Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Single-use medical instruments are intended by the manufacturers for single-use only or for single-patient-use only. Nevertheless, single-use instruments are being reused more than once in many countries around the world. The reasons are mainly economic in developing countries and environmental in developed countries. Concerns are being raised regarding reused instruments sterility and efficacy. Since there is paucity of evidence on safety of multiple use of single-use instruments in surgery, we decided to conduct a clinical study comparing the same surgical procedure performed with new versus reused surgical instrument. We decided to study laparoscopic appendectomy which is a simple and the most common emergency surgery. Instrument under the scrutiny is ultrasonic scalpel which uses high-frequency ultrasound vibration for coagulating and cutting tissue. In the studied period of time, all eligible patients with acute appendicitis will be randomized in two groups, first having surgery with new device and the second having surgery with reused device. Removed appendix will be analyzed for lateral thermal damage and the patients will be followed-up for one month for potential differences in clinical outcomes like pain-killers consumption, length of stay and postoperative complications.


Clinical Trial Description

Laparoscopic appendectomy provides enhanced recovery at increased costs due to a need for a specific sophisticated equipment. Currently many of the commonly used devices are labeled by manufacturers as single-use only. This trend has stronghold in concerns about patient safety, especially about prevention of cross-infections and other safety-related issues. On the other hand, surgery costs are increased exponentially. There is paucity of evidence on safety of reusing single-use devices (SUD) in surgery. Reuse of SUD which may include refurbishing or reprocessing and resterilization is a complex issue with moral, technical, economical and environmental repercussions. There are several papers discussing the ethical dilemmas involved. The reprocessed instruments are generally deemed equally safe as new one. However there are only few experimental and clinical studies on this topic. Most of them are influenced by sponsors or manufacturers and therefore biased. What's more their conclusions are sometimes highly controversial. Goal of this study is to provide solid evidence on safety of reuse of SUD and to discover differences in in-vitro and clinical outcomes. One of the most common SUD for laparoscopic surgery is ultrasonic scalpel which uses high-frequency jaw vibration which simultaneously coagulates and divides structures with minimal thermal damage to surrounding tissue. One of the best known ultrasonic shears intended for single-use is harmonic scalpel (Ultracision® Ethicon EndoSurgery, Johnson&Johnson Company). Ultrasonic shears are being refurbished and/or resterilized for repetitive use in limited number of cycles or until become dysfunctional or disintegrate. Routine depends on local regulations and variations in practice. To encourage or to ban aforementioned practice we need solid evidence based on properly conducted clinical trial. Therefore we have designed a single-blind randomised clinical trial depending on virginity of instrument used for tissue dissection. Since Ultracision device is the most commonly used ultrasonic sealing device we decided to study outcomes of surgery performed with the new (unused) instrument versus resterilized reused instrument.

All of the patients with clinical and radiological suspicion of having acute appendicitis will be blindly allocated in two arms according to the predefined random sequence provided by independent statistician. Eligible patients will sign an informed consent form. First arm will have laparoscopic appendectomy with new ultrasonic device. The patient will be blinded for the allocation, but the surgeon can not be blinded since packing of the new and reused instruments differ. Even if the scrub nurse would give surgeon instruments without packing, some minor damage might be seen on the plastic coating of the instrument jaws. The second arm will have laparoscopic appendectomy with reused ultrasonic device. All other treatment including surgical technique, postoperative management and follow-up will be unchanged or within the standard of care. Surgical technique is standardised three-trocar approach in general anesthesia. All other details of the surgery are variable depending on local findings, extent of inflammation, anatomy variations etc. Removed specimens will be analyzed routinely with addition of measurement of lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base. Patients will be screened for antibiotic therapy length, analgesics consumption, early surgical complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification and length of stay. Additionally one month follow-up will be conducted to pick-up possible late complications or readmissions. Study will be conducted in two centers for a period of time until sufficient number of participants are recruited. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04226482
Study type Interventional
Source University of Split, School of Medicine
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date May 27, 2019
Completion date May 14, 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04485481 - Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study of ADX-914 in Healthy Adult Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT03473236 - Phase 1A Safety Trial of Inhaled PK10571 (GB002) Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT03683953 - The Treatment of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia by Intratracheal Instillation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05546567 - NOPARK Open Label Extension Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05413226 - Effect of Different Ingestion Doses of Celastrol on Human Sperm Motility N/A
Recruiting NCT05112159 - Study of IPG1094 in Healthy Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT04689035 - A Phase 1 Study in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AVLX-144 Phase 1
Completed NCT04335045 - Phase I Study of PH100 (Ecklonia Cava Phlorotannins) Phase 1
Completed NCT05037227 - Safety Profile Following Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged >18 Years in Indonesia
Recruiting NCT05517291 - DCB Versus Primary Selective Stenting in TASC C/D Femoropopliteal Artery Disease N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06446778 - Haemodynamic Mechanisms and Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study of the Pipeline Flow-diverting Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Pipeline Flow-diverting Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
Recruiting NCT04573049 - The Effectiveness and Safety of Levosimendan in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Heart Failure Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Phase 4
Completed NCT05585463 - Safety of Acupuncture and Intracutaneous Needles in Pediatric Cancer Patients: a Retrospective Study (ACUSAFE2021)
Completed NCT04188821 - Reduction of Seroma and Improvement of QoL in Breast Reconstruction With Tissue Expander N/A
Completed NCT03667430 - Safety Evaluation of Porous Silica in Men N/A
Completed NCT04499482 - Safety and Tolerability of Soy Fiber N/A
Completed NCT03141905 - Sick-Day Protocol to Improve Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease N/A
Completed NCT05244161 - A Quasi-experimental Evaluation of the Malezi Program in Tanzania N/A
Recruiting NCT03791372 - Clinical Effect and Safety of Autologous Umbilical Cord Blood Transfusion in the Treatment of Cerebral Palsy Phase 1
Withdrawn NCT04759066 - The HEALiX™ Intubated Patient (IP) Pilot Study N/A