Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Clinical Trial
— ACLRSurgRCTOfficial title:
Outcomes Under Three Different Procedures for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, a Prospective Randomized Cohort Study
| Verified date | May 2022 |
| Source | Peking University Third Hospital |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
From June 1, 2016, to July 1, 2017, a total of 406 patients with ACL rupture were randomly assigned to three different ACL surgeries: anatomical single-bundle, central axial single-bundle and double-bundle. A prospective randomized cohort study was conducted.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 406 |
| Est. completion date | January 17, 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | February 12, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age from 18-45. 2. ACL rupture confirmed by both physical examination and MRI. 3. Surgery done by senior doctor. 4. Using STG as autograft. Exclusion Criteria: 1. With bilateral acl rupture. 2. Second injury. 3. Previous surgery in extremity. 4. With OA. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Yu Jiakuo |
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess graft healing | The difference in signal density between reconstructed ACL and PCL was used to measure graft ligamentation on MRI. Higher signal values represent higher inflammation and lower signal values represent better ligamentation. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Primary | Quadriceps strength | Side to side quadriceps strength assessed by Biodex arthrometer test | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Primary | Knee laxity (physical exam) | The side to side knee joint laxity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery can be divided into four grades: grade A: -1~2mm(0+), grade B: 3~5mm (1+), grade C: 6~10mm (2+) and D Grade: >10mm(3+) assessed by Lachman test of physical examination. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Primary | International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000 | Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Primary | Knee laxity (KT-2000 arthrometer) | The knee laxity test of the forward KT-2000 measured knee laxity at pressures of 132Nt, 88Nt, 66Nt, and 44Nt, respectively, while the back-pushing KT-2000 was measured at -132NT, 88Nt, 66Nt, and -44Nt. The foward-pushing KT-2000 asessed side-to-side can be stratified into five levels are (A) < - 1 mm, (B) - 1 to 1 mm, (C) 1-3 mm, (D) 3-5 mm and (E) > 5 mm.
The back-pushing KT-2000 is also divided into side to side differences as (A) < - 2 mm, (B) - 2 to - 0.5 mm, (C) - 0.5 to 0.5 mm, (D) 0.5-1 mm and ( E) > 1 mm. |
At 2 years after surgery | |
| Primary | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | Magnetic resonance was used to calculate the graft bending angle (GBA), which is the angle between the intra-femoral graft and the intra-articular graft. GBA is associated with graft widening and graft healing. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Primary | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | We used magnetic resonance 3D reconstruction to derive the area perpendicular to the bony canal and subdivide it into the proximal, mid and distal bony canal of the tibia and femur. Since CT is harmful to the human body, we used magnetic resonance imaging instead of CT to collect the last follow-up data of bone tract widening during the return visit. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Gender | Measuring whether gender is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure | At baseline | |
| Secondary | Age | Measuring whether age is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure | At baseline | |
| Secondary | BMI | Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2. Measuring whether bmi is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure | At baseline | |
| Secondary | Single-Legged Hop Test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the single hop for distance. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Single-Legged Hop Test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the single hop for distance. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Single-Legged Hop Test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the single hop for distance. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Triple hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the triple hop for distance. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Triple hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the triple hop for distance. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Triple hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the triple hop for distance. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Cross hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the cross hop for distance. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Cross hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the cross hop for distance. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Cross hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the cross hop for distance. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | 6-m hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the 6-meter hop for time. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | 6-m hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the 6-meter hop for time. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | 6-m hop test | The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded. The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites. Record the 6-meter hop for time. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADLS) Scale | The ADLS is a 14 item scale that queries patients about how their knee symptoms effect their ability to perform general daily activities (6 items) as well as how their knee condition effects their ability to perform specific functional tasks (8 items). Each item is scored 0-5 with 5 indicating "no difficulty" and 0 representing "unable to perform". The highest possible score is 70. The scores of all items are summed, divided by 70, then multiplied by 100 to give an overall ADLS percent rating. Higher percentages reflect higher levels of functional ability. This scale would be appropriate for patients who either do not participate in sports or recreational activities or for those who have not yet progressed to performing these activities | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADLS) Scale | The ADLS is a 14 item scale that queries patients about how their knee symptoms effect their ability to perform general daily activities (6 items) as well as how their knee condition effects their ability to perform specific functional tasks (8 items). Each item is scored 0-5 with 5 indicating "no difficulty" and 0 representing "unable to perform". The highest possible score is 70. The scores of all items are summed, divided by 70, then multiplied by 100 to give an overall ADLS percent rating. Higher percentages reflect higher levels of functional ability. This scale would be appropriate for patients who either do not participate in sports or recreational activities or for those who have not yet progressed to performing these activities | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADLS) Scale | The ADLS is a 14 item scale that queries patients about how their knee symptoms effect their ability to perform general daily activities (6 items) as well as how their knee condition effects their ability to perform specific functional tasks (8 items). Each item is scored 0-5 with 5 indicating "no difficulty" and 0 representing "unable to perform". The highest possible score is 70. The scores of all items are summed, divided by 70, then multiplied by 100 to give an overall ADLS percent rating. Higher percentages reflect higher levels of functional ability. This scale would be appropriate for patients who either do not participate in sports or recreational activities or for those who have not yet progressed to performing these activities | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee laxity | The side to side knee joint laxity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery can be divided into four grades: grade A: -1~2mm(0+), grade B: 3~5mm (1+), grade C: 6~10mm (2+) and D Grade: >10mm(3+) assessed by Lachman test of physical examination. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee laxity | The side to side knee joint laxity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery can be divided into four grades: grade A: -1~2mm(0+), grade B: 3~5mm (1+), grade C: 6~10mm (2+) and D Grade: >10mm(3+) assessed by Lachman test of physical examination. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Quadriceps strength | Side to side quadriceps strength assessed by Biodex arthrometer test | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Quadriceps strength | Side to side quadriceps strength assessed by Biodex arthrometer test | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Lysholm score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Lysholm score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Lysholm score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | Patients will be asked to fill out the KOOS score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | Patients will be asked to fill out the KOOS score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | Patients will be asked to fill out the KOOS score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000 | Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000 | Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Tegner Score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Tegner Score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Tegner Score | Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Short Form (SF)-36,The medical outcome study 36-items short form health survey (SF-36) | Patients will be asked to fill out the SF-36 to document the quality of life . General health-related quality of life: SF-36 physical component score (range 0 to 100; higher score = better health state) at 2 yearsTh minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 2 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Short Form (SF)-36 ,The medical outcome study 36-items short form health survey (SF-36) | Patients will be asked to fill out the SF-36 to document the quality of life.General health-related quality of life: SF-36 physical component score (range 0 to 100; higher score = better health state) at 5 years. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Short Form (SF)-36,The medical outcome study 36-items short form health survey | Patients will be asked to fill out the SF-36 to document the quality of life.General health-related quality of life: SF-36 physical component score (range 0 to 100; higher score = better health state) at 10 years. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | The difference in signal density between reconstructed ACL and PCL was used to measure graft ligamentation on MRI. Higher signal values represent higher inflammation and lower signal values represent better ligamentation. | At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | The difference in signal density between reconstructed ACL and PCL was used to measure graft ligamentation on MRI. Higher signal values represent higher inflammation and lower signal values represent better ligamentation. | At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee laxity (KT-2000 arthrometer) | The knee laxity test of the forward KT-2000 measured knee laxity at pressures of 132Nt, 88Nt, 66Nt, and 44Nt, respectively, while the back-pushing KT-2000 was measured at -132NT, 88Nt, 66Nt, and -44Nt. The foward-pushing KT-2000 asessed side-to-side can be stratified into five levels are (A) < - 1 mm, (B) - 1 to 1 mm, (C) 1-3 mm, (D) 3-5 mm and (E) > 5 mm.
The back-pushing KT-2000 is also divided into side to side differences as (A) < - 2 mm, (B) - 2 to - 0.5 mm, (C) - 0.5 to 0.5 mm, (D) 0.5-1 mm and ( E) > 1 mm. |
At 5 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Knee laxity (KT-2000 arthrometer) | The knee laxity test of the forward KT-2000 measured knee laxity at pressures of 132Nt, 88Nt, 66Nt, and 44Nt, respectively, while the back-pushing KT-2000 was measured at -132NT, 88Nt, 66Nt, and -44Nt. The foward-pushing KT-2000 asessed side-to-side can be stratified into five levels are (A) < - 1 mm, (B) - 1 to 1 mm, (C) 1-3 mm, (D) 3-5 mm and (E) > 5 mm.
The back-pushing KT-2000 is also divided into side to side differences as (A) < - 2 mm, (B) - 2 to - 0.5 mm, (C) - 0.5 to 0.5 mm, (D) 0.5-1 mm and ( E) > 1 mm. |
At 10 years after surgery | |
| Secondary | Computed tomography (CT) | Computed tomography was used to acquire a baseline of the bone tunnel one days after ACL reconstruction for comparison in studies of bone tunnel widening at follow-up visits. | At 1 days after surgery.(baseline) |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT04062578 -
Effects Provided by a Physiotherapy Treatment Preventing Lower Extremity Injuries in Female Football Players
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05461326 -
Quadriceps Tendon Versus Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Autograft ACL Reconstruction RCT
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05109871 -
Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05504018 -
Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of ACL Reconstruction Results
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06185231 -
Investigation of the Effects of Vibration Therapy on Pain, Functionality, and Proprioception After ACL Injury
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03968913 -
Biologic Therapy to Prevent Osteoarthritis After ACL Injury
|
Early Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT04408690 -
Feasibility of a RCT That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair After ACL Injury
|
Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06222814 -
Evaluation of the Results of Two Different Methods in Management of Antero-lateral Instability of the Knee
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05614297 -
Agreement Between Rolimeter and Lachmeter in Patients With ACL Injury
|
||
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05184023 -
The Effect of PEMF for Patients With Quadriceps Muscle Weakness After ACLR
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04906538 -
Objective Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Internal Suture Augmentation Technique
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT05014009 -
The Influence of Neuromuscular Training on Whole-body Movement Strategies and Knee Mechanics During Change-of-direction Tasks in Sports Science Students
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06083818 -
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Protocol in Female Football Players With Dynamic Knee Valgus
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05584020 -
Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04580290 -
Jewel ACL Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT04888052 -
Prolonged Preoperative Rehabilitation in ACL Rupture.
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06430775 -
Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
|
||
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT05580133 -
All-Inside Single-Bundle for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Full Thickness of the Peroneus Longus Tendon Compared to the Six-strand-hamstring Autograft (ACL)
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT04162613 -
Can Sensorimotor Function Predict Graft Rupture After ACL Reconstruction
|
||
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT05619393 -
Comparison of Kinematic Movements Between ACL Deficiency With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy People
|
N/A |