Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04197284
Other study ID # 1505984
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 28, 2020
Est. completion date June 2022

Study information

Verified date April 2021
Source Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb
Contact Silvija Mahnik, MD
Phone +385 (0)1 2368 911
Email silvija.mahnik@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic joint disease that involves the entire joint, causing cartilage damage, bone remodeling, osteophyte formation and loss of normal joint function. Knee OA is one of the leading causes of disability in the world and thus represents a major public health problem. Knee OA treatment can be operative and non-operative. Non-operative treatment includes pharmacological treatment, changing life style and physical therapy. The goal of physical therapy in knee OA is to reduce pain and improve knee function through therapeutic exercise, especially by strengthening the quadriceps muscle. In addition to therapeutic exercise, muscle electrical stimulation is often used, and in the literature there is evidence of biofeedback therapy efficacy. Goal of the study is to investigate whether there is a difference in pain reduction, increase in quadriceps muscle strength, and improvement in knee function in patients who had only kinesitherapy, from those who underwent kinesitherapy and biofeedback, and in patients who received electrical stimulation of quadriceps muscle with kinesitherapy. 93 patients with knee OA according to ACR criteria and Kellgren and Lawrence radiological classification grades 1 and 2 will be included in study. Subjects will complete: Visually Analogous Pain Scale (VAS), Western Ontario Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF 36), International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) osteoarthritis core set, and quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by EMG biofeedback device.


Description:

The research will be conducted in the Department of Orthopedic surgery of the Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb. The research will be prospective, randomized, single blinded. Randomization of patients will be performed before physical therapy using web site www.randomization.com, and the results of the randomization will be known to the physician who will not be directly involved in the treatment or examination of patients. All patients will sign informed consent before the study begins. Research has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb and Ethics committee of the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb. Inclusion criteria are: patients age 55 years and older who have knee OA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR) and knee OA according to Kellgren and Lawrence Radiology Classification Grade 1 and 2, and who report knee pain for at least 3 months. Exclusion criteria are: patients who had surgery on that knee, patients with a pacemaker, and metallic foreign body in the area of muscle stimulation, patients with thrombophlebitis and deep vein thrombosis, patients with skin infection, malignancy, bleeding disorders, patients with neurological disease, patients with inflammatory rheumatological disease, with congenital and acquired knee deformities, with contractures of the hips and ankles, with grade 3 and 4 osteoarthritis according to Kellgren and Lawrence classification, patients who received intraarticular knee injection in the last 3 months and patients with post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis. The investigators will record: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, leg length and use of orthopedics aids. Clinical examination will be performed on the first day, day 21, after 90 and after 180 days. At each examination patients will complete following questionnaires: Visually Analog Scale for pain (VAS), Western Ontario Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF 36) and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) osteoarthritis core set. Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured with a Biofeedback therapy device (EMG Biofeedback, Myomed 632, United Kingdom, 2017) . Patients will be randomisen in three groups. Patients in the first group will be treated with individual kinesitherapy. Patients in the second group will be treated with individual kinesitherapy and biofeedback therapy for strengthening of the quadriceps muscle using EMG Biofeedback device, Myomed 632, United Kingdom, 2017. Patients in the third group will be treated with individual kinesitherapy together with electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscle using electrostimulation device (BTL- 4000 Smart, United Kingdom, 2017). The required sample size was calculated based on pain values data reported in the study by Choi et al. Pain was measured using VAS scale, and sample size was calculated using G Power software package (v3.1.9.4). With the parameter of statistical significance level (alpha) of 0.05 and a test power (1 - beta) of 0.90, based on the data from the Choi et al work, the required final sample size is a total of 93 subjects and 31 subjects for each of the three groups. The investigators expect to find that kinesitherapy and biofeedback therapy are more efficient compared to kinesitherapy alone or and kinesitherapy and electrical stimulation in reducing pain, improving knee function and strengthening of the quadriceps muscle.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 93
Est. completion date June 2022
Est. primary completion date October 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 55 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - radiological evidence of primary OA with Grade 1 and 2 on the Kellgren-Lawrence Scale - knee pain for 3 months - knee osteoarthritis defined by American College of Rheumatology Criteria Exclusion Criteria: - surgery on that knee - pacemaker - metallic foreign body in the area of stimulation - thrombophlebitis and thrombosis - skin infection - malignancy, - bleeding disorders - neurological disease - inflammatory rheumatology disease - congenital and acquired knee deformities - contracture of the hips and ankles - grade 3 and 4 osteoarthritis om the Kellgren and Lawrence classification - intraarticular injection in the last 3 months - post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Biofeedback, Myomed 632
Biofeedback is a mind-body technique that involves using visual or auditory feedback to gain control over involuntary bodily functions. Electrical stimulation is a technique used to elicit a muscle contraction using electrical impulses.
device for electrical stimulation, BTL 4000 Smart
Electrical stimulation is a technique used to elicit a muscle contraction using electrical impulses. Electrodes, controlled by a unit, are placed on the skin over a predetermined area. Electrical current is then sent from the unit to the electrodes and delivered into the muscle causing a contraction.
Other:
kinesitherapy
isometric exercise of the quadriceps muscle

Locations

Country Name City State
Croatia University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Zagreb

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Croatia, 

References & Publications (17)

Akkaya N, Ardic F, Ozgen M, Akkaya S, Sahin F, Kilic A. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback and electrical stimulation following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Mar;26(3):224-36. doi: 10.1177/0269215511419382. Epub 2011 Oct 4. — View Citation

Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40. — View Citation

Cherian JJ, McElroy MJ, Kapadia BH, Bhave A, Mont MA. Prospective Case Series of NMES for Quadriceps Weakness and Decrease Function in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2015;25(4):301-6. — View Citation

Choi YL, Kim BK, Hwang YP, Moon OK, Choi WS. Effects of isometric exercise using biofeedback on maximum voluntary isometric contraction, pain, and muscle thickness in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jan;27(1):149-53. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.149. Epub 2015 Jan 9. — View Citation

de Oliveira Melo M, Aragão FA, Vaz MA. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle strengthening in elderly with knee osteoarthritis - a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013 Feb;19(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 18. Review. — View Citation

de Oliveira Melo M, Pompeo KD, Baroni BM, Vaz MA. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and low-level laser therapy on neuromuscular parameters and health status in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized trial. J Rehabil Med. 2016 Mar;48(3):293-9. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2062. — View Citation

Durmus D, Alayli G, Cantürk F. Effects of quadriceps electrical stimulation program on clinical parameters in the patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007 May;26(5):674-8. Epub 2006 Aug 1. — View Citation

Eid MA, Aly SM, El-Shamy SM. Effect of Electromyographic Biofeedback Training on Pain, Quadriceps Muscle Strength, and Functional Ability in Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Dec;95(12):921-930. — View Citation

Giggins O, Fullen B, Coughlan G. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Oct;26(10):867-81. doi: 10.1177/0269215511431902. Epub 2012 Feb 9. Review. — View Citation

Grazio S. [International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in the most important diseases and conditions of rheumatology practice]. Reumatizam. 2011;58(1):27-43. Croatian. — View Citation

Hurley MV, Scott DL. Improvements in quadriceps sensorimotor function and disability of patients with knee osteoarthritis following a clinically practicable exercise regime. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Nov;37(11):1181-7. — View Citation

Lepley AS, Gribble PA, Pietrosimone BG. Effects of electromyographic biofeedback on quadriceps strength: a systematic review. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Mar;26(3):873-82. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225ff75. Review. — View Citation

Lucca JA, Recchiuti SJ. Effect of electromyographic biofeedback on an isometric strengthening program. Phys Ther. 1983 Feb;63(2):200-3. — View Citation

Maslic Sersic D, Vuletic G. Psychometric evaluation and establishing norms of Croatian SF-36 health survey: framework for subjective health research. Croat Med J. 2006 Feb;47(1):95-102. — View Citation

Raeissadat SA, Rayegani SM, Sedighipour L, Bossaghzade Z, Abdollahzadeh MH, Nikray R, Mollayi F. The efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback on pain, function, and maximal thickness of vastus medialis oblique muscle in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. J Pain Res. 2018 Nov 8;11:2781-2789. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S169613. eCollection 2018. — View Citation

Yilmaz OO, Senocak O, Sahin E, Baydar M, Gulbahar S, Bircan C, Alper S. Efficacy of EMG-biofeedback in knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2010 May;30(7):887-92. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1070-9. Epub 2009 Aug 20. — View Citation

Zeng C, Li H, Yang T, Deng ZH, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Lei GH. Electrical stimulation for pain relief in knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Feb;23(2):189-202. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 26. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 17 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Impact of biofeedback therapy on change in knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 3 weeks
Primary Impact of biofeedback therapy on change in knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 3 months
Primary Impact of biofeedback therapy on change in knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 6 months
Secondary Impact of biofeedback therapy on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 3 weeks
Secondary Impact of biofeedback therapy on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 3 months
Secondary Impact of biofeedback therapy on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 6 months
Secondary Impact of biofeedback therapy on muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 3 weeks
Secondary Impact of biofeedback therapy on muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 3 months
Secondary Impact of biofeedback therapy on muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether the use of biofeedback for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 6 months
Secondary Impact of kinesitherapy on knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on VAS scale. Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 3 weeks
Secondary Impact of kinesitherapy on knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on VAS scale. Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 3 months
Secondary Impact of kinesitherapy on knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on VAS scale. Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 6 months
Secondary Impact of kinesitherpay on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 3 weeks
Secondary Impact of kinesitherpay on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 3 months
Secondary Impact of kinesitherpay on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 6 months
Secondary Impact of kinesiotherapy on quadriceps muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 3 weeks
Secondary Impact of kinesiotherapy on quadriceps muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 3 months
Secondary Impact of kinesiotherapy on quadriceps muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether kinesitherapy for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 6 months
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscle on knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on VAS scale. Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 3 weeks
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscle on knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on VAS scale. Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 3 months
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscle on knee pain measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Determine whether electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening will change knee pain score measured on VAS scale. Change will be measured on VAS scale in millimeters, from 0 to 100 mm, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity. 6 months
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether the use of electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 3 weeks
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether the use of electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 3 months
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation on knee function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Determine whether the use of electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes knee function score measured by WOMAC questionnaire. Questionnaire consists 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain, Stifness and Physical Functioning. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4 , from best to worse. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. 6 months
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation on quadriceps muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether the use of electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 3 weeks
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation on quadriceps muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether the use of electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 3 months
Secondary Impact of electrical stimulation on quadriceps muscle strength measured by EMG biofeedback device. Determine whether the use of electrical stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening changes quadriceps muscle strength measured on EMG biofeedback device in micro volts during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03895489 - Effectiveness of the Journey Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Two Standard of Care Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses N/A
Completed NCT03660943 - A Clinical Study to Test Efficacy and Safety of Repeat Doses of CNTX-4975-05 in Patients With Osteoarthritis Knee Pain Phase 3
Completed NCT04531969 - Comparison of Outpatient and Inpatient Spa Therapy N/A
Completed NCT02848027 - Correlating the Osteoarthritic Knee Microenvironment to Clinical Outcome After Treatment With Regenexx®SD Treatment Phase 3
Completed NCT05160246 - The Instant Effect of Kinesiology Taping in Patients With Knee OA N/A
Recruiting NCT06080763 - Biomechanics and Clinical Outcomes in Responders and Non-Responders
Completed NCT03643588 - The Comparison of HYAJOINT Plus and Hyalgan Hyaluronan Supplement for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05100225 - Efficacy and Safety Trial of PTP-001 (MOTYS) for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04061733 - New Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Hydrogel for the Treatment of the Pain of Knee Arthrosis N/A
Completed NCT04051489 - A Novel Smartphone Application for "Smart" Knee Osteoarthritis Trials
Recruiting NCT05546541 - Epidemiology and Nutrition
Recruiting NCT05447767 - Prediction AlgoriThm for regeneraTive Medicine Approach in knEe OA: New Decision-making Process Based on Patient pRofiliNg Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT04448106 - Autologous Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (AdMSCs) for Osteoarthritis Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT03225911 - Effect of a Lateral Wedge Insole and Simple Knee Sleeve in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Completed NCT05070871 - A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women N/A
Completed NCT05703087 - Positive Cueing in Knee Arthroplasty. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06042426 - Effects of Perioperative Intravenous Dexamethasone in Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Hispanic Population Phase 4
Completed NCT02905747 - The Effect of Medical Exercise Therapy on Pain, Function and Physical Activity in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Terminated NCT02615522 - Prospective Post Market Clinical Follow-Up of the Primary Knee Endoprosthesis BPK-S Integration
Completed NCT02944448 - A Study Evaluating Pain Relief and Safety of Orally Administered CR845 in Patients With Osteoarthritis of Hip or Knee Phase 2