Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03866330
Other study ID # 001/LIFE/2019
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 1/Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2019
Est. completion date March 1, 2022

Study information

Verified date March 2019
Source Medical University of Warsaw
Contact Marek Postula, MD, PhD
Phone +48605113346
Email mpostula@wum.edu.pl
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This phase I/II study will enroll 100 subjects with mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the hip/knee/ glenohumeral joint will be enrolled according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects will receive every three months a single dose of at least 10 million of Wharton Jelly derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (WJMSC) form the Polish Stem Cell Bank for 12 months (maximum four doses in total and at least 40 million of WJMSC in total) via ultrasound guided intra-articular injection.


Description:

This phase I/II study will enroll 100 subjects with mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the hip/knee/ glenohumeral joint will be enrolled according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients are selected and sign consent forms, then divided into 3 groups based on clinical presentation. Subjects will receive a single dose of at least 10 million of Wharton Jelly derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (WJMSC) prepared by the Polish Stem Cell Bank every three months for 12 months (maximum four doses in total and at least 40 million of WJMSC in total) via ultrasound guided intra-articular injection. During the study period and 24 months after last injection they will be followed by clinical assessment, laboratory investigations including inflammatory markers and microRNA, as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the injected joint. The investigators will also determine the local and systemic safety of the procedure and therapy with WJMSC.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date March 1, 2022
Est. primary completion date December 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 30 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- presence of osteoarthritis of the knee, hip or glenohumeral joint,

- confirmation cartilage injury, articular cartilage part or full-thickness injury by MR (Magnetic Resonance),

- joint pain of VAS (visual analog scale score) is 1 or higher while resting, 2 and higher during any physical activity,

- loss of joint function based on scale specific for certain joints; for hip: HHS scale (Harris Hip Score), HOOS scale (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC); for knee: modified HHS score (Harris Hip Score), The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC Questionnaire) and KOOS scale (Osteoarthritis Outcome Score); glenohumeral joint: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH], CONSTANT score,

- clinical indication for surgical intervention,

- no effect of pharmacotherapy according to The World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder lasting at least 6 months,

- no effect of physical rehabilitation lasting at least 6 months,

- willing to participate understand and sign the consent form of this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- active inflammatory disease or infection,

- skin disease/infection around joint,

- severe heart failure,

- anemia,

- active/history of human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV), the hepatitis B virus (HBV) or the hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection,

- pregnant or breast-feeding women,

- mental disease, addiction to drugs or alcohol,

- participate other clinical experiments in 6 months,

- refuse to sign the consent form, or cannot keep follow-up visit.

Study Design


Intervention

Biological:
Intraarticular injection of WJMSC
ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of at least 10 million of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells per procedure

Locations

Country Name City State
Poland Life Clinic Warsaw Mazovian

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Medical University of Warsaw

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Poland, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE (HOOS) Change in HOOS score. HOOS consists of 5 subscales: pain, other symptoms, function in activities of daily living (ADL), and function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec), and hip-related quality of life (QOL). In total, 40 items: 10 items for pain, 5 items for other symptoms (3 for symptoms and 2 for stiff- ness), 17 items for function in ADL, 4 items for function in Sport/Rec, and 4 items for hip-related QOL. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is scored from 0 to 4. Scores are summarized for each subscale and trans- formed to a 0-100 scale (0 indicating extreme problems and 100 indicating no problems). Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)]
Primary Harris Hip Score Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS) The domains covered are pain, function, absence of deformity, and range of motion. The pain domain measures pain severity and its effect on activities and need for pain medication. The function domain consists of daily activities (stair use, using public transportation, sitting, and managing shoes and socks) and gait (limp, support needed, and walking distance). Deformity takes into account hip flexion, adduction, internal rotation, and extremity length discrepancy. Range of motion measures hip flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation, and adduction. There are 10 items. The score has a maximum of 100 points (best possible outcome) covering pain (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), absence of deformity (1 item, 4 points), and range of motion (2 items, 5 points). Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)]
Primary Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Change in KOOS score
It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL)
The five patient-relevant subscales of KOOS are scored separately: Pain (nine items); Symptoms (seven items); ADL Function (17 items); Sport and Recreation Function (five items); Quality of Life (four items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems). Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopaedic assessment scales and generic measures.
Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)]
Primary modified Harris Hip Score for knee Change in modified Harris Hip Score (HHS) The domains covered are pain, function, absence of deformity, and range of motion. The pain domain measures pain severity and its effect on activities and need for pain medication. The function domain consists of daily activities (stair use, using public transportation, sitting, and managing shoes and socks) and gait (limp, support needed, and walking distance). Deformity takes into account hip flexion, adduction, internal rotation, and extremity length discrepancy. Range of motion measures hip flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation, and adduction. There are 10 items. The score has a maximum of 100 points (best possible outcome) covering pain (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), absence of deformity (1 item, 4 points), and range of motion (2 items, 5 points). Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)]
Primary The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC Questionnaire) Change in IKDC Questionnaire score
The questionnaire looks at 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function. The symptoms subscale helps to evaluate things such as pain, stiffness, swelling and giving-way of the knee.
Scores are obtained by summing the individual items, then transforming the crude total to a scaled number that ranges from 0 to 100. This final number is interpreted as a measure of function with higher scores representing higher levels of function
The transformed score is interpreted as a measure of function such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms. A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms.
Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)]
Primary WOMAC (for hip and knee) Change in WOMAC score. WOMAC score is used to assess patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee using 24 parameters in 5 categories.
1 Pain 2.Stiffness 3.Physical function 4.Social function 5. Emotional function
Scoring and Interpretation
Response : points none - 0 slight 1 moderate 2 severe 3 extreme 4
score = = summary (points for relevant items) average score = = (total score) / (number of items) Interpretation: minimum total score: 0 maximum total score: 96 minimum pain subscore: 0 maximum pain subscore: 20 minimum stiffness subscore: 0 maximum stiffness subscore: 8 minimum physical function subscore: 0 maximum physical function subscore: 6
Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
Primary Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] Change in DASH score
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure is a 30-item. The items enquire about the degree of difficulty in performing different physical activities because of arm, shoulder and hand problems (21 items), the severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness and stiffness (five items) and the impact of the problem on social functioning, work, sleep and self-image (four items).
The scores are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability
A minimum score is 30; a maximum is 150. The range of the scores, therefore—from 30 to 150—equals 120. The raw score is then transformed to a zero-to-100 scale with zero reflecting no disability (good function) and 100 reflecting maximum disability.
Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
Primary The Constant-Murley score (CMS) Change in CMS. The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient
The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function
Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
Primary Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain in the target hip following completion of treatment cycles. Visual analogue scales (VAS) are psychometric measuring instruments designed to document the characteristics of disease-related symptom severity in individual patients and use this to achieve a rapid (statistically measurable and reproducible) classification of symptom severity and disease control The VAS is a commonly used tool in health outcome studies, when using it to assess importance of certain action or intervention, how we can interpret the results, on 1 to 10 line (where 1; the least and the 10; the highest), Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
Secondary 1. Nature, incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) Defined as any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal findings, or diseases that emerge or worsen relative to baseline (i.e., if present upon study entry) during the study regardless of causal relationship.
Methods i. Spontaneous subject reports ii. Subject interview by study personnel iii. Clinical examination during face-to-face clinic follow-ups. Defined as any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal findings, or diseases that emerge or worsen relative to baseline (i.e., if present upon study entry) during the study regardless of causal relationship.
Methods i. Spontaneous subject reports ii. Subject interview by study personnel iii. Clinical examination during face-to-face clinic follow-ups
Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
Secondary 2. Change in radiographic/magnetic resonance joint morphology Change in radiographic/magnetic resonance joint morphology Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
Secondary 3. Change in cartilage thickness Cartilage thickness on MRI Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
Secondary 4. Change in cartilage volume Cartilage volume on MRI Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
Secondary 5. Change in cartilage morphology Cartilage morphology on MRI Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
Secondary 6. Change in subchondral bone morphology Subchondral bone morphology (i.e. edema) on MRI Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
Secondary 8. Inflammation monitoring Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle based on changes of concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1ß (pg/ml), IL-6 (pg/ml), IL-8 (pg/ml), IL-11 (pg/ml), CD40L (ng/ml), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha (pg/ml), high-sensivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (mg/dl) and miRNA expression (ug/dl) defined on microarray profilling. Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle]
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04657926 - A Trial of APPA in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT02536833 - A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects Phase 2
Completed NCT03014037 - Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration N/A
Recruiting NCT05937542 - A Qualitative Investigation of CLEAT Participants
Completed NCT03644615 - A Mindfulness Program (MBSR) in the Management of Symptomatic Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT06061367 - Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
Withdrawn NCT04976972 - A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation N/A
Completed NCT05496205 - A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT03850665 - Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach N/A
Completed NCT02826902 - Effect of Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Correctional Tibial Osteotomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT04402502 - Dynamic 4DCT to Examine Wrist Carpal Mechanics N/A
Completed NCT02923700 - Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT04564053 - Study of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LNA043 in Japanese Osteoarthritis Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT05070871 - A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05036174 - Diphenhydramine Ointment for Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT02912429 - Onlay vs. Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT02666443 - Low Dose Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Blocks N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02723929 - Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee
Withdrawn NCT02921594 - Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties N/A
Terminated NCT02820766 - Journey II BCS CMS Total Knee System Compared to Other PS Total Knee Systems in PT Setting N/A