Rupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Clinical Trial
Official title:
Biomechanical Analysis of Dynamic Tasks and Muscular Strength Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT number | NCT02771548 |
Other study ID # | SSC-ACL-001 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | January 2014 |
Est. completion date | December 2040 |
Background Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common sporting injuries of the knee. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has become one of the most common surgical procedures in an attempt to increase joint stability and facilitate athletes to return to sport (RTS). Although ACLR is considered a relatively successful procedure, dynamic control risk factors and strength and power deficits in the involved limb are still present after patients return to sport. Dynamic multi-plane, multi-joint actions such as jumping, landing, change of direction cutting, have been shown to be common mechanisms of injury for the ACL in field sports . Returning to multidirectional sports requires a proficiency and efficiency of movement when carrying out these tasks. There is a lack of standardized, objective criteria to accurately assess an athlete's ability to safely RTS. Therefore, there is a need for research that simultaneously analyses sport specific dynamic tasks (3D motion analysis) and muscular strength/power deficits that may explain poor outcomes following ACLR. This study aims to further investigate movement patterns, limb asymmetry and muscle strength deficit in patients post-surgery to identify risk factors for re-injury and criteria for RTS. The purpose of this study was to: 1. Analyse kinematic (movement descriptors) and kinetic (forces that cause movement) during sports specific dynamic tasks at different time-points (6 and 9 months) following ACLR. 2. To explore the association of those findings with those who re-injure, those who have persistent knee pain or with those who fail to return to sport. 3. To compare the ACLR participants with age and gender matched healthy multidirectional athletes. It is hypothesised that biomechanical analysis will identify clear risk factors for poor outcomes following ACLR. Analysis of ACLR athletes' biomechanics during sports specific tasks will aid in the identification of athletes who are not yet ready to return to sport and will inform the clinician of what must be targeted in specific rehabilitation protocols before return to sport is considered. Brief protocol Participants will be recruited from patients who are scheduled to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the Sports Surgery Clinic, Ireland. Healthy participants will be recruited from local multidirectional teams. Participation will be voluntary and after obtaining informed consent patients will be asked to complete pre-operative questionnaires to ascertain injury information, and the function of their knee. During surgery the surgeon will fill out an intra-operative questionnaire. Items recorded will include graft type, laxity, involvement of other ligamentous structures, type of femoral and tibial fixation, meniscal or chondral pathology. Biomechanical assessment takes place at 6 and 9 months post surgery for the ACL group while the healthy participants will be tested on one occasion. The 3D testing session will include capturing of jumping, landing, hopping and cutting mechanics through the use of three dimensional motion capture technology and force plates. Here reflective markers are placed on the skin at anatomical landmarks. These markers are picked up by the infrared cameras and tracked at 200 frames per second. Participants will make contact with a force plate with their foot on undertaking the movements. Force and marker data will be combined to calculate joint angles and moments. Participants will also perform a muscle strength test using equipment called an isokinetic dynamometer. Both the operated and non-operated limbs will be tested. Participants will also be asked to fill out validated questionnaires to monitor self reported knee function, their confidence in their knee and also collect data on any continuing adverse symptoms such as locking, giving way, swelling or pain. Participants will also be asked if and when they return to sport. Questionnaires will be administered to participants at pre-op, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 months, 5 and 10 years post operatively.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 1000 |
Est. completion date | December 2040 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2040 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 13 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Active participants - Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery in the Sports Surgery Clinic. - Over the age of 13 years Exclusion Criteria: - Multiple orthopaedic injuries concurrently. - Surgery outside of Sports Surgery Clinic. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Ireland | Sports Surgery Clinic | Dublin | Leinster |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Dr Neil Welch ASCC | Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Insight Centre for Data Analytics, Science Foundation Ireland, Sports Surgery Clinic Research Foundation, University College Cork, University of Leeds, University of Melbourne, University of Roehampton |
Ireland,
Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;27(4):402-16. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270040201. — View Citation
Boden BP, Griffin LY, Garrett WE Jr. Etiology and Prevention of Noncontact ACL Injury. Phys Sportsmed. 2000 Apr;28(4):53-60. doi: 10.3810/psm.2000.04.841. — View Citation
Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, Cook C; International Knee Documentation Committee. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Dec;74(6):594-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.01.036. Epub 2007 Aug 6. — View Citation
Koga H, Nakamae A, Shima Y, Iwasa J, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Mechanisms for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: knee joint kinematics in 10 injury situations from female team handball and basketball. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2218-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546510373570. Epub 2010 Jul 1. — View Citation
Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Mar-Apr;29(2):213-8. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290021601. — View Citation
Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Huang B, Hewett TE. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1968-78. doi: 10.1177/0363546510376053. Epub 2010 Aug 11. — View Citation
Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Feb;9(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Nov 5. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Return to Performance- change in status | The Sports Surgery Clinic return to performance questionnaire asks whether the participant has returned to sport. | 6,9,12 and 24 months post operatively | |
Primary | Injured operated knee- change in status | Participants are asked have they injured their operated knee. | 6,9,12 and 24 months post operatively | |
Primary | Injured their contralateral knee- change in status | Participants are asked have they injured their operated knee. | 6,9,12 and 24 months post operatively | |
Primary | Change in pain experienced | Participants will be asked to rate their pain on a numerical rating scale, 0-10. | 6,9,12 and 24 months post operatively | |
Secondary | Change in Kinetic and kinematic composite score of the lower limb, pelvis and trunk | Associations can be made between post surgical change in biomechanical variables exhibited on sports specific tasks and poor outcomes following ACLR. | At 6 and 9 months post surgery | |
Secondary | Change in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) | The IKDC subjective form is a reliable and valid measure to monitor symptoms and function in daily living activities in those with knee disorders (Higgins et al. 2007). | 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months post surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02524652 -
Local Infiltration Analgesia vs Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02511158 -
French Prospective Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Cohort Study (FAST)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02074917 -
Comparison of Dynamic Knee Stability and Functional Outcomes in Anatomical ACL Reconstruction at AM or Central Position
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02584452 -
Trial Evaluating Postop Pain and Muscle Strength Among Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Ambulatory ACL Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01300182 -
The Effect of Early WBVT on Neuromuscular Control After ACLR
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00971451 -
Quadriceps Function Prior to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02420353 -
Evaluation of rGH Therapy to Prevent Muscle Atrophy in Patients With ACL Tears
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02173483 -
Anterior Cruciate Ligament-reconstruction: Quadriceps Tendon or Hamstrings Tendon? A Prospective Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02754674 -
Comparison of Femoral Tunnel and Clinical Outcome Using Two Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01440348 -
Simultaneous Multiple Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using a Single Achilles Allograft
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01391650 -
Stability of the Knee Joint After Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02834962 -
Study of Single And Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Graft Cross-sectional Dimensions
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02833454 -
Study of the Anatomical Direct Insertion Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02300012 -
A Pilot Study to Investigate Biomarkers in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Patients and Healthy Controls
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02939677 -
Can Targeted Exercise Improve Knee Strength Following ACLR (RATE)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02817399 -
The Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01361789 -
COX-2 Inhibitor Versus Glucocorticoid Versus Both Combined
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00463099 -
Multicenter Orthopaedics Outcomes Network for ACL Reconstructions
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02680821 -
Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) With Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Surgery
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00625885 -
Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS)
|