Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04431063
Other study ID # 18-10-1173
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 1, 2018
Est. completion date June 30, 2022

Study information

Verified date May 2023
Source Indonesia University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Injury of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is one of the most common sports injuries. The incidence rate reaches 68.6 cases per 100,000 people per year. Management of ACL injuries for individuals who want to return to the level of exercise activity as before, mostly in the form of reconstructive surgery. As many as 60,000 to 175,000 cases of ACL reconstruction per year are carried out in the United States At present, many reconstructive surgeries are performed by taking tendon grafts on the patient's own body (autograft) to then be used instead of the ACL. The most widely used graft sources are Hamstring and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) grafts. Other alternative grafts are Quadriceps tendon, Fascia Lata, Iliotibial Band, and Peroneus Longus Tendon. Each graft retrieval technique has advantages and disadvantages. BPTB graft has the best tensile strength and bone union with bone, but the complications of anterior knee pain are also quite common (5-55%). Hamstring grafts and Quadriceps grafts minimize the complications of anterior knee pain, with fairly good tensile strength, but the union of grafts with bone takes longer. The loss of Hamstring tendons also causes a decrease in muscle strength in Hamstring, where Hamstring has an important role in preventing the anterior translation of the tibia Peroneus Longus Tendon graft is an alternative graft developed to minimize complications associated with graft use from the area around the knee. Peroneus Longus tendons also have tensile strength similar to Hamstring tendons. As with other graft extracts, Peroneus Longus tendon graft is also accompanied by complications in the donor site. Possible complications arising from the loss of the Peroneus Longus tendon include ankle instability and decreased flexion strength of the 1st ray and ankle eversion. Research carried out by Bancha et al showed a reduction in flexion strength of 1st ray and ankle eversion significantly, without any instability in the ankle. Peroneus longus provides 5.5% strength for moderate dorsiflexion for ankle eversion movements, peroneus longus is the main muscle. But in other studies it is said that the use of peroneus longus graft does not interfere with the stability of the ankle and ROM. Does not even affect the functional outcome of the ankle However, in a study conducted by Bancha et al and Kerimoglu et al., The technique used for taking Peroneus Longus graft tendons did not include suturing in the distal stump of Peroneous Longus. So with this study, researchers wanted to find out whether different results would be found related to donor site complications if the technique used included suturing the distal stump of the Peroneus Longus tendon against the peroneus brevis tendon


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 24
Est. completion date June 30, 2022
Est. primary completion date December 1, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with total ACL rupture using peroneus longus graft - The suturing procedure for the distal stump peroneus longus against the peroneus brevis tendon is performed by orthopedic specialists or resident chiefs who have been given training in advance. Exclusion Criteria: - Osteoarthtis Knee Kellgren-Lawrence III and IV - Osteoarthtis Knee Kellgren-Lawrence III and IV - Flatfoot as evidenced by physical examination and footprinting

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Rupture
  • Rupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Intervention

Procedure:
Distal Stump Suturing
in ACL Reconstruction case , Group A consist of subject with operation procedure suturing the distal stump peroneus longus against the peroneus brevis in ACL reconstruction using the peroneus longus autograft.

Locations

Country Name City State
Indonesia Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta DKI Jakarta

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Indonesia University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Indonesia, 

References & Publications (31)

Angthong C, Chernchujit B, Apivatgaroon A, Chaijenkit K, Nualon P, Suchao-in K. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with the Peroneus Longus Tendon: A Biomechanical and Clinical Evaluation of the Donor Ankle Morbidity. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):555-60. — View Citation

Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1751-67. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279922. — View Citation

Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):1579-602. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279913. — View Citation

Cerulli G, Placella G, Sebastiani E, Tei MM, Speziali A, Manfreda F. ACL Reconstruction: Choosing the Graft. Joints. 2013 Jun 12;1(1):18-24. eCollection 2013 Mar. — View Citation

Click Fenter P, Bellew JW, Pitts T, Kay R. A comparison of 3 hand-held dynamometers used to measure hip abduction strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Aug;17(3):531-5. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)0172.0.co;2. — View Citation

Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Schneider T, Bruggemann GP, Koebke J. Biomechanical testing of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone grafts: an alternative graft source for press-fit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 May;126(4):265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0048-7. Epub 2005 Sep 17. — View Citation

Felmet G. Implant-free press-fit fixation for bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction: 10-year results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Aug;130(8):985-92. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1050-2. Epub 2010 Jan 22. — View Citation

Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):2-11. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310011501. — View Citation

Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):331-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907797. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 26;363(9):893. — View Citation

Gonzalez-Martin C, Pita-Fernandez S, Seoane-Pillado T, Lopez-Calvino B, Pertega-Diaz S, Gil-Guillen V. Variability between Clarke's angle and Chippaux-Smirak index for the diagnosis of flat feet. Colomb Med (Cali). 2017 Mar 30;48(1):25-31. — View Citation

Kerimoglu S, Aynaci O, Saracoglu M, Aydin H, Turhan AU. [Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008 Jan-Feb;42(1):38-43. doi: 10.3944/aott.2008.038. Turkish. — View Citation

Lee YH, Kuroda R, Zhao J, Chan KM. A tale of 10 European centres - 2010 APOSSM travelling fellowship review in ACL surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012 Jul 28;4(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-27. — View Citation

Lin TW, Cardenas L, Soslowsky LJ. Biomechanics of tendon injury and repair. J Biomech. 2004 Jun;37(6):865-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.11.005. — View Citation

Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2321-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00539. — View Citation

McGuine TA, Winterstein AP, Carr K, Hetzel S. Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life and Knee Function After Knee Injury in Young Female Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Apr 22;2(4):2325967114530988. doi: 10.1177/2325967114530988. eCollection 2014 Apr. — View Citation

Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Adair B, Pua YH, Williams GP, McGaw R, Clark RA. Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0140822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140822. eCollection 2015. — View Citation

Mihelic R, Jurdana H, Jotanovic Z, Madjarevic T, Tudor A. Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17-20 years. Int Orthop. 2011 Jul;35(7):1093-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1206-x. Epub 2011 Feb 2. — View Citation

Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD005960. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005960.pub2. — View Citation

Murley GS, Tan JM, Edwards RM, De Luca J, Munteanu SE, Cook JL. Foot posture is associated with morphometry of the peroneus longus muscle, tibialis anterior tendon, and Achilles tendon. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Jun;24(3):535-41. doi: 10.1111/sms.12025. Epub 2013 Jan 10. — View Citation

Pavlik A, Hidas P, Tallay A, Toman J, Berkes I. Femoral press-fit fixation technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: a prospective clinical evaluation of 285 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):220-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279920. Epub 2005 Oct 6. — View Citation

Pita-Fernandez S, Gonzalez-Martin C, Seoane-Pillado T, Lopez-Calvino B, Pertega-Diaz S, Gil-Guillen V. Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older. J Epidemiol. 2015;25(2):148-54. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140082. Epub 2014 Nov 8. — View Citation

Quatman CE, Hewett TE. The anterior cruciate ligament injury controversy: is "valgus collapse" a sex-specific mechanism? Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43(5):328-35. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.059139. Epub 2009 Apr 15. Erratum In: Br J Sports Med. 2021 Aug;55(16):e6. — View Citation

Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1502-7. doi: 10.1177/03635465166 — View Citation

Schindler OS. Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a historical perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):5-47. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1756-x. Epub 2011 Nov 22. — View Citation

Silver RL, de la Garza J, Rang M. The myth of muscle balance. A study of relative strengths and excursions of normal muscles about the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 May;67(3):432-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.67B3.3997956. — View Citation

Surburg PR, Suomi R, Poppy WK. Validity and reliability of a hand-held dynamometer with two populations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(5):229-34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.16.5.229. — View Citation

van Dijk PA, Lubberts B, Verheul C, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs GM. Rehabilitation after surgical treatment of peroneal tendon tears and ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1165-74. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3944-6. Epub 2016 Jan 23. — View Citation

van Eck CF, Kropf EJ, Romanowski JR, Lesniak BP, Tranovich MJ, van Dijk CN, Fu FH. Factors that influence the intra-articular rupture pattern of the ACL graft following single-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Aug;19(8):1243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1427-y. Epub 2011 Feb 11. — View Citation

Willis-Owen CA, Hearn TC, Keene GC, Costi JJ. Biomechanical testing of implant free wedge shaped bone block fixation for bone patellar tendon bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a bovine model. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010 Sep 2;5:66. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-5-66. — View Citation

Yang G, Rothrauff BB, Tuan RS. Tendon and ligament regeneration and repair: clinical relevance and developmental paradigm. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2013 Sep;99(3):203-222. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21041. — View Citation

Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x. Epub 2006 Aug 15. — View Citation

* Note: There are 31 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Preoperative hand dynamometer value Value of objective measurement of the strength of the medial part of the plantarflexion in the one metatarsal head with the hand of the Dynamometer when the patient is supine. The measurement is done 3 times and the value used is the average of the 3 times the measurement. Healthy ankles were also examined as a comparison with the same measurement method. There is no minimum and maximum value, and the higher value the better the outcome This measurement was carried out at the preoperative setting
Primary Three-months postoperative hand dynamometer value Value of objective measurement of the strength of the medial part of the plantarflexion in the one metatarsal head with the hand of the Dynamometer when the patient is supine. The measurement is done 3 times and the value used is the average of the 3 times the measurement. Healthy ankles were also examined as a comparison with the same measurement method. There is no minimum and maximum value, and the higher value the better the outcome This measurement was carried out at 3 months postoperatively
Primary Six-months postoperative hand dynamometer value Value of objective measurement of the strength of the medial part of the plantarflexion in the one metatarsal head with the hand of the Dynamometer when the patient is supine. The measurement is done 3 times and the value used is the average of the 3 times the measurement. Healthy ankles were also examined as a comparison with the same measurement method. There is no minimum and maximum value, and the higher value the better the outcome This measurement was carried out at 6 months postoperatively
Primary Preoperative Clark's Angle Value the value of the objective angle measurement on the footprint by drawing a line from the medial side of the one metatarsal head and the heel against the second line which is connecting the one metatrsal head and the peak of the medial longitudinal arch. Clarke Angle of < 31° means there is tendency to flatness and/or pronation. angle of 31° to < 45° is the normal range. Clarke Angle of > 45° means there is tendency to cavus foot This measurement was carried out at the preoperative setting
Primary Three-months Clark's Angle Value the value of the objective angle measurement on the footprint by drawing a line from the medial side of the one metatarsal head and the heel against the second line which is connecting the one metatrsal head and the peak of the medial longitudinal arch. Clarke Angle of < 31° means there is tendency to flatness and/or pronation. angle of 31° to < 45° is the normal range. Clarke Angle of > 45° means there is tendency to cavus foot This measurement was carried out at the 3 months postoperatively
Primary Six-months Clark's Angle Value the value of the objective angle measurement on the footprint by drawing a line from the medial side of the one metatarsal head and the heel against the second line which is connecting the one metatrsal head and the peak of the medial longitudinal arch. Clarke Angle of < 31° means there is tendency to flatness and/or pronation. angle of 31° to < 45° is the normal range. Clarke Angle of > 45° means there is tendency to cavus foot This measurement was carried out at the 6 months postoperatively
Primary Preoperative the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AOFAS score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible Examination carried out 4 times for each patient in preoperative setting
Primary Three months postoperative the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AOFAS score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible Examination carried out 4 times for each patient in 3 months postoperatively
Primary Six months postoperative the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AOFAS score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible Examination carried out 4 times for each patient in 6 months postoperatively
Primary Preoperative visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA) the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. VAS-FA score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible Examination carried out 4 times for each patient at preoperative setting
Primary Three-months postoperative visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA) the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AS-FA score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible Examination carried out 4 times for each patient at 3 months postoperatively
Primary Six-months postoperative visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA) the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AS-FA score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible Examination carried out 4 times for each patient at 6 months postoperatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02524652 - Local Infiltration Analgesia vs Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Phase 4
Recruiting NCT02511158 - French Prospective Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Cohort Study (FAST)
Recruiting NCT02074917 - Comparison of Dynamic Knee Stability and Functional Outcomes in Anatomical ACL Reconstruction at AM or Central Position N/A
Completed NCT02584452 - Trial Evaluating Postop Pain and Muscle Strength Among Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Ambulatory ACL Reconstruction N/A
Completed NCT01300182 - The Effect of Early WBVT on Neuromuscular Control After ACLR N/A
Recruiting NCT00971451 - Quadriceps Function Prior to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction N/A
Completed NCT02420353 - Evaluation of rGH Therapy to Prevent Muscle Atrophy in Patients With ACL Tears Phase 2
Completed NCT02173483 - Anterior Cruciate Ligament-reconstruction: Quadriceps Tendon or Hamstrings Tendon? A Prospective Trial N/A
Completed NCT02754674 - Comparison of Femoral Tunnel and Clinical Outcome Using Two Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques N/A
Completed NCT01440348 - Simultaneous Multiple Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using a Single Achilles Allograft Phase 4
Completed NCT01391650 - Stability of the Knee Joint After Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02833454 - Study of the Anatomical Direct Insertion Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02834962 - Study of Single And Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Graft Cross-sectional Dimensions N/A
Completed NCT02300012 - A Pilot Study to Investigate Biomarkers in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Patients and Healthy Controls N/A
Completed NCT02939677 - Can Targeted Exercise Improve Knee Strength Following ACLR (RATE) N/A
Completed NCT02817399 - The Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation N/A
Recruiting NCT02771548 - Biomechanical Analysis of Dynamic Tasks and Muscular Strength Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Completed NCT01361789 - COX-2 Inhibitor Versus Glucocorticoid Versus Both Combined Phase 4
Completed NCT00463099 - Multicenter Orthopaedics Outcomes Network for ACL Reconstructions
Active, not recruiting NCT02680821 - Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) With Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Surgery N/A