Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity Clinical Trial
Official title:
Success and Survival of e.Max and KHF2 Etched Zirconia Cemented With Resin Cement - a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Verified date | May 2018 |
Source | University of Oslo |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This randomized clinical study aims to compare success and survival of two different ceramic
tooth restoration materials. The hypothesis for the study is that fluoride treated zirconia
will retain as good as lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic when cemented by the same
resin cement.
One group of patients will receive a restoration in fluoride treated zirconia, the other
group will receive a restoration in reinforced glass ceramic. All restorations will be
cemented in the same manner. At 3, 6, 12 and 24 months the participants will be examined.
Status | Enrolling by invitation |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | December 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years or older In the need of treatment on molars or premolars Lives near by Oslo Exclusion Criteria: The patients that does not fulfill the inclusion criteria |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Norway | Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo | Oslo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Oslo | Nordic Institute of Dental Materials |
Norway,
Ruyter EI, Vajeeston N, Knarvang T, Kvam K. A novel etching technique for surface treatment of zirconia ceramics to improve adhesion of resin-based luting cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017 Apr 14;3(1):36-46. doi: 10.1080/23337931.2017.1309658. eCollection 2017 Jan. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Survival | Restoration still retained to tooth | 2 years | |
Primary | Loss of retention | Restoration not retained to tooth | 2 years | |
Secondary | CDA-index: Romeo | Excellent: Surface smooth and glossy, no mismatch in color or shade | 2 years | |
Secondary | CDA-index: Sierra | Acceptable: SRO: Surface slightly rough or pitted, can be polished. SMM: slight mismatch in shade | 2 years | |
Secondary | CDA-index: Tango | Correct: TGI: surface glossy irregular, not subject to correction. TMM: mismatch between restoration and adjacent teeth outside normal range. | 2 years | |
Secondary | CDA-index: Victor | Replace: VSF: surface fractured. VGP: Gross porosities. VSD: shade in gross disharmony | 2 years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03244124 -
Different Application Strategies When Using Futurabond Universal in Class V Cavities
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04630587 -
Longevity of Dental Fillings Utilizing 3D Printing
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03657862 -
Outcomes of Restoring Untreated and SDF-treated Dentine Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth of Preschool Children
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03645551 -
Clinical Longevity of Ceramic Laminate Veneers
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04838483 -
Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03933176 -
Absence of Liner Following the Selective Caries Removal (ALFSCaRe)
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03343184 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06392685 -
Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06456619 -
CAD-CAM or Adhesive Approaches for MIH Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05125900 -
Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Open Sandwich Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03515265 -
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03283280 -
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02572570 -
Clinical Investigation of a New Bulk Fill Composite Resin in the Restoration of Posterior Teeth
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06164418 -
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04293770 -
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06183320 -
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04306549 -
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05551130 -
Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth?
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03924830 -
Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02948686 -
Different Application Strategies When Using Ambar Universal in Class V Cavities
|
N/A |