Altered Passive Eruption of Teeth Clinical Trial
Official title:
Experimental Gingivitis in Patients With Altered Passive Eruption: A Case Control Study
Altered passive eruption (APE) is an anatomical condition that is frequently diagnosed in periodontal clinical practice, especially for the ever-increasing demand of patients for the aesthetic improvement of their smile. In addition to its aesthetic value, however, altered passive eruption could also affect gingival and periodontal health. In fact, in the case of plaque accumulation, the altered passive eruption (APE) is likely to be a predisposing factor for a more rapid progression of gingivitis with higher inflammation indexes (Angulated Bleeding Score - AngBs and Modified Gingival Index - mGI). Notwithstanding, even if gingivitis in patients with altered passive eruption is developed much more rapidly, thorough home oral hygiene and plaque control conduces to complete clinical recovery. Further studies with a large number of patients are required to confirm the correlation between altered passive eruption and periodontal diseases.
Study hypothesis
Despite the fact that many authors suggest that the patients with altered passive eruption
are more susceptible to gingivitis and periodontitis due to the excess of gingiva, which
impedes the correct oral hygiene procedure, there is to-date no clinical study confirming
this assumption. The aim of the present study is therefore to examine the onset, progress and
the healing of experimental gingivitis in patients with altered passive eruption when
compared to patients with normal gingival anatomy.
Study design This is single centre interventional non randomised case-control study.
Interventions To achieve optimum gingival health and to standardize gingival baseline
conditions all subjects participated in a pretrial period 7 days before T0. On day 7(T0),
after professional scaling and polishing a powered toothbrush (Oral-B pro 3000, Braun,
Procter and Gamble, USA), individually chosen interdental brush (Tepe, Sweden), and standard
toothpaste (AZ - pro expert, Procter and Gamble, USA), along with oral hygiene instructions,
were provided. Subjects were instructed to brush the teeth by using powered toothbrush.
Individual cast models were prepared on alginate impressions. A 2-mm thick film of technical
wax was set on the supra gingival area at buccal and proximal surfaces of study teeth on test
quadrant. The stent were delivered at day 0. Subjects were instructed to wear the stent prior
to the oral hygiene session throughout the experimental gingivitis period to prevent plaque
removal during brushing of the remaining dentition. On Day 42 (T6): After recording of
clinical parameters, oral hygiene instruction and an additional session of supragingival
scaling, as needed, and polishing were given.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05969132 -
Digital Versus Conventional Guided Gingivectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05478317 -
Esthetic Crown Lengthening With Closed Piezoelectric in Comparison to Open Flap Approach
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04219436 -
The Effect of Using Two Different Suturing Techniques on Free Gingival Marginal Stability
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05512312 -
Computer Guided Esthetic Crown Lengthening
|
N/A |