Intracranial Artery Occlusion With Infarction (Disorder) Clinical Trial
— ANGEL-ACTOfficial title:
Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic stroke-a Prospective Multicenter Registry Study
Verified date | May 2020 |
Source | Beijing Tiantan Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational [Patient Registry] |
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is effective and safe for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) in major clinical trials. Whether the benefit of EVT in randomized trials could be generalized to clinical practice, especially in developing countries, remains unknown. The prospective Chinese ANGEL-ACT Registry (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke) was established to evaluate the utilization, and subsequent outcomes of EVT treated AIS patients. This study is a multi-center, prospective registry study initiated by researchers, funded by National Key R&D Program of China. A total of 2,000 patients with acute ischemic stroke will undergo endovascular treatment. The hypothesis was that favorable outcomes from clinical trials could be achieved in clinical practice in China.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 2004 |
Est. completion date | July 7, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | July 7, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion criteria 1. Age = 18 years old; 2. Diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke; 3. Imaging confirmed intracranial large artery occlusion (LVO): intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA T/L), middle cerebral artery (MCA M1/M2), anterior cerebral artery (ACA A1/A2), basilar artery (BA), vertebral artery (VA V4), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA P1); 4. Initiation of any type of endovascular treatment (EVT), including intra-arterial thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stenting; 5. The patient or the patient's legal representative is able and willing to sign the informed consent. Exclusion criteria 1. Isolated cervical ICA or VA occlusion; 2. No evidence of LVO on DSA. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Beijing Tiantan Hospital | Beijing | Beijing |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Beijing Tiantan Hospital |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale of 0-2) | The range of modified Rankin Scale was from 0 to 6. 0-No symptoms;1-No significant disability;2-Slight disability;3-Moderate disability;4-Moderately severe disability;5-Severe disability;6 -Dead.A higher score indicates worse a outcome. | 90±7 days after enrollment | |
Primary | Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 12-36 hours after the procedure | Heidelberg Bleeding Classification): new intracranial hemorrhage detected by brain imaging associated with =4 points total National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), =2 points in one NIHSS category, leading to intubation/ hemicraniectomy/ EVD placement or other major medical/surgical intervention, or absence of alternative explanation for deterioration | 12-36 hours after the procedure | |
Primary | Time from symptom onset to recanalization | The end of the procedure | ||
Secondary | Recanalization rate at the end of the procedure | mTICI score 2b-3 | at the end of the procedure | |
Secondary | Recanalization rate after the first attempt | mTICI score 2b-3 | At baseline, during the procedure, after the first attempt of endovascular treatment | |
Secondary | Changes in NIHSS score immediately after the procedure | difference between NIHSS score immediately after the procedure and baseline | within 2 hours after the procedure | |
Secondary | Changes in NIHSS score 24 hours after the procedure | difference between NIHSS score 24 hours after the procedure and baseline | 24 hours after the procedure | |
Secondary | Changes in NIHSS score 7 days after the procedure or at discharge | difference between NIHSS score 7 days after the procedure or discharge and baseline | 7 days after the procedure or discharge | |
Secondary | EQ-5D 90 days after the procedure | EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. Rated level can be coded as a number 1, 2, or 3, which indicates having no problems for 1, having some problems for 2, and having extreme problems for 3. As a result, a person's health status can be defined by a 5-digit number, ranging from 11111 (having no problems in all dimensions) to 33333 (having extreme problems in all dimensions).A higher score indicates a better outcome. | 90±7 days after the procedure | |
Secondary | Barthel index (BI) 90 days after the procedure | The BI has a score of 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. | 90±7 days after the procedure | |
Secondary | Parenchymal hematoma (PH2) | PH2 is defined as hematoma in >30% of infarct area | 12-36 hours after the procedure | |
Secondary | Any intracranial hemorrhage on imaging | 12-36 hours after the procedure | ||
Secondary | All-cause mortality within 90 days | 90±7 days after the procedure | ||
Secondary | Time from onset to arrival | At baseline, after arrival at the hospital | ||
Secondary | Time from arrival to imaging | At baseline, after taking any brain imaging | ||
Secondary | Time from imaging to puncture | At baseline, during the procedure, after successful groin puncture | ||
Secondary | Time from puncture to recanalization | At baseline, during the procedure, after successful recanalization |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04840719 -
RECO in the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04151589 -
Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT): Phase Two
|
N/A |