Induced; Birth Clinical Trial
Official title:
Dilapan vs Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening [COMRED - Comparison of Misoprostol Ripening Efficacy With Dilapan]
The purpose of this study is to find out if Dilapan works as well as Misoprostol for preparing the mouth of the uterus (cervix) for inducing labor in women who need to undergo this procedure. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of Dilapan for cervical ripening compared to Misoprostol in women undergoing Induction of labor (IOL) at or more than 37 weeks gestation.
In developed nations 25 % of pregnant women undergo labor induction for various indications. Likelihood of vaginal delivery depends on the degree of ripeness of cervix. Majority of women undergoing induction of labor are candidates for cervical ripening. Dilapan is an osmotic hygroscopic dilator of cervix commonly used for cervical preparation for mid trimester abortions. It has been proven safe for use for induction of Labor (IOL) at term. Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, widely used for cervical ripening and IOL in United States and is considered as standard of care. This is a non-inferiority, unblinded randomized, controlled trial where 322 eligible participants undergoing IOL at >37 weeks gestation and admitted to labor and delivery unit will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a ratio 1:1 to either receive Dilapan or Misoprostol for cervical ripening. After randomization all participants will undergo assessment as per standard of care. Participants will have either 1-5 Dilapan rods inserted into their cervix by the providers or receive 25 mcg of misoprostol orally every 2 hours to a maximum of 6 doses over 12 hours. Participants will be evaluated for artificial rupture of membranes and initiation of oxytocin for inducing uterine contraction. A diagnosis of failed IOL will be made if patient does not go into active labor within 24 hours after initiation of Oxytocin and Artificial Rupture Of Membranes (AROM). Intrapartum management will be according to institutional guidelines. All participants will be followed up and contacted by phone 2 weeks after discharge regarding their experience with the method of induction. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03730220 -
The Norwegian Induction Project: a Pilot for a Prospective National Audit
|
||
Completed |
NCT05100264 -
Effect of Acidic Vaginal pH on the Efficacy of Dinoprostone for Labor Induction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05037617 -
The REDUCED-I Pilot Trial: REDucing the Utilization of CEsarean Sections With Induction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06272591 -
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction With Home Induction and In-patient Induction.
|
||
Completed |
NCT04017247 -
Continuous Versus Intermittent Oxytocin Infusion for Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05062343 -
Cook Balloon vs Dilapan-S for Outpatient Cervical Ripening
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02788305 -
Effect of Maternal Obesity on Labour Induction in Postdate Pregnancy
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04004845 -
Labor Protocol Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06053073 -
Induction to Labour With Double Cervical Ballon at Home Versus at Hospital
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04645823 -
Spinal Fentanyl or Epidural Analgesia in the Early First Phase of Induced Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04746248 -
Outpatient Labor Induction Using Oral Misoprostol in Norway
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05671224 -
Visual Aids for Induction of Labor RCT
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04756089 -
Stimulation Therapy for Inducing Mothers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05798728 -
Outpatient Transcervical Balloon For Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04739683 -
Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04307199 -
Membrane Sweeping to Prevent Post-term Pregnancy: The MILO Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03725397 -
Inpatient Versus Outpatient Foley Cervical Ripening Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05719467 -
SAINT: Safe Induction of Labor Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03113227 -
Value of Measuring Cervical Angle and Length by Ultrasound in Prediction of Successful Induction of Delivery
|
N/A |