Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05342857 |
Other study ID # |
20211006R |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
April 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2022 |
Source |
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital |
Contact |
Cheng-Kuo Cheng, MD |
Phone |
886-2833-2211 |
Email |
ckcheng.md[@]gmail.com |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
To evaluate the duration of effectiveness of anti-VEGF (Aflibercept) by analyzing the
percentage of patients whose maximum treatment interval is extended to 16 weeks and beyond in
24 months and their long-term remission.
Description:
This is an Observational, prospective, single arm study. The distribution of maximum
treatment interval extended within 2 year among nAMD patients with Aflibercept
Treat-and-Extend(T&E) regimen will be analyzed. And Clinical indicators for fast extension of
treatment interval and emering disease activity will be captured.
To maximize Vision acuity (VA) outcome and reduce treatment burden of neovascular age-related
macular degeneration (nAMD) patients, the T&E regimen has become popular in recent years.
Sufficient drug durability is the key element to support T&E regimen. Clinical trials with
aflibercept suggest a longer duration of VEGF suppression than with bevacizumab or
ranibizumab, which is also supported by pharmacokinetic models, and mean duration of vitreous
VEGF suppression by aflibercept injection was demonstrated as > 71 ± 18 days. With these
attributes, while managed by intravitreal injection aflibercept (IVI-ALF) T&E regimen, it has
been shown in ALTAIR study that around 40% and 60% of patients had treatment interval
extended to 12 week and 16 weeks at week 96 respectively.
Nevertheless, it was observed that the distribution of treatment interval is polarized, a
group of patients would eventually reach a stable disease status with only few treatments
needed per year, while another group of patients may still need more intensive treatment even
shorter than 8 week interval. To maximize benefit of patients with practical and personalized
IVT-AFL T&E regimens, it is important to provided further evidence to support maximizing
treatment interval as well as clinical indicators to take precise action to active disease.
Therefore, this study is designed to understand the potential durability of Aflibercept by
analyzing maximum treatment interval with IVT-AFL in 2 years, and explore clinical indicators
to guide optimal T&E regimen for each patient.
Patients are treated with Aflibercept 2.0 mg following the T&E criteria in Taiwan local
consensus (listed as below). Once the treatment interval is extended to 16 weeks, and the
patient has two consecutive 16-week treatment interval, treatment strategy will be changed to
pro re nata (PRN) with monthly follow-up. IVI-AFL will immediately be applied once there is
any disease activity detected.
During the study, patients will be monitored with BCVA, fundus photograph, structural OCT,
OCT Angiography.
T&E criteria in Taiwan local consensus:
- Extension: No BCVA loss ≥ 5 ETDRS letters (or 1 line of Snellen chart) AND dry
retina§,†, #
- Maintain: No BCVA loss ≥ 5 ETDRS letters (or 1 line of Snellen chart) AND non-increased
fluid§
- Shortening: Any increased fluid with BCVA loss ≥ 5 ETDRS letters (or 1 line of Snellen
chart)‡, # OR new macular hemorrhage OR new neovascularization
"§"Absence of macular hemorrhage and neovascularization is required.
"†"Non-increased fluid after 3 more consecutive monthly injections following initial
treatment could be considered as persistent fluid, and the injection interval could be
extended if VA is stable.
"‡" Either increased fluid or BCVA loss ≥ 5 ETDRS letters alone could be maintained at
current treatment interval.
"#" Extension or shortening can be by 2 or 4 weeks