View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis.
Filter by:Total knee replacement (TKR) is accepted as treatment of choice for end stage gonarthrosis. It is performed cemented or cementless and although cemented implants were shown to decrease bone density more than cementless fixations there is no evidence-based difference between them in the literature. As far as the investigators are concerned, the effect of cementation on patients' joint perception has never been studied so far.
The goal of the interventional study is to assess the effectiveness of the supporting properties and safety of the dietary supplement ARTNEO (ARTNEO®), capsules with an average weight of 585 mg, in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint of both sexes aged 40 to 75 years. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of the supporting properties of dietary supplement ARTNEO (ARTNEO®) in patients with knee osteoarthritis in comparison with active control; 2. To evaluate the safety of the dietary supplement ARTNEO (ARTNEO®) in patients with knee osteoarthritis
This study will explore the effectiveness of intra-articular knee injections in patients with osteoarthritis by comparing Corticosteroid (triamcinolone) vs Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP). This study is a randomized controlled trial with a sample size of one hundred and sixty patients (160). Patients would be recruited via new referrals and follow-up appointments in the Orthopaedic clinic at the UHWI (University Hospital of the West Indies) with knee osteoarthritis. The aim of the study is to: 1. To determine if platelet-rich plasma injections are better at improving functional outcomes in the knee using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) when compared to intraarticular steroids. 2. To identify adverse reactions related to these injections
Osteoarthritis is a continual illness of joints. We aim to investigate the effect of Nigella sativa oil in comparison with placebo on the reduction of osteoarthritis pain. This study is a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial study, conducting in Vali-e-Asr Hospital in 2019, in Birjand, on patients with mild osteoarthritis. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index is applied to score the functional status of participants' joints.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of heparin-conjugated gel for treating ankle joint cartilage lesions compared to the conventional microfracture method. It involves 40 participants aged 18 to 65 with localized cartilage defects (Outerbridge II-IV) in the ankle's talus bone. Participants will be divided into two groups: the main group and the control group. The main group will undergo a two-stage process. Initially, adipose tissue will be collected via lipoaspiration from osteoarthritis patients. This tissue will be used to isolate mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and extract growth factors, resulting in a biocomposite hydrogel. In the second stage, arthroscopy will be performed to apply the hydrogel for cartilage treatment. The control group will undergo standard microfracture surgery, a known cartilage repair method. The study's main objective is to compare heparin-conjugated gel treatment to microfracture in terms of cartilage repair and patient outcomes. A 12-month follow-up will assess short-term and potential mid-term effects. Data will be analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Statistica 13.0 for descriptive and comprehensive statistical analysis. Quantitative indicators will be assessed using appropriate tests (Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon T, χ2) to determine significant differences between groups. The study addresses key questions: Does heparin-conjugated gel offer better cartilage repair, functional improvement, and pain reduction than microfracture? Does the hydrogel approach better preserve joint integrity and slow degeneration? Are there complications with either method? This study combines cellular and surgical components to explore innovative cartilage lesion treatments. Comparing with microfracture and using a thorough follow-up, it aims to enhance cartilage repair techniques and patient outcomes.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the technique of subchondroplasty in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does the subchondroplasty technique with the administration of AccuFill Porous Bone Substitute Material (BSM) is effective in the relief of mechanical pain in patient with knee osteoarthritis ? Participants will go under a minimally invasive surgery procedure (subchondroplasty) and fulfil 3 validated questionnaires to assess pain, functional impairments and subjective improvement. This study will be conducted for 4 years.
This study aimed to determine the effects of different manual mobilization techniques on pain, muscle strength, and functional limitations in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (Knee OA). A double-blinded pretest-posttest experimental study. This research employed a two-arm parallel group randomized comparative design. A total of thirty participants diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned and equally divided into groups 1 and 2, each containing 15 participants. Both Group 1 and Group 2 underwent Maitland and Mulligan mobilization techniques, alongside a common Interferential therapy (IFT) regimen, over the course of three sessions per week for a duration of four weeks. The assessment of pain and functional disability outcomes was conducted through the application of The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at the baseline and four weeks following the intervention. To determine the effects of the intervention within and between the groups, the outcome scores were subjected to analysis using both dependent and independent t-tests.
This clinical trial will investigate whether metallic lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is as stable as bony lateralization during the first two postsurgical years, measured with CT-based motion analysis (CTMA).
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different types of reverse shoulder replacements. Researchers will compare a conventional reverse shoulder replacement with a lateralized reverse shoulder replacement to see if there is a difference in how well the patients function after two years.
This is a hybrid, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that will last 12 weeks. Participants will be randomized into either the intervention product or control group and will consume the test product or control daily. Participants will complete study-specific and validated questionnaires at Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12, as well as blood biomarker testing for a lipid panel and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) at Baseline and Week 12. Osteoarthritis-like symptoms, such as joint pain, inflammation, and reduced mobility will be evaluated at baseline and at each check-in. Likert scale responses will be examined from baseline to each check-in. Participant responses on product feedback will be presented as % scores. Two validated questionnaires, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will also be completed at the questionnaire time points. A full lipid panel and hs-CRP measurement will be completed via in-person blood draws.