Osteoarthritis, Knee Clinical Trial
Official title:
Determining the Effectiveness of a Novel Phototherapy for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
| Verified date | January 2020 |
| Source | Queen's University |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
Light therapy (phototherapy) has previously been shown to help reduce pain for people with musculoskeletal pain conditions, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). A new phototherapy has been developed that allows for customizing the intensity of light based on patient characteristics, such as the patient size and skin type. This new phototherapy approach needs to be evaluated to determine its effects. This study has been planned to determine how effective the new phototherapy is, but first it needs to be determined whether the study plans are feasible. This study will determine the feasibility of the full study by pilot testing the methods for the full trial with a group of 20 people with knee osteoarthritis. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive the new phototherapy approach or a placebo phototherapy twice/week for four weeks. Pain and function will be measured over the four week treatment period and 12-weeks follow-up.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 20 |
| Est. completion date | March 19, 2019 |
| Est. primary completion date | December 21, 2018 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - English speaking adults (>18 years of age) - Provided with a diagnosis of knee OA by a physician - Self-report of having experienced pain and disability related to knee OA for at least 6 months. Exclusion Criteria: - Skin conditions in which application of phototherapy may be contra-indicated (skin cancer, people receiving radiation therapy) - History of total joint arthroplasty of the affected knee - Red flags suggestive of non-musculoskeletal etiology (i.e. fever/chills, unrelenting night pain, multi-segmental or bilateral loss of sensation, sudden unexplained weight loss). |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | Queen's University | Kingston | Ontario |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Queen's University | Invitalize |
Canada,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Recruitment Rate | The feasibility of patient recruitment will be determined by the overall recruitment rate. The full trial will be considered feasible with our current recruitment methods if, during the pilot study, an average recruitment rate of at least 3 patients per week is achieved. This recruitment rate will allow us to exceed the 168 participants needed for a fully powered trial in a 56 week recruitment period. The findings of this study will inform whether this preliminary plan is feasible or if additional sites are needed. | Baseline | |
| Primary | Feasibility of Assessment Procedures: completion rate | Feasibility of the assessment procedures will be measured by completion rate of outcome measures. As recommended for pilot studies, we set criteria a priori for acceptable completeness and considered >80% of all assessment items completed. | Through study completion (16 weeks) | |
| Primary | Retention Rate | Retention will be assessed by attrition rate, with <20% attrition at 3-month follow-up (16 weeks) considered indicative of feasibility with our current protocol. | Through study completion (16 weeks) | |
| Primary | Feasibility of Research Assistant (RA) Training: rating | Feasibility of training the RA who will implement the phototherapy intervention will be evaluated a rating of self-efficacy (0-10) for delivering the intervention, where a lower score would indicate a lower rating of preparedness for delivering the intervention and a higher score would indicate a higher rating of preparedness to deliver the intervention. | Baseline | |
| Primary | Monitoring Treatment Fidelity | Fidelity was measured through an audit of the fidelity checklist and reported as a proportion of intervention components delivered in alignment with the protocol. An a-priori acceptable level of fidelity was considered 80% for each component of the intervention among participants that attend each visit. | Through study completion (16 weeks) | |
| Secondary | Change in Sensitivity to Physical Activity (SPA) | Change in SPA will be measured using the change in reported knee pain throughout the 6MWT. Pain intensity will be measured each minute throughout the 6MWT using a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors including no pain (0) to worst imaginable pain (100mm). The SPA index will be the difference between the peak pain intensity during the 6MWT and the baseline pain intensity at rest. Pain during physical activity will be the primary outcome measure for the full trial, measured using the change in SPA. |
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (1st, 4th and 8th clinic visits) | |
| Secondary | Change in Physical Function | Change in physical function will be measured using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The 6MWT is a test of walking speed/aerobic capacity/endurance. It involves walking continuously on a 30-meter walkway for 6 minutes. The score on the test is the distance walked. | Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (1st, 4th and 8th clinic visits) | |
| Secondary | Change in Pain Intensity: VAS | Change in pain intensity will be measured using a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors including no pain (0) to worst imaginable pain (100mm). Participants will be asked to report their pain intensity at its worst in the past 24 hours, at its best in the past 24 hours, their average pain and their pain right now. | Each clinical visit (twice per week for four weeks) | |
| Secondary | Change in Self-Reported Function | Change in self-reported function - physical function will be measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscale (0 to 68) with higher scores indicating greater functional limitations. The WOMAC physical function subscale uses a series of questions about functional tasks answered on a four-point Likert scale. | Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks | |
| Secondary | Monitoring Exercise Adherence | Adherence to prescribed exercise will be measured using a self-report diary of all exercises prescribed. | Through study completion (16 weeks) | |
| Secondary | Global Rating of Change in Pain | Global rating of change in pain will be measured using an 11-point global rating of change (GROC) scale (-5 to +5, where -5 is much worse and +5 is much better), as has been recommended in the literature for self-reported rating of change | Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks | |
| Secondary | Global Rating of Change in Functional Abilities | Global rating of change in functional abilities will be measured using an 11-point global rating of change (GROC) scale (-5 to +5, where -5 is much worse and +5 is much better), as has been recommended in the literature for self-reported rating of change | Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks | |
| Secondary | Global Rating of Change in Satisfaction with Care | Global rating of change in satisfaction with care will be measured using an 11-point global rating of change (GROC) scale (-5 to +5, where -5 is very dissatisfied and +5 is very satisfied), as has been recommended in the literature for self-reported rating of change | Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks | |
| Secondary | Change in Pressure Pain Threshold: Newtons (N) | Change in pressure pain threshold will be assessed as follows: pressure will be applied at nine predetermined points around the knee using a handheld pressure algometer. Participants will be asked to report the moment the pressure switches from comfortable pressure to slightly unpleasant pain. The pressure pain threshold will be recorded in Newtons (N). This is measured as a process outcome to determine if it relates to SPA. | Baseline and 4 weeks (1st and 8th clinic visits) | |
| Secondary | Adverse Events | Adverse events will be recorded using an adverse events questionnaire that is reported consistently with reporting guidelines and asks: 1) if the patient has experienced any events as a result of any of the treatments received (yes/no); 2) how long the event lasted (hours or days); 3) How severe the adverse event was (0-10 scale); 4) what adverse events were experienced. Any serious adverse events will be addressed immediately by referral to the most appropriate member of the primary health care team. | 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT03895489 -
Effectiveness of the Journey Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Two Standard of Care Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03660943 -
A Clinical Study to Test Efficacy and Safety of Repeat Doses of CNTX-4975-05 in Patients With Osteoarthritis Knee Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04531969 -
Comparison of Outpatient and Inpatient Spa Therapy
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02848027 -
Correlating the Osteoarthritic Knee Microenvironment to Clinical Outcome After Treatment With Regenexx®SD Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT05160246 -
The Instant Effect of Kinesiology Taping in Patients With Knee OA
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06080763 -
Biomechanics and Clinical Outcomes in Responders and Non-Responders
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03643588 -
The Comparison of HYAJOINT Plus and Hyalgan Hyaluronan Supplement for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05100225 -
Efficacy and Safety Trial of PTP-001 (MOTYS) for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04061733 -
New Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Hydrogel for the Treatment of the Pain of Knee Arthrosis
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04051489 -
A Novel Smartphone Application for "Smart" Knee Osteoarthritis Trials
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05546541 -
Epidemiology and Nutrition
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05447767 -
Prediction AlgoriThm for regeneraTive Medicine Approach in knEe OA: New Decision-making Process Based on Patient pRofiliNg
|
Phase 2 | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT04448106 -
Autologous Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (AdMSCs) for Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT03225911 -
Effect of a Lateral Wedge Insole and Simple Knee Sleeve in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05070871 -
A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05703087 -
Positive Cueing in Knee Arthroplasty.
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06042426 -
Effects of Perioperative Intravenous Dexamethasone in Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Hispanic Population
|
Phase 4 | |
| Terminated |
NCT02615522 -
Prospective Post Market Clinical Follow-Up of the Primary Knee Endoprosthesis BPK-S Integration
|
||
| Completed |
NCT02901964 -
Effect of Strengthening the Hip Abductor in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02905747 -
The Effect of Medical Exercise Therapy on Pain, Function and Physical Activity in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A |