Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT01259765 |
| Other study ID # |
2004-009 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
Phase 2
|
| First received |
December 13, 2010 |
| Last updated |
August 8, 2011 |
| Start date |
January 2006 |
| Est. completion date |
November 2009 |
Study information
| Verified date |
February 2006 |
| Source |
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
Bangladesh: Ethical Review Committee |
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The investigators hypothesize that :
oral administration of VHH batch 203027 will be
- safe and tolerable for healthy Bangladeshi humans of all age groups (Part I)
- effective in reducing severity of diarrhoea in children with proven rotavirus infection
(Part II). This entry only covers Part II.
Description:
Brief Summary Study investigating the efficacy of oral administration of VHH antibody
fragment derived from antibodies as found in milk of llamas and camels via a prototype food
product in reducing the severity of rotavirus diarrhoea in children.
Detailed Description
Introduction Rotavirus is the leading viral enteropathogen, which is responsible for 11-71%
of all diarrhoea episodes in infants and children worldwide. In developing countries,
rotavirus is associated with more than 125 million episodes of diarrhoea each year (Cook et
al. 1990), leading to an estimated 600,000 deaths. It is responsible for 60% of all
diarrhoeal episodes, 20-60% of diarrhoeal hospitalizations, and 20% of diarrhoea-related
deaths in children <5 years of age (Perez-Schael et al. 1997). In the United States of
America alone, rotavirus is associated with 3% of all hospitalizations of children younger
than 5 years with medical and indirect costs of over US$ 1 billion each year (Glass et al.
1991). In many localities deaths from rotavirus infections persist despite national programs
to encourage the use of oral rehydration therapy.
Current management of rotavirus gastroenteritis Current management of rotavirus diarrhoea
includes prevention of dehydration, or management of dehydration using oral or intravenous
rehydration, as appropriate, and continued feeding. Early resumption of normal feeding is
encouraged to enhance mucosal repair and to minimize nutritional consequences of infection.
The children of developing countries might benefit from zinc supplementation, but its mode
of delivery and cost effectiveness are yet to be decided in rotavirus diarrhoea. No specific
treatment is currently available to reduce the duration or severity of this illness.
Therefore, rotavirus-induced diarrhoea, which is considered to be a self-limited disease, is
responsible for significant childhood deaths in the developing countries (Glass et al.
1996).
Active immunization against rotavirus infection The development, testing and eventual use of
an effective, safe and inexpensive rotavirus vaccine would be the most efficient method for
preventing severe disease and deaths in developing countries. Rapid progress has been made,
and several candidate rotavirus vaccines have been developed and tested. Two rotavirus
vaccines, Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Belgium) and RotaTeq (Merck & Co., USA) have
recently entered the market in the developed world. Both vaccines appear to be safe with
respect to intussusception, and are highly efficacious in preventing severe gastroenteritis
due to rotavirus strains carrying predominantly serotype G1 (Cunliffe & Nakagomi 2005).
Confirmation of the safety and efficacy of both vaccines in developing countries is still
needed. Moreover, assessment of the ability of each vaccine to provide protection against
increasingly diverse population of rotavirus strains will depend on continuous surveillance
on the strain and development of newer vaccines as newer serotypes predominate in different
geographical locations, which may not be easy for the developing countries. There thus is a
clear need to define improved, cost effective interventions in the management of rotavirus
diarrhoea until the time an effective, safe and inexpensive vaccine, affordable to the
developing countries, is available.
Passive immunisation for rotavirus-induced diarrhoea; There are good reasons to hypothesize
that passive immunisation could be useful in the management of human rotavirus diarrhoea.
For example, oral administration of rotavirus-neutralizing antibodies has been found to
modulate the rotavirus-induced diarrhoea in children. Beneficial prophylactic (Barnes et al.
1982) and therapeutic effects (Guarino et al. 1991), in terms of reduction of duration and
severity of rotavirus diarrhoea, have also been observed in association with orally
administered human IgG preparations. The use of human antibody preparation, however, is
limited due to the risk of viral contamination and high production and supply chain costs of
such product(s) and very low bio-availability.
An alternative source of antibodies, safe and easy to produce, was later developed in hyper
immunized bovine colostrums by vaccinating pregnant cows against human strains of rotavirus.
This approach has also been effectively used for prophylactic (Davidsson et al. 1989) and
therapeutic benefits (Mitra et al. 1995, Sarker et al. 1998) in rotavirus diarrhoea in
hospitalized children. In a recently concluded study in children with rotavirus diarrhoea in
Bangladesh, we have observed a modest benefit from oral administration of immunoglobulin
extracted from eggs of chicken immunized with human strains of rotavirus (Sarker et al.
2001).
Passive immunization for prevention or treatment of enteric infections generally requires
relatively large amounts of antibody, particularly at the mucosal sites where antibodies are
rapidly cleared. Therefore, these modalities, although proven to be effective, become
expensive due to requirement of larger doses of antibodies. The other limitations of the
conventional IgG antibodies include their poor stability and complex nature that limits
their large-scale production. A promising solution for these problems in large-scale
antibody production came, rather unexpectedly, from the nature itself- camels and llama
posses an unusual type of IgG antibodies (IgG2 and IgG3) that are devoid of light chains-
the "heavy chain" antibodies.
Selection of heavy chain antibody fragments In llama and camel, the "heavy chain" IgG
antibodies co-exist with the "conventional" IgG (IgG1) (Hamers-Casterman et al. 1993). In
contrast to conventional antibodies, the heavy chain antibodies are devoid of the light
chains. Therefore, the binding domain of the heavy chain antibodies consists only of the
variable domain of the heavy chain (VHH) in contrast to the binding domain of the
conventional antibodies which consists of a variable domain of the heavy chain (VH) and one
of the light chain (VL). The biochemical properties of llama VHH antibody fragments are
superior to the Fv fragments (VH + VL) of conventional IgG antibodies. Although the VHH
antibody fragments have a simple antigen binding structure with only one domain, it
possesses high affinity, and is extremely thermostable (van der Linden et al., 1999).
Furthermore, they are well expressed and secreted by the bakers yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, allowing for a large-scale cost effective production (Frenken et al., 2000).
This process will make the VHH fragments an affordable ingredient for food products and will
widen their availability to the general population of developing countries.
VHH as a potential food ingredient Many people in African/Arabic countries regularly consume
camel milk. In 1992, it was observed that camel milk contains high titres of antibodies
against rotavirus (el Agamy et al 1992).The antibody fragment in VHH batch 203027 is a
fragment of those antibodies assumed to be present in camel/llama milk. Thus, the
investigational product can be classified as a food ingredient As from its start in 1999,
the aim of Unilever's "VHH" project was to develop an affordable food for developing
countries, which "may help in reducing the risk for rotavirus infections". This type of
claim fits very well into the definitions put forward by the European Union-sponsored
Concerted Action on Functional Foods Science in Europe (FUFOSE) (Diplock et al 1999). The
FUFOSE terminology's for 'enhanced function' (type A) and 'reduction of risk of disease'
(type B) claims are now widely adapted by many national and international codes of practice,
including Codex Alimentarius. It was especially developed in the 1990's to allow the
delineation between functional foods from drugs. In this context, we would also like to
refer to the EC Regulation No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27
January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients and the EU regulation
1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made for foods. The efficacy of VHH fragments in
reducing the risk for developing rotavirus diarrhoea when supplied in a food format will be
tested in an additional trial Safety of application of VHH antibody fragment Safety of oral
application of VHH antibody fragment has been proven in two studies executed in the
Netherlands and Bangladesh, including adult and children above the age of 6 months.
Comparison:
We will compare with the effect of VHH antibody fragment against placebo in children with
proven rotavirus diarrhoea hospitalized at the ICDDR,B. This intervention will be on top of
the standard treatment, including oral rehydration treatment.
