Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial
— TOPAZOfficial title:
A Long-term Follow-up Study for Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Have Completed the Alemtuzumab Extension Study (CAMMS03409)
| Verified date | March 2022 |
| Source | Sanofi |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
Primary Objective: To evaluate long-term safety of alemtuzumab. Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate long term efficacy of alemtuzumab. - To evaluate the safety profile of participants who received other Disease Modifying Treatment (DMT) following alemtuzumab treatment. - To evaluate participant-reported Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes and health resource utilization of participant who received alemtuzumab. - To evaluate as needed re-treatment with alemtuzumab and other DMTs.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 1062 |
| Est. completion date | July 15, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | July 15, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility | Inclusion criteria: Participant had completed at least 48 months of the Extension Study CAMMS03409. Signed written informed consent form. Exclusion criteria: Participant participating in another investigational interventional study. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argentina | Investigational Site Number 03208 | Caba | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2013 | Auchenflower | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2001 | Heidelberg | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2011 | Hobart | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2012 | Kogarah | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2003 | Melbourne | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2002 | Parkville | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2005 | Southport | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2009 | Sydney | |
| Australia | Investigational Site Number 2006 | Westmead | |
| Belgium | Investigational Site Number 5005 | Bruxelles | |
| Belgium | Investigational Site Number 5004 | Esneux | |
| Belgium | Investigational Site Number 5001 | Leuven | |
| Brazil | Investigational Site Number 3006 | Porto Alegre | |
| Brazil | Investigational Site Number 3002 | Recife | |
| Brazil | Investigational Site Number 3001 | São Paulo | |
| Brazil | Investigational Site Number 3003 | São Paulo | |
| Canada | Investigational Site Number 1102 | Calgary | |
| Canada | Investigational Site Number 1105 | Gatineau | |
| Canada | Investigational Site Number 1104 | Greenfield Park | |
| Canada | Investigational Site Number 1109 | Kingston | |
| Canada | Investigational Site Number 1110 | London | |
| Canada | Investigational Site Number 1101 | Ottawa | |
| Canada | Investigational Site Number 1106 | Vancouver | |
| Czechia | Investigational Site Number 4803 | Brno | |
| Czechia | Investigational Site Number 4804 | Hradec Kralove | |
| Czechia | Investigational Site Number 4801 | Praha 2 | |
| Czechia | Investigational Site Number 4802 | Teplice | |
| Denmark | Investigational Site Number 5302 | Aarhus N | |
| Denmark | Investigational Site Number 5301 | København Ø. | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4602 | Berlin | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4607 | Dresden | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4634 | Frankfurt am Main | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4622 | Hamburg | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4605 | Hannover | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4609 | Hennigsdorf | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4608 | München | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4610 | Rostock | |
| Germany | Investigational Site Number 4613 | Wermsdorf | |
| Israel | Investigational Site Number 5501 | Ramat Gan | |
| Israel | Investigational Site Number 5505 | Tel Aviv | |
| Italy | Investigational Site Number 4112 | Cagliari | |
| Italy | Investigational Site Number 4102 | Gallarate (VA) | |
| Italy | Investigational Site Number 4106 | Orbassano (TO) | |
| Italy | Investigational Site Number 4110 | Roma | |
| Mexico | Investigational Site Number 3105 | Chihuahua | |
| Mexico | Investigational Site Number 3102 | Mexico | |
| Netherlands | Investigational Site Number 4202 | Sittard-Geleen | |
| Poland | Investigational Site Number 4902 | Krakow | |
| Poland | Investigational Site Number 4901 | Lodz | |
| Poland | Investigational Site Number 4903 | Lublin | |
| Poland | Investigational Site Number 4904 | Poznan | |
| Poland | Investigational Site Number 4905 | Warszawa | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6009 | Kazan | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6001 | Moscow | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6003 | Moscow | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6005 | Moscow | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6006 | Nizhny Novgorod | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6010 | Pyatigorsk | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6002 | Saint-Petersburg | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6004 | Saint-Petersburg | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6008 | Saint-Petersburg | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6013 | Samara | |
| Russian Federation | Investigational Site Number 6016 | Ufa | |
| Spain | Investigational Site Number 4301 | Barcelona | |
| Spain | Investigational Site Number 4303 | Madrid | |
| Spain | Investigational Site Number 4305 | Málaga | |
| Spain | Investigational Site Number 4304 | Sevilla | |
| Sweden | Investigational Site Number 4701 | Göteborg | |
| Sweden | Investigational Site Number 4702 | Umeå | |
| Ukraine | Investigational Site Number 6102 | Kharkov | |
| Ukraine | Investigational Site Number 6104 | Kiev | |
| Ukraine | Investigational Site Number 6103 | Lviv | |
| United Kingdom | Investigational Site Number 4004 | Bristol | |
| United Kingdom | Investigational Site Number 4001 | Cambridge | |
| United Kingdom | Investigational Site Number 4005 | Cardiff | |
| United Kingdom | Investigational Site Number 4006 | London | |
| United Kingdom | Investigational Site Number 4008 | Salford | |
| United Kingdom | Investigational Site Number 4007 | Sheffield | |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1014 | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1097 | Allentown | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1025 | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1040 | Berkeley | California |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1095 | Chapel Hill | North Carolina |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1035 | Cleveland | Ohio |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1163 | Cordova | Tennessee |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1086 | Cullman | Alabama |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1017 | Des Moines | Iowa |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1020 | Detroit | Michigan |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1027 | Fort Collins | Colorado |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1001 | Fort Wayne | Indiana |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1055 | Franklin | Tennessee |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1152 | Fullerton | California |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1018 | Houston | Texas |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1024 | Indianapolis | Indiana |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1078 | Jacksonville | Florida |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1022 | Kansas City | Kansas |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1084 | Kansas City | Missouri |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1009 | Knoxville | Tennessee |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1083 | Lenexa | Kansas |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1039 | Lexington | Kentucky |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1021 | Louisville | Kentucky |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1059 | Maitland | Florida |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1081 | Mineola | New York |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1042 | Nashville | Tennessee |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1026 | New York | New York |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1008 | Northbrook | Illinois |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1067 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1093 | Pasadena | California |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1160 | Patchogue | New York |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1031 | Phoenix | Arizona |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1171 | Phoenix | Arizona |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1057 | Providence | Rhode Island |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1015 | Rochester | New York |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1002 | Round Rock | Texas |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1092 | Saint Louis | Missouri |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1046 | San Antonio | Texas |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1173 | Sarasota | Florida |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1068 | Seattle | Washington |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1034 | Sunrise | Florida |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1053 | Syracuse | New York |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1005 | Tampa | Florida |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1049 | Tampa | Florida |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1073 | Teaneck | New Jersey |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1054 | Traverse City | Michigan |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1090 | Tucson | Arizona |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1058 | Uniontown | Ohio |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1037 | Vienna | Virginia |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1061 | Wellesley | Massachusetts |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1082 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
| United States | Investigational Site Number 1028 | Worcester | Massachusetts |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Genzyme, a Sanofi Company |
United States, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | An Adverse Event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily had to have causal relationship with treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment period (time from Baseline until the end of the study LPS13649 [i.e. up to a maximum of 5.6 years]). Serious adverse events (SAEs) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. | From Baseline until the end of the study (up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years) | |
| Primary | Number of Participants With Infusion-Associated Reactions (IAR) | Infusion-associated reactions (IAR) was defined as any adverse event occurring during and within 24 hours of alemtuzumab infusion. | Within 24 hours of any alemtuzumab infusion | |
| Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Adverse events of special interest included the following: hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis; pregnancy of a woman entered in the study; symptomatic overdose (serious or non-serious) with investigational medicinal Product (IMP); increase in alanine transaminase (ALT); autoimmune mediated conditions; hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; temporally associated AEs; serious infections; malignancy; and pneumonitis. | From Baseline until the end of the study (up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years) | |
| Primary | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Criteria for potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities included:
Hemoglobin (Hb): less than or equal to (<=)115 grams per liter (g/L)(Male [M]), <= 95 g/L (Female[ F]); greater than or equal to (>=)185 g/L (M), >= 165 g/L (F); Decrease From Baseline (DFB) >= 20 g/L. Hematocrit: <= 0.37 volume/volume (v/v) (M); <= 0.32 v/v (F); >= 0.55 v/v (M); >= 0.5 v/v (F). Red Blood Cells (RBCs): >=6 *10^12/L. Platelets: <100 *10^9/L; >=700 *10^9/L. As pre-specified, data collection and analysis for this outcome measure was done on the overall population along with 2 subgroups (DAT and IAT). |
From Baseline until the end of the study (up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years) | |
| Secondary | Annualized Relapse Rate | Relapse was defined as new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination. Annualized relapse rate was obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment follow up time of all participants divided by the total years of follow-up for all participants. The annualized relapse rate was estimated using a negative binomial model with robust variance estimation. | Up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years | |
| Secondary | Proportion of Participants Who Were Relapse Free | Relapse was defined as new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination. The proportion of participants who were relapse free (without event) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 | EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS). It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral, and other). EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicated worst outcomes. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 | |
| Secondary | Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) Lesions Per MRI Scan | Number of Gd-enhancing lesions per scan was defined as the total number of Gd-enhancing lesions that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during the treatment period. The adjusted cumulative count of lesions was estimated by a repeated negative binomial regression with generalized estimating equation (GEE) adjusted for analysis groups and geographic region as covariates. | Up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years | |
| Secondary | Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per MRI Scan | Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions per scan was defined as the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesion that occurred during treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during treatment period. The adjusted cumulative count of lesions was estimated by a repeated negative binomial regression with GEE adjusted for analysis groups and geographic region as covariates. | Up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years | |
| Secondary | Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of New T1 (and New Hypointense T1) Lesions Per MRI Scan | Number of new T1 lesions per scan was defined as the total number of new T1 lesion (and New Hypointense T1) that occurred during treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during treatment period.The adjusted cumulative count of lesions was estimated by a repeated negative binomial regression with GEE adjusted for analysis groups and geographic region as covariates. | Up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years | |
| Secondary | Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Percent Change From Baseline in Volume of T1 Lesions at Months 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The total lesion volume (T1 lesions) was measured by MRI scan. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Percent Change From Baseline in Volume of T2 Lesions at Months 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The total lesion volume (T2 lesions) was measured by MRI scan. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Parenchymal Fraction (BPF) at Month 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The brain parenchymal fraction was measured by MRI scan. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Self-reported Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at Month 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The MOS SF-36 is an extensively validated and widely used measure of QoL that assesses participants' perceptions of health status and its impact on their lives. It consisted of 36 items organized into 8 scales (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health). Two summary measures of physical and mental health, the PCS and MCS, respectively, were derived from scale aggregates, and were reported in this outcome measure. The score range for each of these 2 summary scores was from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), higher scores indicated better QoL. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) Score at Month 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The FAMS is a self-reported multidimensional index comprising a total of 58 items on 7 subscales: mobility (7 items); symptoms (7 items); emotional well-being (7 items); general contentment (7 items); thinking and fatigue (9 items); family/social well-being (7 items); and additional concerns (14 items, these are not scored). Each item (except those for "additional concerns") was rated on a 5-point scale of 0 (lower quality of life) to 4 (higher quality of life). Total FAMS score was the sum of 44 scored items, which ranged from 0 (poor) to 176 (best), with higher numbers reflecting a higher quality of life. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Score: Utility Scores at Month 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The EQ-5D is a generic, standardized instrument that provides a simple, descriptive profile and a single index value for health status used in the clinical and economic evaluation of health care as well as in population health surveys. The EQ-5D comprises 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension measured on 3 levels: some, moderate, and extreme problems. The 5 dimensional 3-level systems was converted into single index utility score ranges from 0 to 100, where 100=best health state; and 0=worst health state; higher scores indicated better outcome. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Month 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0 to 100), where 0=worst imaginable health state to 100=best imaginable health state, and higher score indicated better outcome. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Modified Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ): Number of Participants Who Reported Change in Employment Situation, Availing of Sick Leaves, Admissions and Stays in Hospital, Rehabilitation Centers or Nursing Homes Due to Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRUQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. Questionnaire addresses the following content areas: employment situation and changes in employment situation due to MS;sick leaves,admissions and stays in hospital, rehabilitation centers, or nursing homes; typical MS-related investments (eg, stair and bed lift, ramps,rails) and devices (eg,walking aids,wheelchairs); assistance by community or social services (e.g. home nurse, transportation), or help from family or friends. Each question requires a binary answer (yes/no). Number of participants who reported "Yes" as an answer to "employment situation change; had sick leaves; had hospital admission; had spent time in rehabilitation center and had spent time in a nursing home or a similar institution" questions were reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Modified HRUQ: Number of Participants Who Reported Other Changes/Changes in Lifestyle Due to Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRUQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS.Questionnaire addresses following content areas: employment situation and changes in employment situation due to MS; admissions and stays in hospital, rehabilitation centers, or nursing homes; typical MS-related investments(e.g.stair and bed lift,ramps,rails) and devices(e.g.walking aids,wheelchairs);assistance by community or social services(e.g.home nurse, transportation), or help from family or friends. Each question requires a binary answer (yes/no). Number of participants who reported other changes/changes in lifestyle due to MS, i.e."Yes" as an answer to "had made changes to your house, apartment, car or did you require any special equipment or aids; assistance required; other assistance required" questions were reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Participants Reporting Current Employment Status (Part Time/Full Time/Not Employed) Due to Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRPQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. The questionnaire addresses the following content area: participant reported data regarding employment status, work productivity, impact on household chores due to MS. Current employment status of participants (i.e. Part Time/Full Time/Not Employed) was reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | HRPQ: Total Scheduled Working Hours and Number of Hours Missed From Work Due to Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRPQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. The questionnaire addresses the following content area: participant reported data regarding employment status, work productivity, impact on household chores due to MS. Data for "total scheduled working hours of participants; number of hours missed from work by participants due to MS" were reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | HRPQ: Percentage Impact on Work Output Due to Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRPQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. The questionnaire addresses the following content area: participant reported data regarding employment status, work productivity, impact on household chores due to MS. Percentage impact on work output due to MS were reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | HRPQ: Total Scheduled Household Chores Hours; Number of Hours Missed From Household Chores Due to Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRPQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. The questionnaire addresses the following content area: participant reported data regarding employment status, work productivity, impact on household chores due to MS. Data for "total scheduled household chores hours; number of hours missed from planned household chores by participants due to MS" were reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | HRPQ: Percentage Impact on Work Output for Household Chores Due to Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRPQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. The questionnaire addresses the following content area: participant reported data regarding employment status, work productivity, impact on household chores due to MS. Percentage impact on work output for household chores due to MS were reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline (Month 0 of LPS13649), Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60 | |
| Secondary | HRPQ: Duration of Disease (in Months) Since Development of Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRPQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. The questionnaire addresses the following content area: participant reported data regarding employment status, work productivity, impact on household chores due to MS. Mean and standard deviation data for duration of MS disease (in months) since the start of MS development in participants was reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline up to end of the study (up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years) | |
| Secondary | HRPQ: Number of Participants Who Reported Impact on Work Due to Multiple Sclerosis | Participants use of healthcare resources, non-medical resources, and informal care as well as their work capacity was assessed at scheduled study visits using a modified questionnaire (HRPQ) designed to evaluate the economic impact of MS. The questionnaire addresses the following content area: participant reported data regarding employment status, work productivity, impact on household chores due to MS. Number of participants who reported "Yes" as an answer to questions related to impact on work: "forced me to work part-time when I wanted to work full-time; kept me from having a job when I wanted to work full-time; kept me from having a job when I wanted to work part-time; none of the above" questions were reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline up to end of the study (up to a maximum duration of 5.6 years) |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT01945359 -
Pilot Study to Assess Disease Stability in a Natalizumab to Dimethyl Fumarate Crossover Design
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01456416 -
Glatiramer Acetate for Multiple Sclerosis With Autoimmune Comorbidities
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT01450124 -
Safety, Tolerability And Mechanism Of Action Of Boswellic Acids (BA) In Multiple Sclerosis (SABA)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05277740 -
Implementation of a Novel Functional Eye-Tracking Biomarker for Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03718247 -
Utilization of the Ketogenic Diet in Patient With Relapsing Remitting MS
|
||
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03471338 -
Neuropsychological Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Benefits of a Computerised Semi-autonomous At-home Cognitive Rehabilitation Programme
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03004079 -
Clinical Importance of Glucose Regulation in Relapsing MS
|
||
| Terminated |
NCT02266121 -
Improving Cognitive Aptitudes With tDCS in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01963611 -
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Plovamer Acetate (Pathway 1)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT01464905 -
Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of NU100 in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT01225289 -
Impact of Vitamin A Supplementation on Immune System in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT00242268 -
A Safety Study of Combination Treatment With Avonex and Zocor in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT00203086 -
A Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Effectiveness of Novantrone Therapy Followed by Copaxone Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT00616187 -
Atorvastatin in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06083753 -
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PIPE-307 in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04602390 -
Assessment of ANK-700 in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06159712 -
Comparative Study of High-Efficacy Disease Modifying Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04604041 -
Investigation of Subclinical Markers of Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
| Terminated |
NCT03536559 -
Nanocrystalline Gold to Treat Remyelination Failure in Chronic Optic Neuropathy In Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT02490982 -
Teriflunomide Observational Effectiveness Study
|