthpaedic and Traumatology RSCM-FKUI Jakarta Pusat Jakarta

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Indonesia University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Indonesia, 

References & Publications (10)

Chan CX, Wong KL, Toh SJ, Krishna L. Epidemiology of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries undergoing reconstruction surgery in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Res Sports Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;29(1):12-24. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2018.1492391. Epub 2018 Jul 9. — View Citation

Dzakiya FNA, Tinduh D, Utomo DN. Risk Estimation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury in East Java Puslatda Pencak Silat Athletes. Surabaya Phys Med Rehabil J. 2021;3:29.

Fleming BC, Renstrom PA, Beynnon BD, Engstrom B, Peura G. The influence of functional knee bracing on the anterior cruciate ligament strain biomechanics in weightbearing and nonweightbearing knees. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;28(6):815-24. — View Citation

Kaeding CC, Léger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA. Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jan;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Oct 4. Review. — View Citation

Lowe WR, Warth RJ, Davis EP, Bailey L. Functional Bracing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Mar;25(3):239-249. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00710. Review. — View Citation

Lubis AM, Dasril DF. Comparison of functional outcome between bone quadriceps tendon (BQT) and single-bundle hamstring tendon (SBHT) autograft in arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction cases: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov 13;60:509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.023. eCollection 2020 Dec. — View Citation

Melegati G, Tornese D, Bandi M, Volpi P, Schonhuber H, Denti M. The role of the rehabilitation brace in restoring knee extension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003 Sep;11(5):322-6. Epub 2003 Jul 16. — View Citation

Montalvo AM, Schneider DK, Webster KE, Yut L, Galloway MT, Heidt RS Jr, Kaeding CC, Kremcheck TE, Magnussen RA, Parikh SN, Stanfield DT, Wall EJ, Myer GD. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Injury Incidence by Sex and Sport Classification. J Athl Train. 2019 May;54(5):472-482. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-407-16. Epub 2019 Apr 22. — View Citation

Perrone GS, Webster KE, Imbriaco C, Portilla GM, Vairagade A, Murray MM, Kiapour AM. Risk of Secondary ACL Injury in Adolescents Prescribed Functional Bracing After ACL Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Nov 12;7(11):2325967119879880. doi: 10.1177/2325967119879880. eCollection 2019 Nov. — View Citation

Rudy, Mustamsir E, Phatama KY. Tensile strength comparison between peroneus longus and hamstring tendons: A biomechanical study. Int J Surg Open [Internet]. 2017;9:41-4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2017.10.002

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score 3 months post treatment Patients were interviewed by the examiner based on questions in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher score means better clinical outcomes 3 months
Primary International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score 6 months post treatment Patients were interviewed by the examiner based on questions in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher score means better clinical outcomes 6 months
Primary Lysholm score 3 months post treatment Patients were interviewed by the examiner based on the questions in the Lysholm form. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher score means better clinical outcomes 3 months
Primary Lysholm score 6 months post treatment Patients were interviewed by the examiner based on the questions in the Lysholm form. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher score means better clinical outcomes 6 months
Primary Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) score 3 months post treatment The patient was interviewed by the examiner according to the KOOS Questionnaire form. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher score means better clinical outcomes 3 months
Primary Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) score 6 months post treatment The patient was interviewed by the examiner according to the KOOS Questionnaire form. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher score means better clinical outcomes 6 months
Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score 3 months post treatment Patients were interviewed by the examiner based on the questions on the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) form. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher score means better clinical outcomes 3 months
Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score 6 months post treatment Patients were interviewed by the examiner based on the questions on the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) form. Scale from 0 to 100. Higher score means better clinical outcomes 6 months
Primary Rolimeter 3 months post treatment Objective examination of knee stability using a rolymeter 3 months
Primary Rolimeter 6 months post treatment Objective examination of knee stability using a rolymeter 6 month
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04062578 - Effects Provided by a Physiotherapy Treatment Preventing Lower Extremity Injuries in Female Football Players N/A
Recruiting NCT05461326 - Quadriceps Tendon Versus Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Autograft ACL Reconstruction RCT N/A
Completed NCT05109871 - Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque N/A
Completed NCT05504018 - Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of ACL Reconstruction Results N/A
Recruiting NCT06185231 - Investigation of the Effects of Vibration Therapy on Pain, Functionality, and Proprioception After ACL Injury N/A
Recruiting NCT03968913 - Biologic Therapy to Prevent Osteoarthritis After ACL Injury Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04408690 - Feasibility of a RCT That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair After ACL Injury Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06222814 - Evaluation of the Results of Two Different Methods in Management of Antero-lateral Instability of the Knee N/A
Recruiting NCT05614297 - Agreement Between Rolimeter and Lachmeter in Patients With ACL Injury
Active, not recruiting NCT05184023 - The Effect of PEMF for Patients With Quadriceps Muscle Weakness After ACLR N/A
Completed NCT04906538 - Objective Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Internal Suture Augmentation Technique Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05014009 - The Influence of Neuromuscular Training on Whole-body Movement Strategies and Knee Mechanics During Change-of-direction Tasks in Sports Science Students N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06083818 - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Protocol in Female Football Players With Dynamic Knee Valgus N/A
Recruiting NCT05584020 - Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury N/A
Completed NCT04580290 - Jewel ACL Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Recruiting NCT04888052 - Prolonged Preoperative Rehabilitation in ACL Rupture. N/A
Recruiting NCT06430775 - Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
Not yet recruiting NCT05580133 - All-Inside Single-Bundle for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Full Thickness of the Peroneus Longus Tendon Compared to the Six-strand-hamstring Autograft (ACL)
Recruiting NCT04162613 - Can Sensorimotor Function Predict Graft Rupture After ACL Reconstruction
Not yet recruiting NCT05619393 - Comparison of Kinematic Movements Between ACL Deficiency With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy People N/A