Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Enrolling by invitation

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03517124
Other study ID # 2016/957
Secondary ID
Status Enrolling by invitation
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 5, 2018
Est. completion date December 2020

Study information

Verified date May 2018
Source University of Oslo
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This randomized clinical study aims to compare success and survival of two different ceramic tooth restoration materials. The hypothesis for the study is that fluoride treated zirconia will retain as good as lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic when cemented by the same resin cement.

One group of patients will receive a restoration in fluoride treated zirconia, the other group will receive a restoration in reinforced glass ceramic. All restorations will be cemented in the same manner. At 3, 6, 12 and 24 months the participants will be examined.


Description:

A randomized controlled clinical study that aims to compare success and survival of potassium hydrogen difluoride (KHF2) etched zirconium dioxide and lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic cemented to molars/premolares using dual cure resin cement.

The null hypothesis for the study is that zirconium dioxide and lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic will retain equally good tooth substance when cemented with resin cement.

Participants are recruited from the student clinic at Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo. Patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria 1) age above 18, 2) require restoration on premolar/molar and 3) are able to come to treatment and recall, are informed about the study and invited to participate. Consent to participation are signed by the patient. At any time and for any reason participants can withdraw from the study.

Personal information will be registered in Service for Sensitive Data, which is a platform to collect, store, analyze and share sensitive data. An encoded research file will be kept separate from the patient journal.The content of this file will be patient journal number and classification of the restoration on a four level scale (Californian Dental Association - CDA) for each recall.

A randomizing tool will be used to decide which ceramic restoration each participant will receive. Treatment will be performed by one clinician. The tooth preparation will be with little retention, and preferably supragingival. For cementing the restorations a standardized protocol for a dual cure resin cement will be used.

Participants only have to pay for the dental technician expenses and will be the same amount regardless of type of ceramic.

Each participant will be examined at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months by a clinician different from the one who performed the treatment. The 4 level CDA classification will be used to characterise each restoration.

Each of the two treatment groups will consist of 20 participants. Significant results will be achieved with the approximate distribution across categories: Category 1: 19,9 %, category 2: 79,4 %, category 3: 4,6 %, category 4: 2,5 %


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Enrolling by invitation
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date December 2020
Est. primary completion date December 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

18 years or older In the need of treatment on molars or premolars Lives near by Oslo

Exclusion Criteria:

The patients that does not fulfill the inclusion criteria

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity

Intervention

Other:
Ceramic tooth restoration
Dental restorations

Locations

Country Name City State
Norway Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo Oslo

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Oslo Nordic Institute of Dental Materials

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Norway, 

References & Publications (1)

Ruyter EI, Vajeeston N, Knarvang T, Kvam K. A novel etching technique for surface treatment of zirconia ceramics to improve adhesion of resin-based luting cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017 Apr 14;3(1):36-46. doi: 10.1080/23337931.2017.1309658. eCollection 2017 Jan. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Survival Restoration still retained to tooth 2 years
Primary Loss of retention Restoration not retained to tooth 2 years
Secondary CDA-index: Romeo Excellent: Surface smooth and glossy, no mismatch in color or shade 2 years
Secondary CDA-index: Sierra Acceptable: SRO: Surface slightly rough or pitted, can be polished. SMM: slight mismatch in shade 2 years
Secondary CDA-index: Tango Correct: TGI: surface glossy irregular, not subject to correction. TMM: mismatch between restoration and adjacent teeth outside normal range. 2 years
Secondary CDA-index: Victor Replace: VSF: surface fractured. VGP: Gross porosities. VSD: shade in gross disharmony 2 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT03244124 - Different Application Strategies When Using Futurabond Universal in Class V Cavities N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04630587 - Longevity of Dental Fillings Utilizing 3D Printing N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03657862 - Outcomes of Restoring Untreated and SDF-treated Dentine Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth of Preschool Children N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03645551 - Clinical Longevity of Ceramic Laminate Veneers
Recruiting NCT04838483 - Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations N/A
Withdrawn NCT03933176 - Absence of Liner Following the Selective Caries Removal (ALFSCaRe) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03343184 - Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System N/A
Completed NCT05125900 - Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Open Sandwich Restorations N/A
Completed NCT03515265 - Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations N/A
Completed NCT03283280 - Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations. N/A
Terminated NCT02572570 - Clinical Investigation of a New Bulk Fill Composite Resin in the Restoration of Posterior Teeth N/A
Recruiting NCT06164418 - Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations N/A
Recruiting NCT04293770 - Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06183320 - Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations N/A
Completed NCT04306549 - Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations N/A
Completed NCT05551130 - Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth? N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03924830 - Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites N/A
Completed NCT02948686 - Different Application Strategies When Using Ambar Universal in Class V Cavities N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06348953 - Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars N/A