Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Clinical Trial
Official title:
Absorbable Interface Screw Clinical Trial - PUTH & NANTON
Verified date | May 2022 |
Source | Peking University Third Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Validation of the safety and efficacy of absorbable interface screws for clinical use
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 86 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | May 30, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - ? Before surgery, subjects or guardians are willing and able to sign the informed consent; - Patients aged 18 to 80 (including 18 and 80 years old), regardless of gender; - Patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for anterior cruciate ligament rupture of the knee joint and have no contraindications to implantation; - The patient's bones are mature; - Good compliance, willing and able to conduct follow-up observation as required. Exclusion Criteria: - ? Subjects who have participated in other clinical studies of drugs, biological agents or medical devices before being selected and did not reach the primary study endpoint; - The patient is known to have a history of allergy to one or more implanted materials; - Those who are physically weak or cannot tolerate surgery due to other diseases of the body; - Active infection in the knee joint or other parts of the body; ? Those with other ligament injury and/or meniscus injury in the affected knee joint; ? Those who need to perform simultaneous meniscus repair and other surgeries on the ipsilateral knee joint; ? Obese BMI>35; |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Peking University Third Hospital |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Lysholm score | An instrument used to assess the results of rehabilitation from knee injuries, especially those requiring ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. It measures recovery of knee joint function based on ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.
Year introduced: 2015 Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Asked as baseline data before surgery. | |
Primary | Lysholm score | An instrument used to assess the results of rehabilitation from knee injuries, especially those requiring ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. It measures recovery of knee joint function based on ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.
Year introduced: 2015 Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
At 6 months after surgery. | |
Primary | Lysholm score | An instrument used to assess the results of rehabilitation from knee injuries, especially those requiring ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. It measures recovery of knee joint function based on ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.
Year introduced: 2015 Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
At 9 months after surgery. | |
Primary | Lysholm score | An instrument used to assess the results of rehabilitation from knee injuries, especially those requiring ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. It measures recovery of knee joint function based on ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.
Year introduced: 2015 Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
At 14 months after surgery. | |
Secondary | The upper, middle and lower diameters of the tibial bone tunnel | The tunnel widening of the experimental group was measured compared with that of the control group. | Preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 9 months postoperatively, and 14 months postoperatively. | |
Secondary | Relative tibial anterior displacement | To compare whether the absorbable interface screws in the experimental group can effectively limit the anterior displacement of the tibia relative to the femur. | Preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 9 months postoperatively, and 14 months postoperatively. | |
Secondary | Range of motion (ROM) | Assessing active and passive flexion-extension angles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery | Preoperatively. | |
Secondary | International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000. | Currently, there are internationally recognized scales with reliability, validity and sensitivity for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury and rupture. Subjective and objective symptoms of the knee joint were comprehensively assessed. | Asked as baseline data before surgery. | |
Secondary | Tegner score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Asked as baseline data before surgery. | |
Secondary | International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000 | Currently, there are internationally recognized scales with reliability, validity and sensitivity for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury and rupture. Subjective and objective symptoms of the knee joint were comprehensively assessed. | At 6 months after surgery. | |
Secondary | International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000 | Currently, there are internationally recognized scales with reliability, validity and sensitivity for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury and rupture. Subjective and objective symptoms of the knee joint were comprehensively assessed. | At 9 months after surgery. | |
Secondary | International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000 | Currently, there are internationally recognized scales with reliability, validity and sensitivity for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury and rupture. Subjective and objective symptoms of the knee joint were comprehensively assessed. | At 14 months after surgery. | |
Secondary | Tegner score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 6 months after surgery. | |
Secondary | Tegner score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 9 months after surgery. | |
Secondary | Tegner score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 14 months after surgery. | |
Secondary | Relative tibial anterior displacement | To compare whether the absorbable interface screws in the experimental group | At 6 months postoperatively. | |
Secondary | Relative tibial anterior displacement | To compare whether the absorbable interface screws in the experimental group | At 9 months postoperatively. | |
Secondary | Relative tibial anterior displacement | To compare whether the absorbable interface screws in the experimental group | At 14 months postoperatively. | |
Secondary | Range of motion (ROM) | Assessing active and passive flexion-extension angles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery | At 6 months postoperatively. | |
Secondary | Range of motion (ROM) | Assessing active and passive flexion-extension angles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery | At 9 months postoperatively. | |
Secondary | Range of motion (ROM) | Assessing active and passive flexion-extension angles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery | At 14 months postoperatively. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05487768 -
Functional Connectivity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04390035 -
BFRT in Adolescents After ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02740452 -
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02555917 -
Comparison of Remnant Preserving Versus Remnant Resecting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00529958 -
Comparison of Three Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05109871 -
Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06048848 -
FNB in ACL Recon Under GA
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06048874 -
FNB in ACL Recon Under SA
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03529552 -
Evaluation After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Using the Bioresorbable Interference Screw (SMS): Resorbability, Per- and Post-operative Complications and Articular Functional Recovery.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04285853 -
Are Opioids Needed After ACL Reconstruction
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04088227 -
Effects of Platelet Rich Plasma Injections on Biomarkers After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03671421 -
Number One Overall Graft Pick? Hamstring vs Bone-Patellar-Tendon-Bone vs Quadriceps Tendon
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04957706 -
Diagnostic Study of ACL Rupture With Anterior Drawer Test at 90° of Hip Flexion
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04953676 -
A Clinical Trial of the Round-tunnel and Flat-tunnel Technique of ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03365908 -
Pain Management of ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06030791 -
BTB Graft Harvest and Donor Site Morbidity After ACL Reconstruction
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03950024 -
Improvement of Knowledge About the Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition in the Aftermath of Knee Trauma.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03229369 -
Association of ALL and ACL Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction in High-risk Population: a RCT.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01267435 -
Evaluation of Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position After Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06430775 -
Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
|