Clinical Trials Logo
  1. Home
  2. Other
  3. NCT04509180

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Between Convergent Procedure and Catheter Ablation for Persistent and Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Trial

Official title:
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Between Convergent Procedure and Catheter Ablation for Persistent and Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trial Summary

In the last 20 years, atrial fibrillation has become one of the leading healthcare burden in Europe and other developed countries. With an ever-increasing prevalence and incidence, atrial fibrillation is expected to remain a significant problem in the near future. Due to numerous detrimental effects atrial fibrillation has on the patient's health, having an efficient and safe treatment is crucial for managing the problem. The gold standard for an atrial fibrillation treatment is a catheter ablation. In typical catheter ablation procedure, triggers in pulmonary veins are addressed with a pulmonary vein isolation- offering a high long-term success rate in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, the same cannot be said for persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation. Studies have shown that efficiency of catheter ablation for persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation, including multiple procedures per patient, ranges around 50 %. It is postulated that extrapulmonary vein triggers, such as foci located in the posterior wall of the left atrium, play an important role in initiating and maintaining persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation. In the past, to address this issue, a convergent procedure was developed. In convergent procedure an epicardial ablation of posterior wall is performed through a subxyphoid window. Next, an endocardial ablation with an ablation catheter is performed to isolate pulmonary veins. Because the epicardial lesions are applied in the opposite direction and not towards the esophagus, ablation of posterior wall can safely be performed. The procedure offers a high long-term success rate (85%) in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation. However, due to higher associated invasiveness, the convergent procedure carries a higher risk of complications compared with catheter ablation (4 % vs 9 %). With advancements in ablation catheter technology, such as continuous force measurement at the tip of the catheter, the depth and volume of the lesion can be estimated. This information greatly increases the reliability of lesion formation. The operator can thus effectively apply lesions to the posterior wall of the left atrium more safely in regards to the collateral damage to the esophagus. The objectives of the study are: - To compare procedural, safety and efficiency profile of convergent procedure with catheter ablation procedure, both targeting pulmonary veins triggers and triggers located in the posterior wall of the left atrium. - To compare long-term success rate of convergent procedure with catheter ablation procedure, both targeting pulmonary veins triggers and triggers located in the posterior wall of the left atrium.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details
NCT number NCT04509180
Study type Interventional
Source University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Contact
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
Start date February 26, 2021
Completion date September 1, 2024
View Details
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05970120 - A Study of Intracardiac Ultrasound With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter N/A
Recruiting NCT05416086 - iCLAS™ Cryoablation System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study N/A
Completed NCT03650556 - Safety and Effectiveness of TactiCath™ Contact Force, Sensor Enabled™ (TactiCath SE) Catheter for Ablation of Drug Refractory, Symptomatic, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation N/A
Recruiting NCT04085731 - Driver-guided Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillatiom
Withdrawn NCT02344394 - Comparison of Hybrid Ablation and Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone vs Hybrid Ablation With PVI Plus Catheter Ablation N/A
Terminated NCT01683045 - Efficacy and Safety Study of the Estech COBRA® Surgical System to Treat Patients With a History of Irregular Heart Beats N/A
Completed NCT01694563 - ABLATE Post Approval Study - Synergy Ablation Lesions for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03643224 - DiamondTemp™ System for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation N/A
Withdrawn NCT05093868 - Electrographic Flow Mapping Validation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (EVAL AF) N/A
Completed NCT05152966 - Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE™ Cardiac Ablation System Plus in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation(PersAFOne II) N/A
Completed NCT05043883 - Automated Assessment of PVI Using a Novel EP Recording System N/A
Completed NCT04022954 - HD Mapping of Atrial Fibrillation in Asia Pacific
Active, not recruiting NCT06124690 - Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Without the Evidence of Low-voltage Areas N/A
Completed NCT06260670 - FLOW EVAL-AF: FLOW Mapping Electrogram VALidation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05454111 - CARTO-Finder Guided Ablation Versus Multiscale Entropy Guided Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05077670 - Hybrid Characterization of Driver Sites During Atrial Fibrillation and Sinus Rhythm
Withdrawn NCT03835338 - WATCHMAN for Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation and Occlusion to Treat Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Rhythm N/A
Completed NCT02275104 - Multimodal Image Processing Software to Guide Cardiac Ablation Therapy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05565183 - Combined Study of ATrial Strain and Voltage by High Density Mapping in Young Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. N/A
Completed NCT02274857 - Randomized Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation Treatment With Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Guided Procedures N/A