Medical Education, Simulation, Crisis Resource Management Clinical Trial
— CRITIQueOfficial title:
Crisis Resource Management Improvement Through Intellectual Questioning of Authority
| Verified date | March 2021 |
| Source | National University Hospital, Singapore |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
This is a randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of a teaching intervention on residents' and medical students' ability to challenge clearly wrong decisions by a superior during a simulated life-threatening crisis. Participants will be randomly allocated into the control or intervention arm. The intervention arm will receive education on crisis resource management (CRM) and teaching targeting the cognitive skills required to monitor and challenge a superior's decision, and conflict resolution tools. Participants will then take part in a simulation scenario 2 to 4 weeks later and will be assessed based on 6 challenge points, followed by a debrief session.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 25 |
| Est. completion date | November 20, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | September 20, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 21 Years and older |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Medical officers or Internal medicine, surgical and emergency medicine residents who are in their 2nd post-graduate year of training, or - Phase V medical students from Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore Exclusion Criteria: - Refusal for informed consent, or - Refusal for video recording during simulation sessions |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singapore | National University Hospital, Singapore | Singapore |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| National University Hospital, Singapore |
Singapore,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Qualitative analysis of themes surrounding hierarchy and challenging authority | Themes elicited during open disclosure and discussion during debrief session with participants | 10 minutes | |
| Primary | Effect of a teaching intervention on participants' ability to challenge clearly wrong decisions by a superior during a simulated life-threatening crisis | Comparison of the best modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score (mAIS) responses of the 6 challenge opportunities between the intervention and control groups. The mAIS is a modification of the Advocacy-Inquiry method which includes five scoring levels with the addition of a sixth level when a trainee attempts to take over management of the case. | 20 minutes | |
| Secondary | Influence of the confederate's gender on participant's ability to challenge incorrect decisions | Comparison of the median modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score (mAIS) responses between the subjects exposed to male versus female confederate specialist. The mAIS is a modification of the Advocacy-Inquiry method which includes five scoring levels with the addition of a sixth level when a trainee attempts to take over management of the case. | 20 minutes |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06219005 -
Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block Training Model and Evaluation Method
|
N/A |