Cerebral Stroke ,Cerebrovascular Accident, Stroke Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effectiveness of Video Guided Exercise After Stroke
| Verified date | August 2017 |
| Source | University of Leeds |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
People who have had a stroke benefit from opportunities to practice the activities they need
to re-learn. It is common practice to give patients written exercises to guide their practice
out of therapy session. Whilst more practice is better, it is important that the activities
are practiced accurately, to ensure that the right movement patterns are re-learned.
The aim of this study, is to evaluate whether an intervention providing in-patients who have
had a stroke an opportunity to use a simple video guide to help them perform their exercises
accurately would improve clinical outcomes. Watching an activity being performed helps you to
learn the activity more effectively. The focus of this study is arm rehabilitation.
The participants will be adult in-patients in Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and will have
had a first time stroke that has left them with some arm weakness.
The participants will be matched according to the severity of their weakness, then randomly
allocated to either a treatment as usual group, or an intervention group. Those in the
intervention group will have their exercises for their arm and hand recorded onto a tablet
during their normal therapy session. They will then be lent the tablet for the duration of
the trial, so they can have a visual guide to help them throughout the trial period. Ward
staff will be shown how to use the tablet to help any participants who struggle with the
technology.
Measurements will be made before and after the trial period to look at ability to move the
arm and hand, quality of movement, self-efficacy and time spent exercising. Participants and
staff will be asked for their experiences of the intervention or normal practice.
This is a feasibility study with an embedded process evaluation.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 14 |
| Est. completion date | April 30, 2017 |
| Est. primary completion date | April 30, 2017 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 100 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Adults aged 18 or over with capacity to give informed consent (according to the mental capacity act 2005) Clinically diagnosed with a first time stroke (To reduce the impact of previous training and rehabilitation interventions) (Stroke physician, from medical notes) Hospitalised patient, staying on a stroke rehabilitation ward. Moderate or mild unilateral upper limb paresis, with minimal inattention.(Therapist assessment)(Mild MSS15-29, Moderate MSS scale =30 ) Medically stable and physically capable of participating in active rehabilitation (Ward Doctor) Able to understand consent process and communicate such i.e. minimal aphasic symptoms, able to understand English language enough to consent. (Ward therapists with advice from speech and language therapist where appropriate) No previous significant upper limb pathology that may impact on the participants ability to complete activities Discussion with patient and medical notes review) No Hemi-paretic shoulder pain. (Therapist assessment) Signed informed consent to participate in the trial Active rehabilitation goals, and deemed fit and appropriate for rehabilitation by the therapy team. Exclusion Criteria: - Second or more stroke (Stroke physician, from medical notes) Likely to be discharged within two weeks of commencement of trial (It is not always apparent how long someone will remain an in-patient and depends not only on disability, but also social circumstances and patient wishes- therapists judgement for this.(MDT assessment) Age below 18 years Unable to give informed consent. Psychiatric or depressive symptoms that may affect the participants ability to consent or complete the intervention activities(ward Dr) Participation in another clinical trial. Significant apraxia making independent exercise practice difficult (Occupational therapist /physiotherapist judgement) Visual impairment impacting on ability to observe video (Ward team) |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| University of Leeds |
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Motor status score (MSS) | Measures shoulder, elbow wrist hand and finger movements. | 4 weeks | |
| Secondary | Leeds Movement performance Index | Measures quality of movement | 4 weeks | |
| Secondary | Time | Time spent exercising out of therapy | 4 weeks | |
| Secondary | Generalised self efficacy score (GSE) | Measures self - efficacy | 4 weeks |